Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think that many of you are confusing lossless with HiFi.
Lossless is CD quality. If you load a ripped CD in WAV format to your Mac, iPhone or iPod touch, they'll play it back because those PCs and devices have DACs that support the 16bit@44.1KHz playback resolution. Wireless headphones need compression to keep up with the stream of data, so no lossless for you there.
If you jump to 24bit@48, 96 or 192KHz resolution, that's HiFi and you'll need a decent outboard DAC to listen to some differences because your PC or device does not include a DAC that supports said playback resolutions. Expect to find very small differences in reverb tails, maybe wider stereo imaging and a bit more contrast in loudness vs. quiet perception. All of these you'll get if the mixer does not compress the hell out of the musical piece.
If your perception is mild to dramatic differences between a regular lossless or good quality mp4 file when compared to a HiFi file, the culprit is the mixing and mastering process, not the recording/playback resolution. Same applies between vinyl and CD. Different mixing and mastering processes.

EDIT: DAC means Digital to Analog Converter, and it's a piece of hardware that interprets digital information and converts it to electrical impulses that get sent to a speaker, resulting in sound.
 
This is just annoying and confusing. All my critical listening stuff is attached to my PC which uses windows and foobar2000. I use my Apple Pro Max headphones for work with my MacBook pro. So if I'm correct I will need to move all of my critical listening gear over to my MacBook Pro, and buy a USB-A to USB-C dongle and hope my DAC has mac drivers to actually use this? Then I can give my girlfriend my APM headphones cause I won't be using them for work, and I won't be using them for after-work listening... I am confused why I bought these then :(
 
  • Sad
Reactions: darkslide29
Just do what I do and ignore the lossless stuff. As for the spatial audio, hopefully this can be toggled off if sounds like garbage. Otherwise, much ado about nothing.
 
This entire announcement went from exciting to confusing to just annoying, at least for me.

Excited about the spatial audio thing, the lossless is probably not anything my aging 47-year-old ears would be able to hear anyway.

Still, there had to be a different way for Apple to roll out this announcement, right?
The big announcement was the widespread support of Spatial Audio with Dolby Atmos. This is what most Apple Music users will care about the most. Lossless / Hi-Res Lossless was gravy on top for those audiophiles that care about this feature.
 
I beleive there is a bit of a false narrative being created around HomePods not supporting lossless. I can not find any direct statement to that effect on the Apple Music site. However, this is pretty common knowledge to anyone who has looked into it:

Both HomePod models support lossless FLAC and Apple Lossless:

"Audio Formats
HE-AAC (V1), AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), protected AAC (from iTunes Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Apple Lossless, AIFF, WAV, and FLAC. " https://www.bechtle.com/shop/medias...FiMDM5YTQyMGYyZDcyNjQ5MTI5NDNlMzRiN2ExNGYzMTk

and this for airplay: "AirPlay does not compress audio; it converts it to Apple Lossless, which is then played back on the target device". https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/contributors/what-airplay-2-means-for-your-listening-setup-r717/

I cannot find any non-sketchy sites which detail the sampling rate for Airplay 2, some say 48 kHz and others say 96 kHz. if the 48 kHz is correct, you will be able to play the lossless tier, but not the hi-res lossless tier. However, this has nothing to do with playing music directly on the HomePods of course.

so I am remaining unconvinced until there is an official apple statement.
 
Is spatial audio really that big of a deal with headphones? I don't see how, when using headphones, it could be made to feel more "spatial", but I'm a bit of a layman in this area for sure.
 
Here is what Sonos had to say about this:

"We’re unable to confirm when/if this feature is coming to Sonos. It’s up to the music service provider (Apple in this case) to work with us and decide which features are/are not available on Sonos products. We’ve written an article explaining a lot about Music Services on Sonos that I’ll link below that contains some more information on this. You should let Apple know that you’d like to see spatial/lossless audio on Apple Music on Sonos
:slight_smile:
"
 
Is spatial audio really that big of a deal with headphones? I don't see how, when using headphones, it could be made to feel more "spatial", but I'm a bit of a layman in this area for sure.
Go to Youtube and do a search for Virtual Barber Shop and try it. It really is amazing! Don't forget to put on your AirPods.
 
