I bet that Fire 10 cost under $200? That is what would be considered a budget Android tablet.
iPad 9th gen offers a lot of value in terms of tablets and it is hard for Android OEM to truly compete. The Samsung Galaxy s6 lite is an attempt to answer this segment. Both are excellent tablets in their category. I think if you would have bought a s6 lite you might have had a different experience.
Now if you had a high end Android tablet like the Tab s9 then you would have 5 years of support. Most Samsung tablets come with 5 years updates.
Good thoughts! 👍
I just picked up a Tab S6 Lite ($249 USD) on Saturday. (I had given my Tab S6 to my wife a year and a half ago, and I switched to an iPad 9th gen) I'm impressed with the quality and performance. I'm still using my 9th gen iPad as a chromebook replacement, but there are just some things about Samsung's Android tablets that I miss. DeX and the S-Pen being just two.
Having extensive experience with cheap Chinese android tablets and Amazon Fire tablets, I concur with your statement that trying the S6 Lite would result in a difference experience.
I have owned a few Chrome OS tablets (still own one, original Lenovo Duet) and still own a clamshell Chromebook and a 2-in-1 convertible chromebook. Attempting to use any Chrome OS device as a tablet replacement for Android tablets have not been a good experience.
Chrome OS still doesn't handle Android apps well. As just one example, the Android filesystem is sandboxed from Chrome OS (keyholed on external storage like USB drives and SD cards) so that requires some planning as to where files will reside if you will be using Chrome OS and Android apps to operate on those files.
Having the Android container running on top of Chrome OS takes a performance hit (compared to devices running Android natively). This is where one needs to plan out how they will be using their Chrome OS device and choose accordingly. ARM-based Chrome OS devices run Android apps a bit better (more stable, better performance) than Intel-based devices. But for Chrome OS-centric tasks (and Linux app support) Intel-based devices are a bit better. The difference isn't dramatic, but it can be noticeable at times.
I've been a Chrome OS user from near the beginning of the platform and one disturbing trend (for me) that I've seen over the past 3 years has been the proliferation of subscription SaaS. That isn't something new or unique, but with the internet-focus of Chrome OS it makes it easier to spread. As a result there are fewer to no non-subscription alternatives.