Mate, it’s two power cables and a usb-c cable…Very upsetting. Who wants more wires on their desk?
Mate, it’s two power cables and a usb-c cable…Very upsetting. Who wants more wires on their desk?
so triple the cable count from an imacMate, it’s two power cables and a usb-c cable…
He agrees with you 100%Personally I think the iMac Pro 27" or at the very least the iMac 27" will live to see another day. Here's a few reasons I think this:
- The quote was "making our transition nearly complete with only one product left to go, the Mac Pro". The iMac Pro doesn't exist in the lineup as it stands today, it was discontinued last year. Therefore he couldn't include the iMac Pro in that because it wouldn't make sense against the current product lineup. He'd be referencing a product that doesn't currently exist. In terms of the 27" regular iMac, he didn't need to reference that because the iMac as a general product has been updated to AS already.
- I wouldn't take the quote too seriously as it is, because they still haven't upgraded the higher-end Intel Mac mini so therefore the quote isn't fully accurate anyway.
- On the Apple Website the iMac is still specified as 'iMac 24"'. Therefore I think at the very least a different screen size will be introduced at some point, whether that be in an iMac Pro or a larger iMac with M1 Pro chips (most likely imo). The MacBook Air, only available in one screen size, does not have it's screen size listed against it's name on the website - only those that do come in different sizes have that denomination.
EDIT: Just thought of another; The M1 Pro chip currently does not feature in any of Apples desktop computers leaving a big gap between the M1 and the M1 Max. I think a higher-end iMac (with a larger screen to boot) seems like the logical choice for the M1 Pro.
Yeah. In a year, maybe two...It's not dead just on vacation. It will be back soon
Really?
The 27" is gone.
yep. I also don't need or want more than one display working off one computer. I have iPad and phone if i need to look at other things. edited to add the yep means I agree! You are not aloneVery upsetting. Who wants more wires on their desk? This was a mistake or am I in the minority of people who want a bigger screen all in one?
Reminds me of the John Frum cult.It's not dead just on vacation. It will be back soon
If you want something you can hook a non-Apple device to, get a non-Apple monitor.My hope going into yesterday was just that I didn't end up on the other end of it more uncertain of where I want to go for my next setup than I was coming in, and unfortunately that's exactly what happened.
I have a 2020 5k iMac. It's enough everything for me, but I would very much like to get onto an Apple Silicon something-or-other before the value of this thing craters. (Also, not going VESA mount ended up totally screwing me over, and I desperately want to move to something I can put on a real arm.) I was mentally planning for a like-for-like 27" 5k iMac in Apple Silicon to exist at some point. Now I have no idea what the right move is.
The screen is really the important thing to me. I need the "real" 2x retina nowadays, and a 27" or bigger screen. I was hoping for something bigger than 27" with mini LED and ProMotion.
The Studio combo is a little compelling, but I really only want/need an M1 Pro (I just want the media engine) and all the extra fancy business in the display (webcam, speakers) is stuff I don't need - but I also have that in my iMac and don't need it either, so whatever. I can also live with not being able to plug a second video device into an iMac but it's hard to swallow paying that much for a monitor that I can't also hook a Switch or something up to. It's a ton of money to lay out and not see any display improvement over my iMac.
I guess...if I'm holding out hope for an iMac Pro what I'd imagine / hope it'd be would be a Mac Studio, grafted onto an updated XDR display with Mini LED and ProMotion. Why would Apple sell that, though? Why wouldn't they just update the XDR display and tell people to buy whatever they want to hook it up?
Or just a "normal" 27" iMac, with the guts from a Macbook Pro (including M1 Pro option) grafted onto the back of a Studio Display. Again, why would Apple sell that now?
- The quote was "making our transition nearly complete with only one product left to go, the Mac Pro". The iMac Pro doesn't exist in the lineup as it stands today, it was discontinued last year. Therefore he couldn't include the iMac Pro in that because it wouldn't make sense against the current product lineup. He'd be referencing a product that doesn't currently exist. In terms of the 27" regular iMac, he didn't need to reference that because the iMac as a general product has been updated to AS already.
