I do here in the U.S., where there are free speech protections written into our Constitution. Protections that have been repeatedly affirmed by our Supreme Court.You do not have the right to make abusive, hateful, racist comments to others.
Is it now? Ever heard of the term "misgendering?"It’s obvious to any grown-up with a functioning moral compass what is going to be taken as offence to the person they’re directing it to.
Good for you. I, likewise, would not be inclined to do so, either, unless provoked.1. I wouldn’t say anything that would be offensive to your religion to you.
Of course, what provokes me is entirely subjective—just like what others may find offensive is.
I'm a grown-up boy. I wear big boy pants and everything. I've long outgrown the need for somebody else to protect me from the verbal slings and arrows of others.2. The law would punish anyone from doing so, so it’s there to protect YOU, just as much as it’s there to protect THEM, from YOUR hate speech. See how that works?
I neither need nor want a nanny to protect me from the verbal assaults of others.
You are hopelessly naive. That is not an insult. That is my opinion, based upon what I perceive as your view of the world.3. I don’t decide what is, or is not offensive, or that falls within a legal description of hate speech. But I don’t need to walk around with a cooy of the rules, since being an adult I use a thing called common sense.
See above. There's your answer. Too many like that in a position to vote. That's how. And they didn't "allow" it. They asked for it.This is WILD! Absolutely unbelievable! UK residents why do you allow your government to do this? Wow....
Yeah: I don't understand it, either.
The only reason Herr Starmer and his Internet Storm Troopers are getting pushback now is they attempted to extend their speech and thought policing to the entire planet. A non-UK company and non-UK citizens are telling them to sod off.