OkiRun, it isn't going to be like the 5,1. Since the 5,1 was released, tech wasn't moving very fast. At best, one would see a 5% improvement in IPC and core clock speeds. We also only jumped 1 level for PCIe, from 2.0 to 3.0.
In 2019 we moved from PCIe 3.0 to PCIe 4.0. By the end of 2021, even Intel will be on PCIe 5.0. That will be a 40% jump in I/O in 36 months. CPUs from AMD are showing a 10% IPC increase for each generation, which has shrunk to a 15 to 18 month release cadence.
That isn't going to stop. Zen 3 is done. TSMC is already seeing good results on 5nm (the process for Zen 4).
AMD HAS to make hay now, because Intel will be on 10nm by the end on 2021. That $6,000 7,1 will have roughly the same performance as the upcoming PS5 and Xbox due out next year.
My 12 core Mac Pro (see sig) has a lower multi core score on Cinebench R20 than a Ryzen 2700. The Ryzen 2700 is a 65watt, 8 core, 12 thread consumer grade CPU that has already been replaced by the Zen 2 series. And those will be replaced by the Zen3 series by the end of 2020. Good news is that I can drop a Zen 3 into an AM4 motherboard.
The 7,1 is on a dead man walking socket (14nm+++).
The low end is outperformed by consumer grade silicon at the low end and HEDT silicon at the high end. And the highest end HEDT hasn't even been released yet.
Right now, it appears that if your use case needs lots of ram, but not a lot in the way of IPC, but using high clock speeds (Hi Adobe!), and OSX specific hardware, then there is actually a very good use case.
Now, if Intel had made a Xeon version of the i9-10900X series, that would have been a much better bet for a 7,1.
More PCIe lanes (4), and going with quad channel memory (256Gb max). Put it in the same 7,1 box, using an apple variant of the X299 motherboard, start with the 10 core/20 thread 3.7Ghz, CPU, sell it at $4,000. I think they would have sold a LOT.