Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,793
31,263


Health technology company AliveCor has praised the International Trade Commission (ITC)'s ban on sales of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 in the United States.

apple-watch-ecg-wrist.jpg

AliveCor, like Masimo, accuses Apple of violating its patents related to heath technology used in the Apple Watch. While Masimo's fight focuses on the Apple Watch's blood oxygen sensing capabilities, AliveCor contends that Apple is in breach of patent with its ECG technology.

AliveCor demonstrated a prototype Apple Watch band with a built-in ECG sensor to Apple in 2015. Apple then unveiled its own built-in ECG technology in 2018 with the Apple Watch Series 4, leading AliveCor to argue that Apple had stolen its technology and request that the ITC bans Apple Watch sales in the United States. AliveCor also initiated an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging that it was making it needlessly difficult for third-party apps to access the Apple Watch's heart rate data.

In a statement to 9to5Mac, AliveCor expressed its support for Masimo and praised the move to ban Apple Watch sales:

This is the second time in less than 12 months President Biden has allowed an International Trade Commission Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) to stand against imports of Apple Watches that violate the patents of small U.S. innovators. Earlier this year, AliveCor's patent for its FDA-cleared personal electrocardiogram (ECG) technology was similarly affirmed and we share our support today for Masimo's tenacity in its face off with Apple. Innovator companies and health consumers alike should be encouraged that industry giants are increasingly being held accountable for anticompetitive practices that would ultimately limit access to potentially life-saving technology.

The ITC ruled in favor of AliveCor's patent infringement claims, but the case did not result in a ban on Apple Watch sales as AliveCor hoped. Unlike AliveCor, Masimo argues that Apple actively hired its engineers and key executives to steal technology.

Article Link: AliveCor Praises Apple Watch Ban Amid Its Own Health Tech Patent Dispute With Apple
 

alchemistmuffin

macrumors 6502a
Dec 28, 2007
730
701
Unlike AliveCor, Masimo argues that Apple actively hired its engineers and key executives to steal technology.
Which is totally legal to some extent. Competition is key. This patent troll clearly wants to kill the competition through this lawsuit.

POTUS is probably going to regret not vetoing this ban come next November. Silicon Valley and Apple evangelist will make it known.

Also, probably likely this is going to Supreme Court in the end. No way Apple is going to let this stand and if court rules in favor of that patent troll company, it’s not only going to affect Apple but Google and Samsung as well, basically making smart watches useless. (I’m sure Samsung and Google probably have some patent violation from that patent troll company that they are unaware of)
 

Sorinut

macrumors 68000
Feb 26, 2015
1,670
4,557
POTUS is probably going to regret not vetoing this ban come next November. Silicon Valley and Apple evangelist will make it known.

The President absolutely made the correct decision. This veto power is keep goods flowing vital to the country (national security, military, etc.), not to pat a company on the back for being American. In additon, both companies are American.

Masimo is not a patent troll. They make medical devices, have for years, and have been producing SpO2 sensors longer than Apple has been using them. We use 20-50 of the Masimo sensors daily here at work (hospital). Every single hospital in North America uses their devices...and that's not an exaggeration.

What makes you think the Supreme Court would even take up this case?
 

Quu

macrumors 68040
Apr 2, 2007
3,423
6,824
The President absolutely made the correct decision. This veto power is keep goods flowing vital to the country (national security, military, etc.), not to pat a company on the back for being American. In additon, both companies are American.

Masimo is not a patent troll. They make medical devices, have for years, and have been producing SpO2 sensors longer than Apple has been using them. We use 20-50 of the Masimo sensors daily here at work (hospital). Every single hospital in North America uses their devices...and that's not an exaggeration.

What makes you think the Supreme Court would even take up this case?
Indeed and according to Apples own internal emails which were turned over during discovery, they knew Masimo had what they needed. They considered purchasing the entire company but Tim Cook made the final decision to not buy them and to instead poach as many engineers as needed to replicate their technology.

They even opened a building down the street from Masimo so their employees wouldn't have to uproot their families if they joined Apple.

In this situation, Apple thought they'd get away with it and I'm glad they're not. Don't think for even one second that Apple would let another company do this to them when they infringe an Apple patent, of which Apple files between 5,000 and 9,000 patents per year.
 

alchemistmuffin

macrumors 6502a
Dec 28, 2007
730
701
The President absolutely made the correct decision. This veto power is keep goods flowing vital to the country (national security, military, etc.), not to pat a company on the back for being American. In additon, both companies are American.

Masimo is not a patent troll. They make medical devices, have for years, and have been producing SpO2 sensors longer than Apple has been using them. We use 20-50 of the Masimo sensors daily here at work (hospital). Every single hospital in North America uses their devices...and that's not an exaggeration.

What makes you think the Supreme Court would even take up this case?
Well, they’re acting like patent troll. And so far their intention is to kill the competition. If the patent troll wanted to make things work, why did they make initial offer that only benefits them and not both Apple and them?

