Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
WHAT?
Huawei has cars, Xiaomi has cars (only took less than 3 years to develop), Sony probably will have cars, and Samsung will probably follow. And dare I say, those cars are really good.

It’s just not hard to produce good electric cars now in 2024. And Apple can provide a LOT with good iOS integration.

Is it just that Apple couldn’t innovate and build anything new anymore? And there are so many good electric cars Apple can copy.. ahem.. learn from and differentiate with ecosystem integration.

This is very sad
The lukewarm response to Vision Pro must have spooked them. Can't take multiple failures in short periods, I guess.
 
LMFAO

classic Tim.

His legacy will be a watch that was fashion focused but lucked out with health, failed headset, tired old designs and millions wasted on a car that never was.

Siri is horse poop, imagine trusting an Apple self driving car.
The watch was already in the roadmap when Steve passed. As of now, Tim's legacy is the Vision Pro.
 
Apple doesn’t have battery tech, too late to catch up with vision based autonomous driving system and with margin squeezed by Chinese EV brands, it’s not the product for Apple. Perhaps if it had a product 6 years ago, they’ve missed it on the timeline. Good, put all that money into things Apple is good at.
 
They are inefficient and don’t have good ranges before they need time consuming charges. And they aren’t green.
EVs are massively more efficient than ICEVs.

They are green. Yes, it takes more energy to produce them initially but, because of their efficiency, it only takes about 12K miles to pay off the energy investment and start to use less energy.

Electricity production is greener than burning gasoline. With an EV, even if you are running from a power grid that is 100% coal, it still is only responsible for about the same CO2 as a 50mpg ICEV. Very, very few power grids are that dirty. The average US power grid uses less than 18% coal and that number is dropping every year.

A lot of EVs have ranges around 300 miles. That is about what our gas powered vehicle gets. The better EVs can top off the battery from 10% to 80% in about 20 minutes. Newer battery chemistries promise faster charges. Most EV drivers can just plug in at home and are fully charged every day. The fast charging is mainly useful on road trips. That charging network still has some holes but is building out rapidly.
 
The watch was already in the roadmap when Steve passed. As of now, Tim's legacy is the Vision Pro.

But can Tim double down? This is the milk squeezer. We dabble in stuff and maybe keep dabbling away. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn’t. But the main plan is squeezing iPhone and company for all she’s got.

I can hear Tim now to the iPhone group. We need warp 10 now to beat estimates.

I’m giving it all she’s got Timmy. Chinas giving us problems again.

Well we need it now. Do a new color if you have to. And stop calling me Timmy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Morod
Thats it thats the last straw. Apple board needs to step in and fire Tim right away. Do it fellas!
Why? A car was always a long shot and the return on investment did not seem very big. It’s probably for the best that they drop that money pit and can focus resources on more useful products.
 
not surprised given the current EV narratives are collapsing. Other factors aside the environmental cost and damage of production of batteries, coupled with the loss of efficiency in cold weather are the latest facts in a large scale retraction from the EV cult.
Don’t get me wrong EVs definitely have a bespoke niche, particularly in urban environments, but not to the scale that Apple would require to make it a viable investment. Happy to see them drop this nonsense and get back to the business of making consumer electronics as a primary goal.
You can’t even begin to compare the environmental cost of battery production to the massive environmental cost of oil extractions, processing, and burning. The impacts of battery production are relatively small scale and localized. Oil is an enormous industry and we are only now coming to grips with the environmental impact from that.
 
Good. The project would have been a big departure from Apple’s core. I think they feel pretty confident they will own the VR/AR market which will provide enough revenue to support growth with a stagnant/declining iPhone market.

I think the car project was more of an unfocused search for the next revenue growth driver than a concentrated effort on disrupting an industry - at least after Tesla’s success in the space. When Apple embarked on the car project, Tesla was nothing: they didn’t have a mass market car, they didn’t own the charging space, they didn’t have self driving capabilities, quality sucked, company was losing money. All of that changed during Apple’s car project. Apple was simply too late, Tesla won and this decision to cancel the car project further solidifies Tesla’s position as the Apple of the car market.
 
I talked at length with a Tesla rep about switching batteries. He said that they tried it in the last decade between LA and San Francisco and got disappointing results. No one wanted to swap out their new batteries for unknown batteries. Those who had older vehicles were all for it, but not those with relatively new ones. It would take a comprehensive and expensive new battery program that included replacement and some sort of leasing system to make it work.

Chinese claims on range and charging are suspect. I doubt if consumer “complaints” are legit. 😉
The way to fix that is to sell them without batteries. You get a used one from the dealer when you buy your car and then it's just like swapping propane tanks on a grill after that. It would also help with the resell value because the car would not take a hit for a diminished battery and you could just roll your deposit / battery core charge into a battery for your new car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey
Why? A car was always a long shot and the return on investment did not seem very big. It’s probably for the best that they drop that money pit and can focus resources on more useful products.

If an e car was magic I have a few clients who lost their tail on such stocks. Lucid comes to mind. lol.

Streaming videos was another hot item when Apple announced. Now they make too much content with most having problems. Netflix solved temp with ads but the same problem will creep back.

Now it’s AI. Except nvidia is the only one showing any growth from it selling chips. This will go boom later. It’s not like Apple is selling chips to others. But the market hears AI and that should soothe them for a bit.

