I've got a PHEV right now, and it's a decade old. My next car will be BEV. This car was a good compromise as far as what was available for a reasonable price at the time, but I'm seeing used Chevy Bolts for $10k now, a few more years and prices on used Mustangs will be in the range I'm willing to pay.
I've had a couple of HEVs, a PHEV, and a couple of BEVs. There is no going back, BEVs are by far the best solution unless one has some very special needs. PHEVs are better in theory than in practice; they tend to be quite lousy EVs and having a dual drive system doubles the number of possible failures.
Hydrogen isn't going anywhere. I think long haul trucks will go BEV, they still have to stop long enough to allow driver rest anyway. For "it must keep moving" with driver swaps it would be as quick to swap a battery or the entire truck cab unit anyway.
I am talking about the cost balance. Hydrogen fuel cell is expensive, hydrogen tank not so much. Battery cost has a linear relation to capacity, electric motors are not that expensive. If you need to lug 1 MWh of exergy (electricity in battery or enough chemical fuel to produce 1 MWh of mechanical work) with you, chemical storage may have significantly lower capital cost.
This, of course, needs to be balanced with higher operating costs due to higher fuel price. I am looking at different long-term projections regarding energy transition as part of my daily work, and I do not think we know the right answer, yet. My personal guess is synthetic methane for long-haul trucking. It may also depend on country and location, and it will depend on battery development.
Biofuel is probably going to be the answer for jets. It makes a lot more sense than hydrogen or synthetic.
Biofuel sounds good only as long as you are not really trying to find sustainable biofuel sources. True, we have the technology to squeeze jet fuel out of spruce, but at the same time we have plans on using the same biomass for chemical production (plastics and replacements), pulp&paper (all those cardboard boxes), construction, etc. And also at the same time, we would like to increase the carbon storage in biomass either as a short-term storage (delayed harvesting) or as a permanent storage in, e.g., biochar or BECCS.
Making synthetic SAFs (sustainable aviation fuels) will be quite expensive. Flying will become more expensive than it is today. There are, however, very few alternatives.
And I have yet to see a company get the driver interface software/OS/UI right. Apple could develop something that makes sense and license it.