That's the most ridiculoous patent I have ever heard. Universal search is a given. A
My GS3 got updated and losing universal search. I dont miss it but your right, it is ridiculous.
That's the most ridiculoous patent I have ever heard. Universal search is a given. A
Wouldn't it mean that Samsung is evil by using Apple's patents without license, which they should have known since they were already being sued for using these patents in their older products?
Or does it mean that Samsung is just _stupid_ for doing this?
----------
Of course they can't, since (1) all the LTE patents must be licensed under FRAND terms, and (2) Apple holds a _huge_ number of LTE patents themselves since they purchased Nortel's patent portfolio on which any Samsung LTE phone would be infringing.
And I'm truly fascinated by your logic. So Samsung keeps up with Apple by stealing Apple's IP, and Apple is the one who isn't innovating?
I don't think a lot of people hate Apple, I typically don't care about branding. But as of late, Apple's behavior as a company shows me they are not really interested in updating their software/hardware in any large way. They are more interested in getting competitors products banned and winning money in lawsuits, over patents that should have not been granted in the first place.
...and evolving their current product line. Face it, they're not going to make anything new for a while, and there's no need to anyway. They need to wait for new technology to come out first.
What I'm getting at, is they've refused to add a larger/better screen. They've refused to go to a different form factor ( kinda ), they're refused to update iOS in any major way, besides making maps....worse. They really have not done anything snice 2007 imo, then they wonder why the competition who brings out new OS's all the time, all of which have been great since gingerbread imo. Start eating into their sales.
They don't update everything, they don't follow what people want. They sue.
Personally, I think I am gonna keep my personal phone Android, I'll support free and open source before I support a closed source sue happy company.
Because adding a larger screen and maxing out the RAM is totally innovative and new, right? Nobody is making anything really new. The original iPhone was new, and iOS 2 had major new features. The iPad was not really new, but it opened up a new market. The iPhone 4 had a great new design, but there were no new features there and only minor improvements after iOS 2. It just seems like "new" at this point would just be some bad change just for the sake of change. I wouldn't say that Google copied iOS in Android, but Android is nothing new or original. Nor have the Android phone makers been innovating at all, and a few of the designs are clear copies.
Either way, I don't care who is innovating when I choose my phone. I could get a Nexus with a big screen, removeable battery (bad), more power (OK), and open-source OS (I don't go manually hacking my phone, so I don't care), or I could get an iPhone 4 with a smaller screen (Ok for me), built-in battery (more battery life and better looks), and a walled garden OS (I jailbreak for sketchy apps) that syncs nicely with my PC and works with the Apple TV and Airport Express. I went for the iPhone 4. Maybe it's not what you want, but for people like me and most people I know, the iPhone has pretty much everything wanted. Even if I used an Android phone as my personal device for some reason, I'd still also get an iPhone since iOS apps can get many customers for tech companies.
Because adding a larger screen and maxing out the RAM is totally innovative and new, right?
The original iPhone was new
The iPad was not really new, but it opened up a new market.
The iPhone 4 had a great new design, but there were no new features there and only minor improvements after iOS 2. It just seems like "new" at this point would just be some bad change just for the sake of change
I wouldn't say that Google copied iOS in Android, but Android is nothing new or original. Nor have the Android phone makers been innovating at all, and a few of the designs are clear copies.
I wouldn't say that Google copied iOS in Android, but Android is nothing new or original. Nor have the Android phone makers been innovating at all, and a few of the designs are clear copies.
Agreed, I buy the best phone for the job.Either way, I don't care who is innovating when I choose my phone.
