gpapava said:Original radial blur test.
1m 48sec![]()
![]()
Powerbook 1.67MHz 1.5GB ram
Photoshop CS
Wasnt it TOO fast for my pbook??![]()
Wow, those do seem like great times for a PowerBook!
gpapava said:Original radial blur test.
1m 48sec![]()
![]()
Powerbook 1.67MHz 1.5GB ram
Photoshop CS
Wasnt it TOO fast for my pbook??![]()
spinne1 said:Well, I went to Adobe's site and downloaded the 30 day trial of CS2 to see if there will be any difference. [as a nice sidenote, my download from them was at 425-450 KB/sec--way to go Comcast!]
With CS2: 6 minutes, 50 seconds.
With 3.0.1 in Classic mode: 14 minutes, 57 seconds.
Needless to say, there is a difference!
revenuee said:originally over 14 minutes with photoshop CS running on OS 10.2, G4 400mhz 40 gig 2mb cache drive, 832 megs of ram
NOW ... just over 2 minutes with 1.6 ghz powerlogix processor upgrade. 1.25 gigs of ram 120 gig 8 mb cache hard drive and OS 10.4
hell of an improvement for 400$
mongoos150 said:I'm amazed - I just got my Intel iMac (2.0 GHz 1.5GB ram, 256vram) and ran the test - 49:02!!! I was expecting Photoshop CS to c-r-a-w-l but it's performing 2.5x better than my previous powerbook! I'm extremely impressed, I can't wait to see how it performs once Adobe releases UBs - I bought this system to be my pro mac for years to come, looks like it will be doing a superb job![]()
Wuzz said:8 mins 20 secs
iBook G3 600Mhz
640 MB RAM
Adobe Photoshop 7.0
I really should upgrade at some point![]()
mongoos150 said:I think it's amazing my Intel machine is nearly matching monster G5 systems - Jobs was crazy when saying a pro wouldn't want to run CS on an Intel mac at the moment...
johnnybluejeans said:So I got my extra gig of RAM today and what a difference it made!
Chuck1 w/ 512Mb: 1:21s
Chuck1 w/ 1.5Gb: 18s
Chuck2 w/ 512Mb: 7:02s
Chuck2 w/ 1.5Gb: 2:53s