As for SCOTUS, considering the unbalanced makeup of the judges, they will take the case. They are all about large business and money. And the patent troll company have nothing when it comes to defending themselves in SCOTUS based on how they have acted so far.

Also, Wall Street and Silicon Valley people likely isn’t happy about SCOTUS decision to veto this, and they’ll make sure to let him know that he made the wrong choice on this come November next year.
 

Sorinut

macrumors 68000
Feb 26, 2015
1,670
4,557
Well, they’re acting like patent troll. And so far their intention is to kill the competition. If the patent troll wanted to make things work, why did they make initial offer that only benefits them and not both Apple and them?

As for SCOTUS, considering the unbalanced makeup of the judges, they will take the case. They are all about large business and money. And the patent troll company have nothing when it comes to defending themselves in SCOTUS based on how they have acted so far.

Also, Wall Street and Silicon Valley people likely isn’t happy about SCOTUS decision to veto this, and they’ll make sure to let him know that he made the wrong choice on this come November next year.

SCOTUS doesn't veto, or not veto this, the President does. "Silicon valley" doesn't vote for the president, the people do. They (silicon valley) already have waaaaay too much influence, and as far as I'm concerned, can get bent.

Both companies are large businesses. Masimo is a 35 year-old $7-10 billion company with around 10k employees; they aren't as big as Apple, but they aren't tiny. In addition, they are well-liked and respected in the medical devices community; look for several other big medical companies, with very very large pockets, to come to their defense/aid if it makes it that far.

I will say again, they are not a patent troll. A patent troll is a company that holds a patent but never builds, or has any intention, of building a devices based on said patent, but enforces their rights to it.. Masimo produces more of these sensors in a week than Apple does in a year, and have been selling them for longer than the Apple watch has had said sensors. I would have to check, but I think they have been producing them longer than the Apple watch has existed as a whole.
 
Last edited:

H2SO4

macrumors 603
Nov 4, 2008
5,674
6,953
SCOTUS doesn't veto, or not veto this, the President does. "Silicon valley" doesn't vote for the president, the people do. They already have waaaaay too much influence, and as far as I'm concerned, can get bent.

Both companies are large businesses. Masimo is a 35 year-old $7-10 billion company with around 10k employees; they aren't as big as Apple, but they aren't tiny. In addition, they are well-liked and respected in the medical devices community; look for several other big medical companies, with very very large pockets, to come to their defense/aid if it makes it that far.

I will say again, they are not a patent troll. A patent troll is a company that holds a patent but never builds, or has any intention, of building a devices based on said patent. Masimo produces more of these sensors in a week than Apple does in a year, and have been selling them for longer than the Apple watch has had said sensors.
When I hear things like this it always makes me think of;
Apple patents belong to 34137 unique patent families. Out of 95500 patents, 78104 patents are active.
Are apple also patent trolls? Do to they intend to do anything with the 20-25% of inactive patents held?
 

gsurf123

macrumors 6502
Jun 1, 2017
472
848
The writing is on the wall for medical device companies. Silicon Valley is coming for their low hanging fruit such as what the watch can do and soon blood sugar levels. SV can outmaneuver and develop the legacy medical companies and the days of insanely priced medical devices will come to an end. Apple and others will play the long game and win.

I suspect completely new methods/hardware will be used in future watches to stamp out Masimo.
 

gsurf123

macrumors 6502
Jun 1, 2017
472
848
The President absolutely made the correct decision. This veto power is keep goods flowing vital to the country (national security, military, etc.), not to pat a company on the back for being American. In additon, both companies are American.

Masimo is not a patent troll. They make medical devices, have for years, and have been producing SpO2 sensors longer than Apple has been using them. We use 20-50 of the Masimo sensors daily here at work (hospital). Every single hospital in North America uses their devices...and that's not an exaggeration.

What makes you think the Supreme Court would even take up this case?
There is no medical device company that is well-liked. They have been ripping off insurance companies (ultimately us) since they opened their doors. Charging massive amounts of money for devices as simple as knee braces all the way up to implants and there supposedly never being any economy of scale for production.
 

Sorinut

macrumors 68000
Feb 26, 2015
1,670
4,557
There is no medical device company that is well-liked. They have been ripping off insurance companies (ultimately us) since they opened their doors. Charging massive amounts of money for devices as simple as knee braces all the way up to implants and there supposedly never being any economy of scale for production.

I said well liked in the medical device community, or I should have. Consumer sentiment has no play or say here, on either side.
 

ThailandToo

macrumors 6502
Apr 18, 2022
429
755
Which is totally legal to some extent. Competition is key. This patent troll clearly wants to kill the competition through this lawsuit.

POTUS is probably going to regret not vetoing this ban come next November. Silicon Valley and Apple evangelist will make it known.

