I just tested the M4 13” iPad Pro 1 TB in store using the same 256 MB PDF and the performance was no better. It took roughly the same amount of time to render the blurred text as my non-1TB machine. And when I scrolled, new text was blurred and then scrolling back the other way to reveal the text I previously viewed and what was just rendered in focus was blurred again.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPad 8GB vs 16GB RAM M4 iPad Pro
- Thread starter seasurfer
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Thanks - please do try with PDF Viewer, as what you are experiencing could also be due to PDF client issues. The stock one isn't that great. I do not experience that kind of blurriness with it, but do run into severe memory pressure issues regardless, so it will be instructive to see how the 8GB models fare in that regard.
Tried the PDF viewer with the same PDF file. Text stayed in focus no matter my scrolling. But free RAM dumped to around 82 MB.
Thanks - this was very useful. It confirms that PDF Viewer (the app) renders PDFs much better than the stock app, but also that it gobbles up available RAM. Will have a look at the way other PDF viewers deal with large files, to see whether this is an OS-wide issue or app-specific.
You can however imagine the performance when it comes to 1.5-2GB image-heavy PDFs. Such a case use probably warrants passing to 16GB of RAM more than video or image apps.
There is no guarantee that the app will perform better on 16 GB models outside of multitasking. We would have to see a real world comparison.
True. I have checked other apps with the same PDF. PDF Expert renders fine but eats up the RAM in the same manner, Xodo at some point loses it and freezes when scrolling. It is clear that all of these are eager to take up as much RAM as possible. The combination of 16GB plus swapping (mine is an Ipad Pro 2020, which does not swap) should alleviate things, but is no guarantee. I am trying to get more information on RAM entitlement from the developer before springing for the 16GB model.
I am only a photographer. iPads can handle this since a very long time. During the lockdown I started with video an audio. But audio don’t need the same power than video. Logic Pro for IPad is not so demanding.Hrmm, pay top dollar for a premium iPad with extra RAM, and then pay subscription pricing for incomplete software...
Editing on iPad is Hell - YouTube
...when my full version of FCP cost a flat $299, and which runs circles around the iPadOS version (yes, one actually needs to take the 12:38 of time watching that video to "get it") on my 2TB 32GB M1 Max MBP which cost $1K more than the IPP, I'm not seeing the cost-benefit here for IPP for FCP.
Funny Davinci Resolve for iPad runs on more iPad models than FCP.
It does but very poorly... In every iPad with 4GB RAM or less it crashes as soon as you open any advanced function (with 3GB it crashes even with basic use).
I doubt FCP take more RAM than Davinci, but I can see why Apple decided to limit it to M series only devices (since 6GB RAM iPads are pretty limited, A12Z and some A12X...)
davinci's minimum requirements for ipad is 16gb i believe so yeah anything less and its not worth it.
im using a 16gig m4 13 incher and scrolling , editing, using the color wheel unit and speed editor work flawlessly.
im using a 16gig m4 13 incher and scrolling , editing, using the color wheel unit and speed editor work flawlessly.
No, Davinci can work on anything A12 or higher (so 3GB RAM), but works best with 8GB and mostly fine with 6GB
Tell me. For which app more then 8 GB on the iPad would be fantastic. And has also an equivalent on MacOS (or Windows).
My list so far: FCP, Logic Pro, Stage Manager, Davinci Resolve.
I know, I know. They are not 100% equivalent.
My list so far: FCP, Logic Pro, Stage Manager, Davinci Resolve.
I know, I know. They are not 100% equivalent.
Waiting on my 1TB M4 13, and 11 iPad Pros to arrive. Been using the M2 variants of the same configuration which also have 16GB of memory.
8GB will probably be fine for most users.
I do expect that if you are a heavy Stage Manager user (I am), or if you hook it up to a Studio Display the memory will make a difference.
If you are in those groups though, I’d think that you know that prior to buying and take that into account for most situations.
8GB will probably be fine for most users.
I do expect that if you are a heavy Stage Manager user (I am), or if you hook it up to a Studio Display the memory will make a difference.
If you are in those groups though, I’d think that you know that prior to buying and take that into account for most situations.
I would love to see some benchmarks. It would be nice to know definitively rather than see more opinions.
The hardware is years ahead of the software so I reckon any decision is fine.
There was a reviewer that did the comparison, link is in my SSD post.
Bottom line, 16GB has no advantage.
Thread 'iPad Pro M4 SSD Speeds - Surprising Results!!'
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/ipad-pro-m4-ssd-speeds-surprising-results.2428537/
Not sure if I get you. Your thread is about SSD speed. I know the 512GB has only 8GB of RAM, but how does that prove 16GB of RAM has no advantage?
Repeating… refer to the link in the first post in the thread, it’s a video review comparing 8GB to 16GB.
also, apparently 1TB+ ipad airs still have 8GB ram. so the argument that 16GB of ram was required to support 1TB+ storage is a complete fabrication
Apple is sure doing a poor job explaining to people why they should splurge to get a 1TB+ iPad Pro.