Here is what Sonos had to say about this:

"We’re unable to confirm when/if this feature is coming to Sonos. It’s up to the music service provider (Apple in this case) to work with us and decide which features are/are not available on Sonos products. We’ve written an article explaining a lot about Music Services on Sonos that I’ll link below that contains some more information on this. You should let Apple know that you’d like to see spatial/lossless audio on Apple Music on Sonos
:slight_smile:
"
Mhhh… the comment is probably out of the Sonos community forum, right?

In my opinion this don’t sound quite official.

Let‘s wait and hope.
 
Apple TV not being one of the Hi-Res devices is disappointing and strange. HDMI is fully capable of 24-bit 192 kHz audio.

By the same token, there's really no excuse for HomePods to not support lossless (up to 24-bit 48 kHz), when it already supports ALAC and even FLAC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmw1480
We all know original HomePod has been discontinued.

My guess..... There will be some new "Home Bar" which will be a sound bar with full Dolby Atmos and Lossless support (and will have an AppleTV interface built in). So basically, one HDMI cable between the bar and your TV and you get the whole thing.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmw1480
It would have been better if they thought out this issue months or maybe even years in advanced so that their headphones will support it. Kinda a silly move on Apple's Part
 
This is just annoying and confusing. All my critical listening stuff is attached to my PC which uses windows and foobar2000. I use my Apple Pro Max headphones for work with my MacBook pro. So if I'm correct I will need to move all of my critical listening gear over to my MacBook Pro, and buy a USB-A to USB-C dongle and hope my DAC has mac drivers to actually use this? Then I can give my girlfriend my APM headphones cause I won't be using them for work, and I won't be using them for after-work listening... I am confused why I bought these then :(
As long as your USB DAC is "class-compliant"(which they usually are), there is no need for any additional drivers. It'll just work. Both USB Audio Class 1 and 2 have been supported on Macs for a long time (the latter is required for listening to higher resolution files) and the same is true for Windows 10 these days, which used to require drivers for UAC2.
 
A+ for this article because I was confused. I'm just happy Apple added these features without raising the price, especially since the lossless feature won't work with our wireless headphones.
 
I get that this is a niche service to keep and maintain or draw in new subscribers, but I have used Ogg in the past as well as other Lossless codecs and the difference can really only be heard on a full stereo setup in a living room.

Every time I have tried on a Harmon Kardon or Bang and Olufsen headset, the difference is negligible and mostly there for people to be snobs. It's kind of like putting truffles in a Mac and cheese. Sure, it has truffles, but that's all you can taste. Lossless doesn't work on headphones due to their small tweeters, and lackluster bass.
 
Apple TV not being one of the Hi-Res devices is disappointing and strange. HDMI is fully capable of 24-bit 192 kHz audio.

By the same token, there's really no excuse for HomePods to not support lossless (up to 24-bit 48 kHz), when it already supports ALAC and even FLAC.
ATV is supported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bereit and jmw1480
I beleive there is a bit of a false narrative being created around HomePods not supporting lossless. I can not find any direct statement to that effect on the Apple Music site. However, this is pretty common knowledge to anyone who has looked into it:

Both HomePod models support lossless FLAC and Apple Lossless:

"Audio Formats
HE-AAC (V1), AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), protected AAC (from iTunes Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Apple Lossless, AIFF, WAV, and FLAC. " https://www.bechtle.com/shop/medias...FiMDM5YTQyMGYyZDcyNjQ5MTI5NDNlMzRiN2ExNGYzMTk

and this for airplay: "AirPlay does not compress audio; it converts it to Apple Lossless, which is then played back on the target device". https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/contributors/what-airplay-2-means-for-your-listening-setup-r717/

I cannot find any non-sketchy sites which detail the sampling rate for Airplay 2, some say 48 kHz and others say 96 kHz. if the 48 kHz is correct, you will be able to play the lossless tier, but not the hi-res lossless tier. However, this has nothing to do with playing music directly on the HomePods of course.

so I am remaining unconvinced until there is an official apple statement.

Same here. It doesn´t make any sense whatsoever that the Homepods dont support this...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmw1480
I checked prices on a DAC and it can get really expensive and makes the Air Max headphones seem really inexpensive. There is no way I am going to spend that much money on lossless audio when I can't even hear any difference. Just going to enjoy the sound of uncompressed audio from my iMac M1 speakers at full volume for free.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.