That’s ********. Aluminum may cost more (I haven’t investigated this myself) but it feels cheap. No way would I ever want that if I’m paying for a pro model. I like the weight of the current 12 Pro Max.Makes no sense when aluminium is a more premium material. You've fallen for marketing hype.
I’m not a material sciences expert, but as per my quick research, aluminium is actually cheaper than Stainless steel. Atleast the polished stainless version which I’m guessing is what Apple uses for their Pro models.Makes no sense when aluminium is a more premium material. You've fallen for marketing hype.
They should use lead to make it feel even more premium, and satisfy the ones who think weight=quality.Society in general usually treats steel as more precious than aluminum. Maybe you don't individually, and I'm not trying to invalidate your opinion, but go look in any field - stainless steel products/materials are more expensive and more desired. It's what's "in" and trending with consumers. The amount of people who are complaining about stainless steel edges on a phone are extremely outweighed by overall shopping habits.
There are many, many, many people who don't think of Infiniti or Acura as "luxury" but that doesn't change the fact that in the general consensus of the consumer. Because you exist in an echo chamber of similar opinion does not mean that opinion is that universal.
Nobody's telling you not to enjoy aluminum or to value it as premium. Not a single person said their opinion didn't count.
Meanwhile, the other side is essentially insinuating that anyone who thinks of stainless steel being more premium is brainwashed/tricked by advertising. Is it projecting? Or maybe coping? Maybe it's both? Maybe it's Maybelline
I second titanium. I love my titanium Apple Watch. Durable and lightThey should never have used steel. Adds weight. Maybe they will go to titanium for the pro models in the future.
I have 2 aluminum iPhones and 3 stainless steel iPhones. Whenever I hold my 12 Pro Max, which is my daily driver, it feels more premium than when I switch to using my 7+ or SE 2020. I’m not going by marketing. I’m going by how the phones feel in my hands when I am using them. What I meant by price, is if I’m paying $1k plus for a phone, I want the stainless steel vs aluminum for the premium feeling I feel with the stainless steel. If it’s more expensive than aluminum, that’s fine and dandy, but TO ME stainless steel feel more premium than aluminum. I have every right to have that opinion and feel that way just like however you feel about it.
The price of 7000 Series Aircraft Aluminum is a known based on current contracts.
It’s hard to compare with the Surgical Stainless Steel in the iPhone as Apple does not list if it‘s Grade 304 or Grade 316. Both are Surgical Grade, however 316 is higher priced.
I can’t find any link to identify which.
You all have a lot of emotional investment into a material that compromises a very small part of the phone.
A lot of very opinionated people with condescending tones.
You all have a lot of emotional investment into a material that compromises a very small part of the phone.
A lot of very opinionated people with condescending tones.
I guess it's a bit irrelevant now as we're unlikely to see this sort of thing again, but I always thought the super light iPhone 5/5s felt really premium and futuristic at the time when most phones were chunky, heavy plasticky things. It's easy to make something heavy, much more difficult to make it surprisingly light.They should use lead to make it feel even more premium, and satisfy the ones who think weight=quality.
I also should have been more satisfied with the 40kg bike i once had, it surely had a superb premium quality.
I guess it's a bit irrelevant now as we're unlikely to see this sort of thing again, but I always thought the super light iPhone 5/5s felt really premium and futuristic at the time when most phones were chunky, heavy plasticky things. It's easy to make something heavy, much more difficult to make it surprisingly light.
To me it seems a lot of people are just substituting 'heavy' for 'solid/ well built'. Something can feel very solid but also lightweight, like the iPhone 5 series, weight in and of itself (to me) isn't an indicator of quality. Given it takes more effort to make something light than it does to make it heavy, and for something like a phone lighter is actually a practical benefit, it surprises me that people actually value weight itself in this scenario. For something like Gold Jewellery I could understand, but when Apple have made two near identical versions of a phone, and one is heavier just because it uses a different metal finish, that seems a bit of a retrograde step to me, not something to be prized?The heavier and shinier perspective seems common but also the suggestion of moving to titanium which will be comparable to aluminium in terms of being lightweight. Once you have a case on your iPhone then the difference or advantage from an aesthetic point of view disappears. It’s the same when someone says stainless doesn’t dent as easily as aluminium which is absolutely correct. If your iPhone is on a case then neither dent as easily either. It’s interesting to see the different perspectives here and perceptions of what ‘quality’ and ‘premium’ means to them.
I’m quite happy with aluminium as for me it’s a premium material, lightweight and is covered in a case 100% of the time. It’s quite irrelevant in terms of how it looks on my iPhone as the only parts you can see are the speaker grills and a 1.5mm border surrounding the charging port lol.