Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Oh please, all of you, stop with this. These apps are aimed at pros, not dabblers and hobbyists and are priced accordingly. GIMP is no match for Photoshop, CMYK is not the be-all of pro features.

We'll be buying because we have work to do. So if you're making money with this stuff, then the price is a drop in the ocean... even as a freelancer, I could pay for the Design Premium suite with the payment from just one job.

Clap clap clap. Well done. First bit of sense I've read in this thread. Now we know who are the professionals around here, they are the ones not complaining.
 
Ignorance at it's best.

I'm sorry, but your personal situation is not the personal situation for everyone else who has a right to give out their opinion. I'm glad we've been out of the whole "The Sun turns around Earth" philosophy for hundreds of years, but it seems we haven't progressed much beyond the theory.

Again, you ? everyone, simply said. Stop acting like your word is truth, it's not.



Take your personal beef elsewhere. I speak from experience and know the trade pretty well with almost 25 years experience in the business. You?

My opinion on this is valid and I notice that fellow pros in this thread happen to agree with me for the most part. So why don't you substantiate your argument with something of value?
 
look, granted you can find exceptions to anything. but the fact is that you're missing the point of my post; if the software is worth your money, then what is the point of grumbling over the price? its not like moaning about it is going to make the price go down, or waiting to buy it make the $1199 charge any less expensive. in a nutshell, if the software is going to pay for itself, why should you be complaining about how expensive it was to begin with?

I am not moaning or grumbling. I am just stating calmly that I believe it is wrong that it is priced so high. When would you complain? If it reached $7000 for the Premium bundle?

I just didn't like how they were bundling the software. And the upgrade prices posted don't list anything that can upgrade to Design Premium.
 
I wouldn't steal the Vette, but I would steal software.

Why? Well, duh, because you won't get caught stealing software.

If I had the means to steal a Vette (if I didn't already own one :p ), and wouldn't get caught, hell yeah I'd steal it.

Well, no morals, what should we expect?... I hope you live in a city far away, I wouldn't want you as a neighbor.
 
Nope. Academic end-users must re-purchase the whole suite with each subsequent "upgrade."

Not true. I bought Acad. Ver of CS suite but when CS2 came out decided I only need PS, and not the other apps. I had no problem getting the PS CS2 upgrade to install.
 
In addition to not seeing an upgrade path to the full master bundle what about Acrobat 3d? I see Acrobat pro but don't think that is the same thing.
 
I am not moaning or grumbling. I am just stating calmly that I believe it is wrong that it is priced so high. When would you complain? If it reached $7000 for the Premium bundle?

I just didn't like how they were bundling the software. And the upgrade prices posted don't list anything that can upgrade to Design Premium.

Obviously there is nothing wrong with believing that they've taken a Windows Vista stance on the different options available. When would I complain? When the price surpasses what a reasonable professional could no longer say that it is worth the money. As to the lack of upgrade prices to design premium, as in the speculative list that was released by a third party before the software has been released by the developer? I've got to believe that Adobe will offer some sort of upgrade/upsell options to design premium. and if they don't, one could always upgrade the individual apps that they feel are most necessary.

Its really not worth arguing the point any further. I have to get back to work. Thank you for your valid viewpoint.
 
OK, so we got Photoshop Elements and (if you can put up with the clunkiness of X11) GIMP, but if you want to do vector graphics and page layouts, then Illustrator is the only game in town. And it's priced beyone the reach of any non-pro - particularly here in the UK.

If I can butt in here ...

Assuming it's OK to put up with X11, then you can use Inkscape for vector graphics and Scribus for desktop publishing/page layout. They are both Free/Libre/Open Source.

I don't know how they compare to Adobe tools because I do not use those. But when I had a Mac*, I had both Scribus and Inkscape running under X11. I think you'll find them pretty good for some work.

* I'm a Linux guy myself. Sold my Powerbook recently. May get a MacBook or iMac later in the year.
 
I just emailed Adobe support about this

In addition to not seeing an upgrade path to the full master bundle what about Acrobat 3d? I see Acrobat pro but don't think that is the same thing.

Acrobat 3D is windows/unix only at this point, and as I have pc's for my MCAD stuff, I emailed Adobe to see if my mac CS2 Premium 2.3 with Acrobat 2.3 will qualify me for the upgrade, and further, allow the registration process (which may require the CS2 disk). I wouldn't expect
 
Who needs Fireworks anymore?... unless you make animated gifs, it's useless. And please don't tell me you are still making table-sliced images for webpage layouts....

That is crap -- Fireworks has excellent integration with Flash, far better than photoshop or illustrator.

