Surely that would be “campI”, more appropriatelyGreat for Texas residents. Now it would be nice to look at other states that don't have campuses.
Surely that would be “campI”, more appropriatelyGreat for Texas residents. Now it would be nice to look at other states that don't have campuses.
What do they all do? So many employees and so little output.
I don't fully understand this. I'm not saying its wrong, but they just finished a multibillion spaceship looking building in campus that probably has so much room to spare, why not use that
What do they all do? So many employees and so little output.
[doublepost=1544713924][/doublepost]The data centers are totally green.
Apple on Thursday announced it will invest $1 billion to build a new campus in Austin, Texas.
Located less than a mile from its existing facilities, the 133-acre campus will initially accommodate 5,000 additional employees, with the capacity to grow to 15,000, which would make Apple the largest private employer in Austin.
In its press release, Apple said jobs created at the campus would include a wide range of functions, including engineering, R&D, operations, finance, sales, and customer support. At 6,200 people, Austin already represents the largest population of Apple employees outside Cupertino.![]()
One of Apple's existing facilities in North Austin
In addition to the new campus, Apple announced plans for a general expansion of operations over the next three years in cities across the United States, including Pittsburgh, New York, and Boulder. Apple also said it will establish new sites in Seattle, San Diego, and Culver City.![]()
The announcement caps a year of continued job creation for Apple. The company added 6,000 jobs to its American workforce in 2018 and now employs 90,000 people in all 50 states. In January, Apple said it was on track to create 20,000 jobs in the U.S. by 2023.
Apple said it also plans to invest $10 billion in U.S. data centers over the next five years, including $4.5 billion this year and next.
Article Link: Apple Announces Plans to Build $1 Billion Campus in Austin, Texas
Apple does sell a minimal amount of great quality products. We agree on one point but not the other.I thought the same thing. For the minimal amount of products they sell, there are an awful lot of people working for Apple. It'd be one thing if their quality was great or they were churning out products quickly, but neither are happening.
Apple's most recent quarter of $63 billion in sales, up 20% from last years quarter, and, its guidance of approx $90 billion for the next quarter, indicate otherwise.
Probably not so great for Texas. apple probably got a sweetheart tax break to move it here. Look at California - how is having apple and Google in California working out for them? Oh, it's not. Homeless, outrageous cost of living, ...Liberals.
Apple does sell a minimal amount of great quality products. We agree on one point but not the other.
How many people do you think should work at Apple based on your preconceived notions of quantity, speed and quality?
Apple's most recent quarter of $63 billion in sales, up 20% from last years quarter, and, its guidance of approx $90 billion for the next quarter, indicate otherwise.
The proof is in how you interpret reports
Unit sales are flat lining in growth. Revenue increasing due to higher ASP. It’s why Apple does not want to share unit sales anymore in their narrative. They probably shouldn’t have shared it in the first place
Yep, understood, but they're investing a billion dollars, so they're spending a billion to save hundreds of millions?
It's a different pot of money.![]()
This seems great on the surface, but I'm concerned that the influx of Californians will have a negative impact on Texas' state capital, the health of the region's real estate market, taxes, and traffic. Plus, Austin has already lost a significant portion of its charm.
I hope we can find balance with this level of change.
Because companies tend to concentrate.Why doesn't Apple open buildings in some of the "flyover" states? Seems to me that the costs would be much lower for them and their employees. If I could get a good job with Apple I wouldn't mind moving to, say, Montana.
Who says they are declining? There are many reports saying this, but where’s the proof?
This has already been happening in Austin for quite some time. Haven't looked in awhile, but the city is continuously at or near the top of the fastest growing cities in the country.Yes, and like happened in Cupertino, property values (and living costs) will likely skyrocket once the facility opens. Time will tell.
Apple does sell a minimal amount of great quality products. We agree on one point but not the other.
How many people do you think should work at Apple based on your preconceived notions of quantity, speed and quality?
Tech companies tend to move where technical/engineering/r&d is mostly located. That generally involves close proximity of major research universities, which both California and the northeast have aplenty. Austin happens to have the University of Texas at Austin, which is a major science/tech hub for the central Texas area, with Rice University (Houston) and Texas A&M not far away. As Dell has been doing since the 90s, my guess is that Apple will develop a close relationship with U.T. after the facility opens.Why doesn't Apple open buildings in some of the "flyover" states? Seems to me that the costs would be much lower for them and their employees. If I could get a good job with Apple I wouldn't mind moving to, say, Montana.
Having top universities is not generally enough for getting more than a small office.Tech companies tend to move where technical/engineering/r&d is mostly located. That generally involves close proximity of major research universities, which both California and the northeast have aplenty. Austin happens to have the University of Texas at Austin, which is a major science/tech hub for the central Texas area, with Rice University (Houston) and Texas A&M not far away. As Dell has been doing since the 90s, my guess is that Apple will develop a close relationship with U.T. after the facility opens.
You do stop reporting unit numbers if you want to change the valuation of the stock. By focusing on units, wall street has been missing the big picture.You don't simply stop reporting unit sales numbers when they are on the rise.