I did not read the thread.
But it's a joke that as a user you obviously have to do Apple's homework...
Or does Apple do it on purpose to make the ARM Macs look better.
Nice going! We're getting pretty much the same performanceUpdate: went ahead with the heatsink and heat pad mods and oh...my...
The performance gains are absolutely amazing, but the temperature drop and stability is even more impressive in my opinion. This has turned my MBA into the powerhouse it ought to be.
View attachment 925596
Left side is pre-mod GeekBench testing; right side is post-mod. Look at how much more stable the frequencies and temperatures are. Also, note how much lower the temps are post-mod, with only a single 100*C peak.
GeekBench before the mods:
View attachment 925597
GeekBench after the mods:
View attachment 925598
I added a couple of my test results in PhightinPhils26's spreadsheet here. I'll continue some tests tomorrow, but early indicators are extremely positive.
Lastly, I documented much of the process and put together a thread with instructions here. This is 100% credited to everyone here like @DanSilov, @Robotronic, @kinchee87, etc. Thanks for the advice and how-tos. I couldn't be happier with the results.
adding the spreadsheet to page one,Update: went ahead with the heatsink and heat pad mods and oh...my...
The performance gains are absolutely amazing, but the temperature drop and stability is even more impressive in my opinion. This has turned my MBA into the powerhouse it ought to be.
View attachment 925596
Left side is pre-mod GeekBench testing; right side is post-mod. Look at how much more stable the frequencies and temperatures are. Also, note how much lower the temps are post-mod, with only a single 100*C peak.
GeekBench before the mods:
View attachment 925597
GeekBench after the mods:
View attachment 925598
I added a couple of my test results in PhightinPhils26's spreadsheet here. I'll continue some tests tomorrow, but early indicators are extremely positive.
Lastly, I documented much of the process and put together a thread with instructions here. This is 100% credited to everyone here like @DanSilov, @Robotronic, @kinchee87, etc. Thanks for the advice and how-tos. I couldn't be happier with the results.
With or without heatpipe, if there is a gap between the CPU and the heatsink is impossibleto have a good cooling.Quickcool is a german company that makes custom heatpipes, maybe this could lead somewhere
The reason why you cannot watch > 1080p videos on YouTube smoothly on a Mac is the codec war (VP9 vs H.265), not a hardware problem.Sorry to say it but Apple is not up to it ... I regret having spent more than € 1,000 for later with a Chinese laptop to have better performance at the level of a Pro ... I can view YouTube videos at 8K 60fps without jerks and without heat or noise ... Even being an 8th generation Intel when wearing a Geforce MX250 you can see a brutality. To anyone who has not bought a Mac at least I recommend you look at the Huawei 13 2K. Yes, it goes with Windows but so what ??? I have both platforms (I have a 2015 MBP) and the truth is I keep this one.
Sorry to say it but Apple is not up to it ... I regret having spent more than € 1,000 for later with a Chinese laptop to have better performance at the level of a Pro ... I can view YouTube videos at 8K 60fps without jerks and without heat or noise ... Even being an 8th generation Intel when wearing a Geforce MX250 you can see a brutality. To anyone who has not bought a Mac at least I recommend you look at the Huawei 13 2K. Yes, it goes with Windows but so what ??? I have both platforms (I have a 2015 MBP) and the truth is I keep this one.
Are you going to tell me that I have to publish ???Nor is this the forum to post this in.
Just got the notification xD they milled out the screw holes to move the heatsink closer to the dies rather than just add copper shims. this seems like a mistake due to being a lot less material to heat soak than the unmodified heatsink + copper shim...I hope you all enjoy this:
If I were these engineers I would Ask my money back from whatever phd program they came out of.
As it stand it can’t load 100% for more than couple minutes without throttling, never mind 24/7
No doubt Apple hires the best but it doesn’t mean they don’t blunder, the utter failure of butterfly keyboard is a pure example of that
They don’t need to add another fan, just add a heat pipe, the thermal cooling benefit it brings would actually reduce fan rpm, thus lowering battery usage
the 2018 mba internal design is clear they went with form over function
because i ran 100% just fine at least for 10 mins exporting short videos and the likes on my old 2014 mba, clearly the newer mba are less capable.If you’re running CPU at 100%, why are you buying an Air? Clearly you need something with more computing power.
