would you be comfortable using your bank / crypto apps and work emails on a phone that doesn't have the latest security update / patch?Why? If my phone still works in 5 years, I'll simply... keep on using it. No one is forcing anyone to upgrade.
would you be comfortable using your bank / crypto apps and work emails on a phone that doesn't have the latest security update / patch?Why? If my phone still works in 5 years, I'll simply... keep on using it. No one is forcing anyone to upgrade.
The population of the UK is only 67m, so…Not really, the UK is dominated by iPhones. Top 5 beta selling devices in the UK are also iPhones. Android have a lot of users and the low budget devices certainly helps a lot with this
Yeswould you be comfortable using your bank / crypto apps and work emails on a phone that doesn't have the latest security update / patch?
The population of the UK is only 67m, so…
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide
If anything then iOS is in decline.
interesting. good for you. I am not brave enough to use a phone that doesn't have the latest security patch. Going by the Android subreddit, a lot of people are upset at Android's updates. Also with iOS not allowing other apps to track you, unless Android does the same (which is very unlikely), more and more people will move away from Android
There are many Android phones such as Oppo that doesn't have that problem, also Samsung releases security updates and I have 2 year old Huawei which still gets updates ( I use iPhone 12 mini as my main phone), but it still receives updates.interesting. good for you. I am not brave enough to use a phone that doesn't have the latest security patch. Going by the Android subreddit, a lot of people are upset at Android's updates. Also with iOS not allowing other apps to track you, unless Android does the same (which is very unlikely), more and more people will move away from Android
Most people in the countries I've lived use Samsung and not cheap ones. I am kind of alone with my iPhone. I really dont know anyone that would use iOS or macOS.if anything it shows how many low end android phones that’s on the market. Mid to high end phones the iPhone will always dominate. The 300-400 price is what helps android dominate overall sales. When hundreds of phones are out each user at different price points a company like Apple which brings out 4-5 phones a year the numbers are always going to be off
The phones people talk about and are promoted the iPhone is still the market leader. Generally iPhones sell more in the first weekend to launch than most flagship android phone sell all year. Just the way it is and why countries like US and UK the iPhone is the main phones to buy
would you be comfortable using your bank / crypto apps and work emails on a phone that doesn't have the latest security update / patch?
I was really surprised that iOS 15 will support the iPhone 6S…
thats a phone over 6 years old when iOS 15 releases.
compare that to Galaxy S6 or the bootloop king LG G4 that released the same yearWhen the iPhone 7 launched I ended up going for the 6S instead which nearly 5 years on is being used by my daughter with a new battery. That phone is an absolute beast and scarily fast after all these years .
All due respect though but a S8 still works fine to this day for many it's just not getting any updates. I understand the security measures and people "want to be certain" but when you log onto your bank your going through their encryption measures so you have security on that device for the things that matter mostly like money.Why? If my phone still works in 5 years, I'll simply... keep on using it. No one is forcing anyone to upgrade.
But do those upper midrange Android phones have better processor, camera, water resistance, wireless charging, security than the 'low end' iPhone? for equal features, you have to go for 'ultra' flagships which cost upwards of 1k.I have two issues with iPhones. First, they are very restrictive, unlike Android-based units. Second, they are insanely expensive for the paltry specs. $699 is a low end iPhone price: it's an upper midrange Android price.
Samsung's midrange phones get updates for 3 years (major Android upgrades) and security updates for 2 years. My guess is you'd upgrade your phone by that time no matter what.The biggest issue with Android, as I see it, is what's termed "fragmentation". Many phone makers don't care about anything but selling product, and so to that end do as little as possible to support or update deployed units. That's a major part of why Google several years ago had to start unbundling things from the OS itself and do independent component updates.
I have two issues with iPhones. First, they are very restrictive, unlike Android-based units. Second, they are insanely expensive for the paltry specs. $699 is a low end iPhone price: it's an upper midrange Android price.
compare that to Galaxy S6 or the bootloop king LG G4 that released the same year
Just fyi, my iPhone 5s crashes and is lagging a lot + battery is bad. My Sony Xperia L has no issues.An old fella where I work has an S6 and I recently had to help him with something on it. That phone is so laggy now and I couldn’t use it pwrsonally. My old 6S is still handling tasks very well.
