Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In fact, they appear to already be zipped, so they've taken a leaf out of Microsoft's book in that regard (the Office 2007/2008 format is the same).
Or out of Sun's OpenOffice book. XML is great for interoperability, but leaving text uncompressed is really rather dumb when you can so easily ZIP it and cut the file size in half. :)
 
Waste of my time. I didn't need these updates. Lets see new Minis or Mac Pro upgrades. The computers that really matter. Glad to see the iphone wasn't mentioned this time. Kind of tired of hearing about it.

Wasn't posting about hardware in a software thread also a bit of a waste of your time, too?


Glad to see iWork updated, although I don't use 08 enough to justify it at the moment. I'm also glad the rumours of iWork going web-based were wrong.
 
The MacBoxSet implies that we won't see Snow Leopard any time soon.

That's what I'm worried about... I don't want to update to 10.5 if 10.6 is 'around the corner'. But, maybe this is a way to get rid of boxes of 10.5 on the shelf in prep of 10.6?

If I'm lucky, new imacs and Snow Leopard are coming together this spring and I can upgrade... :)
 
The American Chemical Society (ACS) has a typesetting standard for publications. This ensures that all the structures are the same size. Having chemical structures that are different sizes in different figures looks absolutely awful and unprofessional. The sizing standard is 75% reduction of the ACS 1996 standard stationary used in CambridgeSoft ChemDraw. MSWord and MSPowerpoint can do this no problem (however MSWord and Powerpoint 2008 have broken the ability to cut and paste back into ChemDraw - this bug is an issue with word and powerpoint, not ChemDraw - Awesome). Pages and Keynote cannot. They insist on handling the graphics by pixel, inch, centimeter, whatever.

EDIT: Scaling the images in ChemDraw before moving them to word or page or keynote, etc, does not work. It's not that simple. The reduction must occur within keynote and pages.

I strongly suggest looking into using Automator to do the scaling. I'm not familiar with ChemDraw, but I assume you should be able to scale the images outside of Keynote and Pages with another app. Automator makes this MUCH faster than manually selecting images and typing "0.75". You can batch resize an entire folder of pictures simply by right-clicking or dragging it to an icon.

http://pagesfaq.blogspot.com/2008/02/resizing-pictures.html

I've done this before, though I can't remember if it saves new copies of the resized images or writes over the old ones (it's probably configurable), so you may want to duplicate a folder of images first.
 
So I've noticed a few users here who are apparently running earlier versions of 10.5.x and are still able to use iWork. Is this the case?

It says I must have 10.5.6, I have 10.5.5
 
I strongly suggest looking into using Automator to do the scaling. I'm not familiar with ChemDraw, but I assume you should be able to scale the images outside of Keynote and Pages with another app. Automator makes this MUCH faster than manually selecting images and typing "0.75". You can batch resize an entire folder of pictures simply by right-clicking or dragging it to an icon.

http://pagesfaq.blogspot.com/2008/02/resizing-pictures.html

I've done this before, though I can't remember if it saves new copies of the resized images or writes over the old ones (it's probably configurable), so you may want to duplicate a folder of images first.

I shouldn't have to come up with an elaborate workaround for something that should have been built-in (and is built-in to the competition, and has been for ages) three versions ago. And this suggestion does not work. Chemdraw files are not jpgs, gifs, etc. I'll just keep using word. Sigh.
 
iWork made the keynote for me. I am very excited.

09 has almost everything I want. Plus the online collaboration is a nice addition, and I am most happy Apple was not foolish to make these webapps, but rather amazing desktop apps which are enhanced by the cloud.

iWork is turning into a killer suite. I bought 15 licenses today for my company, and if iWork 09 delivers as it is billed--speed and quality--we will buy another 85 licenses here.

Great job Apple.


Have to say I was a little disappointed by it. Not that much extra to look at but the presentation screen (where you split the screens at a presentation so you can see what's up next) was a very nice addition particularly it customisation...
 
That's what I'm worried about... I don't want to update to 10.5 if 10.6 is 'around the corner'. But, maybe this is a way to get rid of boxes of 10.5 on the shelf in prep of 10.6?

If I'm lucky, new imacs and Snow Leopard are coming together this spring and I can upgrade... :)

The fact that they didn't even mention it at the Keynote appears to indicate that it will be a while coming...
 
Agreed. I think MobileMe is overpriced for what it is, at least iWork.com inclusion in the service would provide more value. Alas, I feel that this will not be the case and Apple will be asking for even more money via subscriptions for iWork.com. I can't blame them, as it's probably a good business decision, but I still don't necessarily agree with it. An interesting item to know will be the price as well.
I believe that subscription based models will be the future.

Companies need to generate revenue.

On the Windows side, most that I know of, personal, government and corporate, have only upgraded to Office 2007 for compatibility and not for the new features. Most thought that Office 2003 provided enough functionality for what they needed to accomplish on a daily basis. There in lies the problem for Mircosoft. How will they generate revenue if no one wants to upgrade. Enter your software subscription model.

In a way, it is good for both the customer and the company. The company can introduce new features at any time and the customer will automatically receive updates. Just need to pay their monthly subscription fee. No longer do we need to wait for the major updates like we do today. This system will definitely cut down on piracy. It will also encourage companies to keep their software up to date and working in order to maintain their revenue flow because it will become easier for others to compete. Document standards will become more standard if you will. I see a lot of good coming from this.

Of course those who pirate software or don't want to pay for their software won't like it at all.

Pros and cons.
 
