Some serious "outside of the box" thinking. To paraphrase 'The Architect': not being limited by the boundaries of perfection certainly opens up a few doors… =)
Have you emailed Sir Ive your suggestions to the imperfections in the Mac Pro design?
I contacted Amfeltec to obtain pricing and they told me that Gen 3 is not compatible with Mac Pros.Thought I'd share this. Went to the Amfeltec website and saw they introduced more Gen 3 M.2 carrier boards. The two that caught my eye were the 2 slot and 4 slot boards. The slots seem wider now so maybe less spacing issues. Not sure if these support AHCI or NVME SSDs - my guess they are NVME only?
2 slot: http://amfeltec.com/products/pci-express-gen-3-carrier-board-for-2-m-2-ssd-modules/
4 slot: http://amfeltec.com/products/pci-express-gen-3-carrier-board-for-4-m-2-ssd-modules/
I contacted Amfeltec to obtain pricing and they told me that Gen 3 is not compatible with Mac Pros.
"Thank you for your interest in our products. Please note that we recommend to use Gen2 Carrier board for Mac Pro users because old Mac doesn’t support Gen 3 multi-modules Carrier board properly.
You can use or 2 SKU-086-31 or SKU-086-01."
Just be weary that using that kind of bandwidth frequently on that poorly cooled X58 chipset will reduce the life of the system. Apple's implementation already runs 20C above Intel recommendations.
Some serious "outside of the box" thinking. To paraphrase 'The Architect': not being limited by the boundaries of perfection certainly opens up a few doors… =)
Have you emailed Sir Ive your suggestions to the imperfections in the Mac Pro design?
The former would mean a PCIe 3.0 SSD could still achieve full bandwidth plugged in to a PCIe 2.0 motherboard.
Kingston HyperX Predator M.2s
Spam!
Mac Fan Control is all you need.
Well, some people prefer to pay for software. Free sometimes also means "quickly abandoned". I didn't view it as spam, just as a paid alternative.Well, you're the only one who will NOT see it as Spam!
Sandforce based? Personally, I'd run a mile from these.Thanks to Barefeats. I saw their recent tweet where the posted speed of the Kingston Digital HyperX Predator PCIE. It comes in 480GB and 960GB flavors, and given their pricing looks like a good alternative to the Samsung SM951s. Initial tests by Barefeats show really good performance for an AHCI PCIE SSD. I would just buy 4 - rip out the SSDs and put them all in an Amfeltec card.
Sandforce based? Personally, I'd run a mile from these.
Always look for the telltale sign of 240, 480 and 960GB capacities.
If so, performance using compressed data, such as video files, will be garbage.
I'd just be sure you know what you're getting before buying 4 of them
could you elaborate?
I believe these use Marvell controllers - it's on the specsheet and on the Amazon page as well.Sandforce based? Personally, I'd run a mile from these.
Always look for the telltale sign of 240, 480 and 960GB capacities.
If so, performance using compressed data, such as video files, will be garbage.
I'd just be sure you know what you're getting before buying 4 of them
I believe these use Marvell controllers - it's on the specsheet and on the Amazon page as well.
They are Marvell. I'll be honest, aside from the basics I don't necessarily know what some of the specs below indicate aside from the obvious ones, speed, expectancy, TBW, IOPS...
Or, to put it better, how some of the benchmarks translate, if they indicate these are crap etc... I'd be curious if anyone know how they compare at least on paper... datasheet here: http://www.hyperxgaming.com/datasheets/SHPM2280P2_us.pdf
From the manfacturers data sheet:
- Interface PCIe Gen 2.0 x4
- NAND MLC
- Controller Marvell 88SS9293
- Baseline performance2
Compressible Data Transfer (ATTO)
240GB — 1400MB/s Read and 600MB/s Write
480GB — 1400MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write
960GB — 1350MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write
Incompressible Data Transfer (AS-SSD and CrystalDiskMark)
240GB — 1290MB/s Read and 600MB/s Write
480GB — 1100MB/s Read and 910MB/s Write
960GB — 1300MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write
IOMETER Maximum 4k Read/Write
240GB — up to 160,000/ up to 119,000 IOPS
480GB — up to 130,000/ up to 118,000 IOPS
960GB — up to 160,000 / up to 126,000 IOPS
Random 4k Read/Write
240GB — up to 120,000/ up to 78,000 IOPS
480GB — up to 117,000/ up to 70,000 IOPS
960GB — up to 111,000 / up to 72,000 IOPS
PCMark® 8 Storage Score
240GB — 5,015
480GB — 5,017
960GB — 5,045
Anvil Total Score (Incompressible Workload)
240GB — 6,500
480GB — 6,700
960GB — 6,800
- Life expectancy 1 million hours MTBF
- Total Bytes Written (TBW)
240GB — 415TB 1.6 DWPD4
480GB — 882TB 1.7 DWPD4
960GB — 1600TB 1.8 DWPD4
Well, you're the only one who will NOT see it as Spam!
And presenting an unknown App you have to pay for vs the free App that has proven itself....hmmmm hard choice.
Well, some people prefer to pay for software. Free sometimes also means "quickly abandoned". I didn't view it as spam, just as a paid alternative.
Has anyone bought one of these recently? Cost seems to have gone up to $367 (plus $50 international shipping on something that can't weigh more than a few grams). I'm still tempted, but if and when it hits customs, the final price is really going to stack up.
Definitely going for the 960GB models.
Also, my Squid is a x16, so performance shouldn't be a problem, even if i put it into the x8 slot