Hi everybody
I'm new to this kind of forums but i thought i should share some of my results with u here cause i fill like some of u are over excited about their machines
so I run the test on my new mac pro 2.66 and also a new 24" imac and finally my poor but lovely 15" powerbook 1.33 they are all running 10.4.8
Mac pro 2.66/2g/500wd/256m NVIDIA 7300
CS2: 1:02
CS3: 36 sec
24" imac 2.16/2g/250g/128m NVIDIA 7300
CS2: 1:55
CS3: 58 sec
15" Powerbook G4 1.33/1g/60(4200rpm)/64m ATI9700
CS2: 6:55
when connected to an external firewire800 as scratch the result was 6:12
I still have 1.8 Dual G5 untested and next week I'm buying a macbook so next week I can give u a full list of benchmarks.
I just want to tell u that the Mac pro is so fast that it runs CS2 like the 24" imac running CS3 as u can see from the results (only 4sec difference) also worth mentiong that the powerbook did run well until the Gaussian blur action which took him almost 3 minutes to finish
but maybe its a ram issue.
I'm new to this kind of forums but i thought i should share some of my results with u here cause i fill like some of u are over excited about their machines
so I run the test on my new mac pro 2.66 and also a new 24" imac and finally my poor but lovely 15" powerbook 1.33 they are all running 10.4.8
Mac pro 2.66/2g/500wd/256m NVIDIA 7300
CS2: 1:02
CS3: 36 sec
24" imac 2.16/2g/250g/128m NVIDIA 7300
CS2: 1:55
CS3: 58 sec
15" Powerbook G4 1.33/1g/60(4200rpm)/64m ATI9700
CS2: 6:55
when connected to an external firewire800 as scratch the result was 6:12
I still have 1.8 Dual G5 untested and next week I'm buying a macbook so next week I can give u a full list of benchmarks.
I just want to tell u that the Mac pro is so fast that it runs CS2 like the 24" imac running CS3 as u can see from the results (only 4sec difference) also worth mentiong that the powerbook did run well until the Gaussian blur action which took him almost 3 minutes to finish