- I wouldn't take the quote too seriously as it is, because they still haven't upgraded the higher-end Intel Mac mini so therefore the quote isn't fully accurate anyway
They still don't offer a reasonable alternative, as in: reasonable price.The main reason the 27" was popular is Apple did not offer any reasonable alternative.
Actually, the higher end 2020 27" iMacs were quite powerful. More powerful than the base iMac Pro or Mac Pro.They still don't offer a reasonable alternative, as in: reasonable price.
The M1 Mini and 24" iMac are downgrades in one respect or another.
IMO, the main reason 27" iMac was popular is that is was very good value: A great large screen, and pretty good computer in an elegant package for great price. Perfect for those that want to have an exceptional interface experience but do not need the most powerful computing performance.
If the hypothetical M2 Pro Mac mini gets additional USB-C ports and/or additional USB-A ports, and is only a few hundred Ameribucks more, then I'm in. If it has the same number of ports as the M2 model, then I'd just get the M2 model. I'd only get 16 GB RAM anyway, and M2 is already blistering fast compared to what I have now. If M2 Pro, I'd be perfectly happy with a binned one with a few deactivated CPU and GPU cores.Well today's rumor du jour says the Mac mini is getting M2 and M2 Pro, so that will be a lower-price, but still powerful, option to pair with the Apple Studio Display than the Mac Studio for those looking to replace iMac 5Ks.
ersonally I think the iMac Pro 27" or at the very least the iMac 27" will live to see another day. Here's a few reasons I think this:
- The quote was "making our transition nearly complete with only one product left to go, the Mac Pro". The iMac Pro doesn't exist in the lineup as it stands today, it was discontinued last year. Therefore he couldn't include the iMac Pro in that because it wouldn't make sense against the current product lineup. He'd be referencing a product that doesn't currently exist. In terms of the 27" regular iMac, he didn't need to reference that because the iMac as a general product has been updated to AS already.
Im curious to know why they would completely pull the existing stock of 27" imacs from sale. Is that to force people who were waiting on the new one to not even have the choice to buy an old one and to have to go for the studio.
Assuming another 27" all-in-one actually does get released:I expect it was a preemptive tactical move due to low stock and being unable to meet a sudden spike in demand from those who had been waiting for an Apple silicon 27" model and now fall back on the Intel model.
They may also be husbanding what they have left for any "last call" orders from major vendors and customers now that the model is no longer for sale.
I would not be surprised if Apple drastically slowed orders from suppliers months ago and would have been operating with a small cache of the three pre-built models and a small supply of BTO CPUs, GPUs, RAM and SSDs. They will also want to have stock on hand to support repairs (in-warranty and out) and could be setting aside some of their remaining supply for that purpose.
Yup. Agree with you 100%.Personally I think the iMac Pro 27" or at the very least the iMac 27" will live to see another day. Here's a few reasons I think this:
- The quote was "making our transition nearly complete with only one product left to go, the Mac Pro". The iMac Pro doesn't exist in the lineup as it stands today, it was discontinued last year. Therefore he couldn't include the iMac Pro in that because it wouldn't make sense against the current product lineup. He'd be referencing a product that doesn't currently exist. In terms of the 27" regular iMac, he didn't need to reference that because the iMac as a general product has been updated to AS already.
- I wouldn't take the quote too seriously as it is, because they still haven't upgraded the higher-end Intel Mac mini so therefore the quote isn't fully accurate anyway.
- On the Apple Website the iMac is still specified as 'iMac 24"'. Therefore I think at the very least a different screen size will be introduced at some point, whether that be in an iMac Pro or a larger iMac with M1 Pro chips (most likely imo). The MacBook Air, only available in one screen size, does not have it's screen size listed against it's name on the website - only those that do come in different sizes have that denomination.
EDIT: Just thought of another; The M1 Pro chip currently does not feature in any of Apples desktop computers leaving a big gap between the M1 and the M1 Max. I think a higher-end iMac (with a larger screen to boot) seems like the logical choice for the M1 Pro.