How is a removable battery bad? I go out into the field alot, and sometimes I'm out all day, texting, calling and emailing for work ( which alot is done on my work 4S, but then there are times when I have to use my phone due to the iphones dead battery ), having a removable battery is great, I can just swap it out for another battery, and be at 100% again, I do it all the time.I could get a Nexus with a big screen, removeable battery (bad)
More power is good for software, and an Open Source OS imo is just a good thing, google makes a small amount of money off android, but I like how they give it away for free.more power (OK), and open-source OS (I don't go manually hacking my phone, so I don't care),
or I could get an iPhone 4 with a smaller screen (Ok for me)
built-in battery (more battery life and better looks),
and a walled garden OS
Maybe it's not what you want, but for people like me and most people I know, the iPhone has pretty much everything wanted.
Even if I used an Android phone as my personal device for some reason, I'd still also get an iPhone since iOS apps can get many customers for tech companies. That lame Instagram company sold for $1G, and their success is due to their iOS app.
Because adding a larger screen and maxing out the RAM is totally innovative and new, right? [...] The iPhone 4 had a great new design
You can't state both these things with a straight face. The iPhone 4 was as different from the 3GS as Android handsets are from their previous generation.
You need Kool Aid Logic.
iOS 2, adding " revolutionary features " like MMS! [...] And Copy and waste
You need Kool Aid Logic.
iOS 2, adding " revolutionary features " like MMS!!!! : 3G And Copy and waste and GPS
Is what really makes the iPhone more innovative than Android, which is really stuck in the 90s. They can't seem to inviolate on the same level as Kool Aid.
( For the slow, I am being 100% sarcastic )
You can't state both these things with a straight face. The iPhone 4 was as different from the 3GS as Android handsets are from their previous generation.
Those are both iPhone OS 3 features. iOS 4 brought background wallpapers and multi-tasking. iPhone OS 2 brought... *drumroll*, the App Store.
iOS updates have mostly been more incremental and "catching up" than innovative and ground breaking.
I'm still laughing ... this just struck me as sooo funnyCopy and waste..
Those are both iPhone OS 3 features. iOS 4 brought background wallpapers and multi-tasking. iPhone OS 2 brought... *drumroll*, the App Store.
iOS updates have mostly been more incremental and "catching up" than innovative and ground breaking.
And yet Android still cannot get any of those features right. Sad really.
Android has had all those features since version 1.0. Not to mention, to this day, their multi-tasking is much more efficient and their wallpapers are animated.
I want animated wallpapers too on my 4S.
I don't think a lot of people hate Apple, I typically don't care about branding. But as of late, Apple's behavior as a company shows me they are not really interested in updating their software/hardware in any large way. They are more interested in getting competitors products banned and winning money in lawsuits, over patents that should have not been granted in the first place.
Android has had all those features since version 1.0. Not to mention, to this day, their multi-tasking is much more efficient and their wallpapers are animated.
I want animated wallpapers too on my 4S.
But something tells me those live wallpapers, along with just about everything that goes on within the Android system, kill your phone in a matter of hours.
Icons were just evidences that pointed out Samsung copy Apple design. I think Samsung had intention to copy Apple and Google has warned Samsung. But Samsung took no response. Some of them that were used by Apple to claim in court room were silly such as rectangular with round conner design, icons etc. However, in the big picture, Samsung did have intention to copy Apple and I think when you guys look at a big picture. You can't refuse Samsung's intention. Jury was looking at this perspective to judge this case. You just can't refuse that Samsung did not copy Apple. I just can't say that and we all know. I am not a big fan of Apple.
Icons were just evidences that pointed out Samsung copy Apple design. I think Samsung had intention to copy Apple and Google has warned Samsung. But Samsung took no response. Some of them that were used by Apple to claim in court room were silly such as rectangular with round conner design, icons etc. However, in the big picture, Samsung did have intention to copy Apple and I think when you guys look at a big picture. You can't refuse Samsung's intention. Jury was looking at this perspective to judge this case. You just can't refuse that Samsung did not copy Apple. I just can't say that and we all know. I am not a big fan of Apple.
So basically what Apple is saying is that if even one patent is violated on a smartphone, the entire product has to be banned right?