These two have no idea of imagination ... I have done more without resources than they ... total pantente is the **** that Apple has made portable ...I hope you all enjoy this:
@srkirt, I'm quite tempted by Huawei and even the AMD version which is even cheaper for a windows feel but on a mac type platform. I still won't let the MBA go as I love the OS and settled with the performance of the 2018 model post mod (it was ok before but better now). The Matebook AMD is on sale here in the UK for £579, 8GB/256GBSorry to say it but Apple is not up to it ... I regret having spent more than € 1,000 for later with a Chinese laptop to have better performance at the level of a Pro ... I can view YouTube videos at 8K 60fps without jerks and without heat or noise ... Even being an 8th generation Intel when wearing a Geforce MX250 you can see a brutality. To anyone who has not bought a Mac at least I recommend you look at the Huawei 13 2K. Yes, it goes with Windows but so what ??? I have both platforms (I have a 2015 MBP) and the truth is I keep this one.
These tests are with battery mode.
Does the MX250 work ok MacOS ?These two have no idea of imagination ... I have done more without resources than they ... total pantente is the **** that Apple has made portable ...
[automerge]1592769845[/automerge]
Now for a Hackintosh ...
because i ran 100% just fine at least for 10 mins exporting short videos and the likes on my old 2014 mba, clearly the newer mba are less capable.
The design is the same on the 2018 where there is even more space between the CPU and the heatsink than on the 2020 model, the shim is the way to go unless you want to add additional heat to the bottom case.There has to be some kind of story behind the 2020 MBA. There are just too many odd quirks. Why does the heat sink not make sit flush against the CPU die? Why is there a fan, but no heat pipe connecting it to the heat sink?
Also, why does Apple now give consumers three CPU choices in the 2020 MBA? The i5 upgrade only costs $100, a relatively-small amount compared to other upgrades. It is as if Apple had difficulty deciding what the base model CPU should be because of the trade-off between the i3 and i5.
The 2020 MBA largely shares the same chassis as the 2018 MBA. Apple and the rest of the industry had planned for more power-efficient chips from Intel by this point, so Apple made the 2018 MBA chassis with a fan, but no heat pipe. The problem is those power-efficient chips never came. I wonder if Apple initially tested the i5 CPU as the base model CPU, but it turned out to run hotter than what Apple (and Intel) expected when Apple designed the chassis years ago. Intel then offered the i3 to Apple as an option to lower heat (and cost). Apple tried many heat sink designs, but they all ran hot. In the end, they went with the lightest heat sink tested: one with less copper and more paste. Apple might have been more sensitive to weight because the 2020 MBA is already thicker and heavier due to the switch to the Magic Keyboard. Then, Apple and Intel were about to have a huge fight, but looked deep into each other's eyes and kissed.
I see no "anacedals" [sic] of overheating.
It's designed to throttle in certain operating conditions. That's what it's supposed to do. If Apple let the processor runaway with heat generation, it could (and probably would) eventually damage the other components.
And heat management isn't just about the CPU. The CPU doesn't live all by itself on a tiny desert island.
Are you not aware that Intel produces families of processors? It's not like Apple could only use this one. Usually there are several choices within a certain TDP.
My guess is that Apple gets dozens if not hundreds of sample units of pretty much any production CPU Intel makes as well as a bunch of pre-production demos to research.
There's also cost which you have completely ignored. Your blinders are strictly on the CPU.
It's not just about the CPU.
This isn't a homebuilt PC from 1997. You don't just drop in a bigger Panasonic case fan, bigger PC Power & Cooling power supply when you upgrade your Pentium II or graphics card in your Lian Li ATX case.
If you think you can design notebook computers better than Apple's current engineering staff, why don't you send in your resume? They're always looking for engineering talent.