A 1GB RAM Android phone? come on!!Just fyi, my iPhone 5s crashes and is lagging a lot + battery is bad. My Sony Xperia L has no issues.
Yup, works pretty smoothly, but software has been out of date for years, but it's really smooth. Runs KitKat. My Motorola has 2GB of RAM and is way slower than my Sony (not joking). Also, Xperia L has still better battery than the iPhone 5s.A 1GB RAM Android phone? come on!!
Just fyi, my iPhone 5s crashes and is lagging a lot + battery is bad. My Sony Xperia L has no issues.
My Sony Xperia hasn't received updates in years, but it's still fast is what I said. My old Motorola receives updates though, but it has Android 9 and it's from 2018. Still quite good for $100 phone and now Samsung devices start receiving 3 OS upgrades +2 years of security updates.That’s good to know. I was talking about the S6 because someone else mentioned it. It’s good to know these old devices still get the latest updates.
There are more on updates on Android than "oh it gets x years of updates."That’s good to know. I was talking about the S6 because someone else mentioned it. It’s good to know these old devices still get the latest updates.
Depends.It depends on the area. Even in SE Asia, in bigger cities, you would almost feel everyone uses an iPhone. It has changed a lot in last few years - since Samsung started charging insane prices for their flagships that just get 3 years of updates
I think that's a sad statement, we should (and many of us do) enjoy our privacy without needing to live off the grid. I think you're wrong that using technology requires that we give up all of our personal details. I for one work at protecting my privacy and its not very hard.People complaining about privacy and those sorts of intrusions into their lives should go live like the Amish. Go off the grid and more or less abandon any kind of electronics-involving technology.
This is also a reminder whenever the likes of Oppo or Vivo are trying to sell their phones for $1000 (Oppo Find X3 Pro is about $1100 in my country). No way jose. Paying $1000 for only 1 year of software support at best is ridiculous. Might as well get an iPhone if you have that kind of money.
You forgot to add that Oppo releases new phones all the time. People bash Apple for releasing phones (which isn't often at all), but Oppo releases new versions of their phones all the time.There are more on updates on Android than "oh it gets x years of updates."
First, there's the Android version upgrade. Most Android phones would get at least one major version upgrade. Only Pixel and Samsung that promised 3 years of upgrades. The rest like Oppo, Vivo, etc are so inconsistent that most of their mid-rangers and lower don't even get a single version upgrade. (this is why I balked when these companies are trying to charge $1000 for their flagships. Complete waste of money as they have zero track on software support).
Then there's monthly security patches. Google send these monthly patches to OEMs 1 month in advance very month. Again, Pixel and Samsung lead the way. But for Samsung, it's not the complete story. Only their flagship lineups (S series, Fold series, Note series) get the security patches monthly, with few exceptions on models that has enterprise ready status. The rest of the lineup, even the premium A7x series, only get the security patches quarterly. To me this is unacceptable since Google has made it so easy to apply these patches. Security patches are that, security patches. There should not be any reason to not apply them in a timely manner. This is why I decided to go all the way, traded in my A71 to an S21. As for the Chinese, they are inconsistent. Many do give security patches, but there's almost no pattern to it.
Oh and for Samsung promising 4 years of security patches? Cross that out. Just read it as 3 years of security patches. Why? The 4th year is biannual delivery, meaning you will only get 2 security patches in 1 year. That's just BS. It's better than nothing, sure, but again, Google has made it so simple to apply these. It's so easy that some OEMs were caught that they just changed the text to fool users into thinking they have the latest security patches, without actually applying the patch. These attitude towards security is inexcusable imo.
In short, best of the best on Android are still Google Pixel and Samsung with 3 years of software updates. Still a far cry from Apple, obviously. This is also a reminder whenever the likes of Oppo or Vivo are trying to sell their phones for $1000 (Oppo Find X3 Pro is about $1100 in my country). No way jose. Paying $1000 for only 1 year of software support at best is ridiculous. Might as well get an iPhone if you have that kind of money.