I shouldn't have to come up with an elaborate workaround for something that should have been built-in (and is built-in to the competition, and has been for ages) three versions ago. And this suggestion does not work. Chemdraw files are not jpgs, gifs, etc. I'll just keep using word. Sigh.
I'm not sure what you're on about, since you can obviously save Chemdraw images in a variety of formats.

And using Automator is not an "elaborate workaround". Even if you stick with Word, it'd still make your job a lot easier. The whole point of Automator is to make repetitive tasks extremely fast and simple.

You should actually try it before pooh-poohing it.
 
If it works like it says it works, then new endnote integration will effectively mean the death of ms word on my mac. Hooray!

I'm about to start my dissertation, and was praying for something like this. Word is the only program on my mac that gives me (and has ever given me) problems. The dreaded spaces issues is the least of it.

Those 2 or maybe 3 things alone are worth the upgrade (especially if I don't have to buy it): error bars in numbers (finally, come on - a chart program without error bars in the graphs...?), EndNote integration with Pages and the iPhone remote for Keynote, the latter is a nice gimmick and there are actually equally good or even better applications out there (one includes a timer and a pointer, you point with your finger on the iPhone screen and you get a pointer on the projection, moving as your finger moves on the iPhone, very cool):D
 
The addition of Endnote/MathType support is potentially huge --- writing grants (with tons of embedded figures) is sheer torment using Word, the *only* thing that kept me from going to Pages was Endnote.

Quickest way to make a research scientist swear is to ask about writing grants with Word -- try it!

I'm pretty thrilled.

JT

You are right about grant frustrations. For references, you can use Bookends instead of Endnote. It is mac centric and can read Pages files (although I don't know about the recent version). It has some features that I like better and some worse than Endnote.
 
You are right about grant frustrations. For references, you can use Bookends instead of Endnote. It is mac centric and can read Pages files (although I don't know about the recent version). It has some features that I like better and some worse than Endnote.

Totally hear that. I'm a fairly new convert, got my first Mac about 1 1/2 years ago and completely switched over ~1 yr ago. I used to pull my hair out writing evil grants (and papers) with Word (or even Open Office) and Endnote.

Bookends + Pages + Papers = blissful grant and paper writing

I cannot say enough good things about that combo and especially Papers. It keeps all my articles (and personal pdfs) perfectly organized and easily integrates with Bookends.

I can't wait to play with all the new features (though they seriously need to add in autosave in Pages). My bookstore said they should be getting both iWork and iLife in early next week for $39 each and they'll call me when they're in!
 
If I download iWork '09 from Apple's download site, do I still need to buy a serial key even though I bought iWork '08 from last year?

Also, anyone know where I can get some cheap MacBook pro 15' cases. One of those cases with the zippers, my school mac store has some pretty expensive ones: $45 to around $60!:eek:
 
If I download iWork '09 from Apple's download site, do I still need to buy a serial key even though I bought iWork '08 from last year?

Also, anyone know where I can get some cheap MacBook pro 15' cases. One of those cases with the zippers, my school mac store has some pretty expensive ones: $45 to around $60!:eek:
Yes. iWork '09 is a new product. It doesn't matter if you already bought iWork '08. A new product requires a new purchase and product key.
 
Whadda gip!

What about all of us who purchased a new unibody MBP 15 in the last month or so...shouldn't we get free upgrades?!?!
 
Full Screen

Only Apple could introduce a remedial feature, such as the ability to maximize a program screen viewing of documents (in Pages), and act as if they're the first on the block.
 
What about all of us who purchased a new unibody MBP 15 in the last month or so...shouldn't we get free upgrades?!?!
No. You have to pay again, just like everyone else.
Only Apple could introduce a remedial feature, such as the ability to maximize a program screen viewing of documents (in Pages), and act as if they're the first on the block.
Actually, it's not so much Apple as it is the fanboys. Everything that Apple adds to their applications are innovative and revolutionary.
 
iWork ground shipping not too efficient

I ordered ground shipping the day of release. It used to be Fedex ground, now it's DHL Post ground. Before it was one day delivery from Pennsylvania (Apple's shipping facility) to Maryland with Fedex. Now under DHL I just got notice that it will take 9 days to go one state!! Holiday sales must not have been as good as reported. My package is now somewhere in New Jersey and has a delivery date of 1/15. I think I'm cancelling my iLife order and just buy it in the store.
 
Numbers spreadsheet security?

Does anyone else see the need for password protection for Numbers spreadsheets? This seems like a glaring, yet easily fixed(?), problem.
 
Have the improved the performance of Numbers, or is it still dog slow? I really like the app, but can't use it for anything with more than a few rows.

I agree. They should have at least offered Sharepoint support too.
Brp. I just threw up a little in my mouth.
I've learned a lesson. Don't buy Macs or Apple software from October through early January.
I think that's part of Apples decision to pull out of Macworld.
In a way, it is good for both the customer and the company. The company can introduce new features at any time and the customer will automatically receive updates. Just need to pay their monthly subscription fee. No longer do we need to wait for the major updates like we do today. This system will definitely cut down on piracy. It will also encourage companies to keep their software up to date and working in order to maintain their revenue flow because it will become easier for others to compete. Document standards will become more standard if you will. I see a lot of good coming from this.
Subscription models are bad news for the customer-- I use a lot of high end tools that are based on yearly "maintenance" agreements and quarterly updates and basically it's a scam to extract a continuous revenue stream while completely removing the motivation of the company to update anything-- they get their money either way.
 
Help!

I'm using the demo at the moment....

Is there any way to centre the page view? If there is, I can't find it for the life of me.

Here is what I'm taking about:



The page is stuck to the left!

I want it to look something like this:



So that it is in the centre of the window (without having to zoom in)

Help, anyone?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.