There seem to be a lot of minutia rules now. Way more grey area that makes the rule book far too complicated. If those in charge cannot decide what is a violation maybe the rules have become too complex.
I don't think it's a matter of not being able to decide, but rather that now and then something will come up that isn't as cut and dried as we'd like. In that case we discuss, and if we can't reach a consensus, we don't moderate (as mentioned earlier, and as per the discussion
@TiggrToo linked to
in her post just above).
This site has stricter rules than some - that's a choice. And the rules have become somewhat more complex as the site has grown and we've gained experience of nuance. We know that some users will decide that they prefer to post on sites with fewer rules, and that's fine. Choice is a good thing.
At the end of the day, users will generally be fine if they post polite comments and don't make negative, sweeping generalizations about groups.