Also, probably likely this is going to Supreme Court in the end. No way Apple is going to let this stand and if court rules in favor of that patent troll company, it’s not only going to affect Apple but Google and Samsung as well, basically making smart watches useless. (I’m sure Samsung and Google probably have some patent violation from that patent troll company that they are unaware of)
Neither of these companies is a patent troll… Apple is a thieving bully… love their products not their business practices… Apple’s internal motto must be, “we can out litigate any of these tiny idiots!”

So glad Biden didn’t give Apple a pass, as that would have been the wrong message to bullies everywhere. It would have been like saying keep on bullying, stealing and use your position of power to destroy any competition to Tim and his executives.
 

nicho

macrumors 601
Feb 15, 2008
4,217
3,210
Masimo produces more of these sensors in a week than Apple does in a year

There's hyperbole and there's... this.

Apple shipped 50 million Apple watches in 2022. For Masimo producing more in a week to be true, that would mean they produce 2.6 billion sensors a year, which is kinda wasteful since they only get used on 200 million patients a year (per their own investor docs).
 

mdatwood

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2010
919
908
East Coast, USA
The writing is on the wall for medical device companies. Silicon Valley is coming for their low hanging fruit such as what the watch can do and soon blood sugar levels. SV can outmaneuver and develop the legacy medical companies and the days of insanely priced medical devices will come to an end. Apple and others will play the long game and win.

I suspect completely new methods/hardware will be used in future watches to stamp out Masimo.

This is the correct answer regardless of what happens in this specific case. I looked up some jobs for Masimo and the salaries are laughable compared to big tech. Now that big tech has turned their sights on these types of devices, companies like Masimo are about to be drained of talent (which is what happened here).
 

Sorinut

macrumors 68000
Feb 26, 2015
1,670
4,557
There's hyperbole and there's... this.

Apple shipped 50 million Apple watches in 2022. For Masimo producing more in a week to be true, that would mean they produce 2.6 billion sensors a year, which is kinda wasteful since they only get used on 200 million patients a year (per their own investor docs).

We use 20-50 of their sensors per day in our 300 bed hospital. At the last hospital I worked at, which was a 500 bed facility, we used double that.

Do the math.
 

JapanApple

macrumors 65816
Sep 16, 2022
1,303
4,260
Japan
There is no medical device company that is well-liked. They have been ripping off insurance companies (ultimately us) since they opened their doors. Charging massive amounts of money for devices as simple as knee braces all the way up to implants and there supposedly never being any economy of scale for production.
frankly speaking our right. Since these devices are only an assumption of what a person's body is vital etc. When making this remark about smartwatches
 

Sorinut

macrumors 68000
Feb 26, 2015
1,670
4,557
Their forecast healthcare revenue for the year is $1.3 billion. The cost of those sensors is?

Wholesale is about $100/box of 100 sensors from a wholesaler. I have no idea what Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen or the like pays.

I don't work in procurement, so I can't offer much more.
 

nicho

macrumors 601
Feb 15, 2008
4,217
3,210
Wholesale is about $100/box of 100 sensors.

Meaning if they made more in a week than Apple do in a year, and didn't make any other, more expensive equipment they'd have revenues of $2.6b a year.

Which they don't.

Edit: it's rather frustrating how you keep hitting post and then editing more information in afterwards. I'm leaving this conversation here: I don't dispute that they make more - a lot more - sensors than Apple, but it's 100% incorrect to suggest they make 2.6 billion+ of them a year.
 

MauiPa

macrumors 68040
Apr 18, 2018
3,430
5,080
When is enough enough on technology patents. alivecor tries to pretend they invented ECGs, they did not, they did not invent single lead sensors, nor anything else, so how is their patent even enforceable? Before the Apple Watch, I had a cheap handheld ECG sensor that I used. according to AliveCor, No one should be able to use that. When I get marketing materials from them - in the trash they go. Provide some real benefit and patent something that you actually developed that is not in the public domain, like using leads to measure ECGs (been around for decades).

That being said, I support patents for things people actually invent, but adapting existing technology does not seem to count. It seems like there might need to be a rewrite of the patent system to cover modern issues. LOL, that won't happen, it would actually be meaningful.

OK, even if you disagree with the premise of the patent, the company was still able to get it. So rightly or wrongly they should be able to license it (except patent trolls) at reasonable fees.
 

spazzcat

macrumors 68040
Jun 29, 2007
3,729
4,896
Neither of these companies is a patent troll… Apple is a thieving bully… love their products not their business practices… Apple’s internal motto must be, “we can out litigate any of these tiny idiots!”

So glad Biden didn’t give Apple a pass, as that would have been the wrong message to bullies everywhere. It would have been like saying keep on bullying, stealing and use your position of power to destroy any competition to Tim and his executives.
Masimo is also acting like a bully. People seem to keep ignoring the fact that Masimo has already has several patents invalided and the rest are being review and fact that Apple holds patents for the tech they are using in their watch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.