Chasing unicorns. Why wasn’t Siri a priority all along? Nvidia and ChatGPT flew right by Apple.

I like the headset if it can be refined and Apple doubles down on content. This remains to be seen. Because Apple doesn’t exactly double down on things.

Back to basics. Apple is iPhone. Leverage it. Extend the system. Mac is 10-15% at most of pc market. Get that iPhone fold going. None of this is growth territory it’s just squeezing things. Squeeze harder.

I mean seriously we’re hearing iPad on a HomePod rumors. Really Tim?
 
That is a different case. Long term I yes go on the assumption that most people can get 4-5kw chargers where they live. If you own a home you can easily add the requirement to get a charger at home.

In a cold climate again still not a range that going to affect lv2 over night charging for a vast majority of the usage.

Most of the arguments people give for anti EV is the 1% argument. The 1% of the time an EV makes things slightly harder or slower compared to the 99% EV win out.

I think you are making an incorrect assumption as far as most people being able to use a 4-5kw charger.

I suppose that I could get a 1000+ ft extension cord and put if from my apartment window down to the parking lot :).
 
If an e car was magic I have a few clients who lost their tail on such stocks. Lucid comes to mind. lol.

Streaming videos was another hot item when Apple announced. Now they make too much content with most having problems. Netflix solved temp with ads but the same problem will creep back.

Now it’s AI. Except nvidia is the only one showing any growth from it selling chips. This will go boom later. It’s not like Apple is selling chips to others. But the market hears AI and that should soothe them for a bit.

Chasing unicorns. Why wasn’t Siri a priority all along? Nvidia and ChatGPT flew right by Apple.

I like the headset if it can be refined and Apple doubles down on content. This remains to be seen. Because Apple doesn’t exactly double down on things.

Back to basics. Apple is iPhone. Leverage it. Extend the system. Mac is 10-15% at most of pc market. Get that iPhone fold going. None of this is growth territory it’s just squeezing things. Squeeze harder.

I mean seriously we’re hearing iPad on a HomePod rumors. Really Tim?
Enhancing the iPhone is likely to be the point of Apple’s push into AI. Making complex operations simpler. Making it easier to use the features of the phone And get better results out. Doing a straight up ChatGPT clone does not seem like something Apple would care to do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey
I think you are making an incorrect assumption as far as most people being able to use a 4-5kw charger.

I suppose that I could get a 1000+ ft extension cord and put if from my apartment window down to the parking lot :).
67% of Americans live in homes that they own. Apartment are a smaller group. If we could get those homeowners to adopt and EV that would be a big improvement. That gives us more time to work on access to charging for those in apartments.
 
The lukewarm response to Vision Pro must have spooked them. Can't take multiple failures in short periods, I guess.

I was going to post this same thing but thought better of it. That said, I completely agree. Plus, it appears to me that they used a lot of the R&D from the car project in the headset already. No reason to double down on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beautyspin
The way to fix that is to sell them without batteries. You get a used one from the dealer when you buy your car and then it's just like swapping propane tanks on a grill after that. It would also help with the resell value because the car would not take a hit for a diminished battery and you could just roll your deposit / battery core charge into a battery for your new car.

Fast swap batteries seem like a great idea.
 
I literally said this recently in other post that I think Apple is no longer designing a car, but they want to implement better CarPlay functionality into cars and possibly even their in-house chips to power some functions in cars kind of how NVIDIA powers some cars important systems.
 
Of course there are. Battery technology is rapidly evolving. We’re not going to stay with Lithium forever.

The EU decided to switch the entire EU-fleet to electric by 2035. They wouldn’t have passed this legislation if the tech wouldn’t be there.
When that time comes (which doesn’t appear to be in the next 10 years) we can have that conversation.

You’re putting your faith in legislators to predict the future of battery tech? I really hope you don’t invest that way.

ICE will be here in 2030. Likely more efficient, but it will still be 75% if the market. Maybe by 2040, we’ll finally have hydrogen vehicles.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
67% of Americans live in homes that they own. Apartment are a smaller group. If we could get those homeowners to adopt and EV that would be a big improvement. That gives us more time to work on access to charging for those in apartments.

That 67% of “homeowners” includes people who own/live in an apartment….

Maybe you mean 66% of Americans have a garage or carport?
 
When that time comes (which doesn’t appear to be in the next 10 years) we can have that conversation.

You’re putting your faith in legislators to predict the future of battery tech? I really hope you don’t invest that way.

ICE will be here in 2030. Likely more efficient, but it will still be 75% if the market. Maybe by 2040, we’ll finally have hydrogen vehicles.
You seem to be under the impression that we have the luxury to leapfrog a couple of tech cycles to switch to the perfect transportation vehicle. Read the climate reports. We don’t. We’re still driving cars with century old tech. Time to move on. Even if batteries are not perfect.
 
Because
Yes, the EU managerial clique in Brussels would NEVER EVER issue mandates that aren't reasonably reachable and that aren't the best practical solution for the citizens of the EU! They're the smartest, most forward thinking administrators (read: egotistical petty corrupt power-hungry nitwits) ever!
They created the single market and free movement of people, brought peace for over 75 years, just voted for the nature restoration act, gave us free roaming, introduced the most stringent privacy laws in the world, … the list is endless. Seems like you’re describing one of the 2 parties in the US.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.