Publications are a large part of my job and yes, there are many times I've wished for the same feature in QuarkXpress, however, embedding text boxes as objects with heads and subs within other text boxes is possible in Quark, and their alignment and leading easy to control particularly if using a baseline grid. This ensures that they move in unison with the body text even as it is edited.

This capability is surely available in InDesign?

Yes this feature is available in InDesign.
 
I know they can afford the $1000+. But they will delay it as long as possible. And meanwhile, the artists hired there will suffer with their MacBook Pros waiting for the UB version. As for upgrade - the upgrade options didn't look too good.

I'm hoping these pricings aren't real. (At least the upgrade ones)

Then again, as I'll probably get it educational anyway, it won't really matter, will it?

Sorry, why would a professional design studio that uses Adobe apps be running Intel Macs now?

And if they can't afford software, why would they have shelled out for all-new hardware that a) doesn't have optimal-performing software available for it and b) would require the purchase of software later on that they can't afford?

This mooted design studio of yours can't exist anywhere in the real world and even if it did it won't for much longer with this extreme level of mismanagement.
 
I am not moaning or grumbling. I am just stating calmly that I believe it is wrong that it is priced so high. When would you complain? If it reached $7000 for the Premium bundle?

I just didn't like how they were bundling the software. And the upgrade prices posted don't list anything that can upgrade to Design Premium.

Agreed. I don't like the prices either. And I want an upgrade to Design Premium. But I won't steal it.

And $7,000?.. someone would come out with a competitior.. Quark?...
 
Obviously there is nothing wrong with believing that they've taken a Windows Vista stance on the different options available. When would I complain? When the price surpasses what a reasonable professional could no longer say that it is worth the money. As to the lack of upgrade prices to design premium, as in the speculative list that was released by a third party before the software has been released by the developer? I've got to believe that Adobe will offer some sort of upgrade/upsell options to design premium. and if they don't, one could always upgrade the individual apps that they feel are most necessary.

Its really not worth arguing the point any further. I have to get back to work. Thank you for your valid viewpoint.

You aren't realizing one small problem however: as Adobe has a monopoly, and everyone (figuratively) will need CS3, you might compare it (if it went MUCH father than it has now) to charging $1,000,000 for a transplant organ. The person will need the organ. It MUST be worth the money. But is it right to charge so much?
 
Umm... except BBedit sucks now too. BBedit was fine for the days of designing with tables, but it reeks for doing CSS sites. Dreamweaver is great if you need to create templated sites that allows the users to work in Contribute to update their content. Or do you enjoy doing the work a secretary should be doing?...

It sure seems to me a lot of the people arguing that using a text editor to manage a real website is viable must be kids who, at best, are working on MySpace pages or somesuch - they can't possibly really be responsible for a big site. I know I don't want to spend all my time editing simple web pages (as you say, secretary work). I need to spend most of my time writing Perl, working with MySQL, and doing server config/maintenance when necessary. Dreamweaver + Contribute lets me set up templates, then foist off the secretary work on the people who are closer to the information being presented anyway.

I use a text editor when I'm creating something new; but that's just the starting point. It goes to Dreamweaver as soon as possible.
 
Good for you. write your own program and sell it.

The right tool for the right job.

The point was I want to enable the secretary to change the phone # on the page and NOT call me to do it. Dreamweaver/Contribute works great for that.

Also, I use DW as my hand-coding tool as I can use it to create templates, and users can ad pages based on those templates. You don't HAVE to let DW generate the code.. I still code by hand, I just do it in DW.

Sure, if you use DW's visual layout tools, the code is a mess. But I don't use those tools.

DW is also great for when you are handing off a site to a client so you can build it with templates, they can edit, and you can update the templates later.

And ANY tool like DW is a bust for dynamic content. That's what CMS's are for.


Well said! I agree totally -- Dreamweaver is a great tool for custom built HTML sites with Flash and Multimedia integration and minimal database interaction.

You are correct that CMS's are best suited for dynamic content.

I have to laugh at "web developers" who still cling to the old "I write all my code from scratch" logic -- I recall those same attitudes 15 years ago regarding print production, art and design -- lots of those folks are unemployed now. Resistance to object-based open source design is astounding.

It sure seems to me a lot of the people arguing that using a text editor to manage a real website is viable must be kids who, at best, are working on MySpace pages or somesuch - they can't possibly really be responsible for a big site. I know I don't want to spend all my time editing simple web pages (as you say, secretary work). I need to spend most of my time writing Perl, working with MySQL, and doing server config/maintenance when necessary. Dreamweaver + Contribute lets me set up templates, then foist off the secretary work on the people who are closer to the information being presented anyway.

