Explain the breakdown in logic here? Lewis was "robbed" by the race director, yet they refuse to pursue options that are there and should rightfully be used to confirm once and for all who is the real winner, you cannot say they are victims, then say that did the right thing, in not going to court, that is like saying I was burgled, but I am not going to press charges.. What? Why?
The courts are there to be used, so when Mr Wollf and driver of car 44 chose not to pursue their rights in the courts, then all argument about crimes is pointless, someone needs to be the adult in the room, clearly not Mr Wolff, or driver of car 44, as well they accept the situation, clearly, but then that does not explain Mr Wolff's comments about "mikey this is not right.." it had to be right, if not they should have pursued legal action to confirm what Mr Wolff believed was an injustice, so given they abandoned legal action, race director should not have been fired, as he did his job 100% correctly as no one sought to change this... He has a clear case against the FIA for what they did to him..
Anyway it is all a mute point, Mr Wolff proved he is unfit in his position, he has to live with the regret of not doing his legal duty.