I use a text editor when I'm creating something new; but that's just the starting point. It goes to Dreamweaver as soon as possible.

Yes it goes to Dreamweaver or a CMS as soon as possible -- well said.

That is how one makes money and best serves clients, for sure.

Thanks for echoing my sentiments exactly.

Old logic dies hard.

I pirate software all the time, I don't have any problems sleeping at night. They gouge their prices because pros will pay it. So the way I see it, by me pirating it, they're not losing a sale since I wouldn't have bought it in the first place. :cool:

:eek: :D

That's crap -- I remember that attitude -- I used to have it 15 years ago.

Thankfully I grew up.

I wouldn't steal the Vette, but I would steal software.

Why? Well, duh, because you won't get caught stealing software.

If I had the means to steal a Vette (if I didn't already own one :p ), and wouldn't get caught, hell yeah I'd steal it.


Luckily I know Karma is real and you are fooling yourself if you think it won't get you.

So when you have "bad luck," remember, your actions brought it upon you.

You just can't handle brutal honesty.

I think it is you who is running from Brutal honesty.

Go have another drink or smoke and forget about the little voice inside.

Your actions remind me of me long ago: My life is much better now that I face truth and ethics.
 
Enrollment is up!

I'll be enrolling in college again. Wow, that's expensive.

I wonder what their policy will be for cross platform upgrades? I have several Macromedia licenses for Windows, but all my Adobe packages are on the Mac. But we wantssss it all Mac precious!
 
Oh please, all of you, stop with this. These apps are aimed at pros, not dabblers and hobbyists and are priced accordingly. GIMP is no match for Photoshop, CMYK is not the be-all of pro features.

We'll be buying because we have work to do. So if you're making money with this stuff, then the price is a drop in the ocean... even as a freelancer, I could pay for the Design Premium suite with the payment from just one job.
---
I'm not the person to ask but isn't Pages good enough for basic layout? I've never used it. I've seen people create nice posters in PowerPoint of all things... you've got PDF creation right there in OSX.

There's also Ragtime and a number of cheaper page layout apps...

As far as vector work is concerned, then something like this? $US95
http://mac.softpedia.com/get/Graphics/EazyDraw.shtml

I've got to be honest, I think many people here think they need more than they need... what 'hobbyist' needs to work with spot colours or have access to many of the features that they don't even know exist?

If you're a genuine student, then there's substantial edu pricing. There's just too much whining from people that don't need this stuff. Most pros aren't going to bat an eyelid; it's part and parcel of their overheads.
Thanks, BV. Don't know what I would do without someone to tell me what I want. Here's me thinking I can do things with PS and Illi that I couldn't do with Powerpoint and MacDraw...

The point is that the pros aren't paying full rate on this because they're either getting through their business, or upgrading a copy. Either way, they're at least getting a tax write-off because it's a business related expense.

There are no decent alternatives, which is where my complaint came from in the first place. I'm well aware that these are pro tools, and are priced as such. What's frustrating is that there is nothing filling the gap between the toys and the uber-apps and Adobe seems to have gone out of their way to bundle their products in a way that maximizes the expense for at home hobbyists.

Apple has done a much better job with their Express line of products. They found the small subset of features that the Pros need and tied the price to those.
This software isnt meant for hobbyist.

Actually the software in hobbyist hands is probably one of the worst things to happen to the software(increased pirating by lay people) and cranked out crappy "design".
Why are design types so condescending to amateurs? Is the business so cut-throat that you need to kill the weak and eat the young lest they become competition?

If it makes you feel any more secure, you won't be seeing my crappy design anywhere...
 
I'll be enrolling in college again. Wow, that's expensive.

I wonder what their policy will be for cross platform upgrades? I have several Macromedia licenses for Windows, but all my Adobe packages are on the Mac. But we wantssss it all Mac precious!

Maybe you'll see theBobcat hiding in the back of your classes, trying to steal an education....
 
Thanks, BV. Don't know what I would do without someone to tell me what I want. Here's me thinking I can do things with PS and Illi that I couldn't do with Powerpoint and MacDraw...


I'm not telling you what you want. Someone asked what they could use to produce artwork that didn't cost the earth... I was in the middle of emailing for print quotes and posting on MR at the same time and just hurriedly threw back an answer.

Don't get too thin-skinned about it. It's not personally directed except at some of the more irrational posts in this thread from people who are wailing and gnashing their teeth at the injustice of it all... Join your local college for night-classes and get an edu license if that's what you need.

Saying that, I agree with you. There's certainly space for an InDesign Elements and possibly an Illustrator Elements, maybe we might see some developments soon.


If you really know about Quark (the company) that has an entirely different meaning...

Who? Fred?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.