Partner with Zeiss?? Just partner with LASIK at this point lmao
Already way to expensive for something I currently do not needWhat if prescription inserts come with a monthly/yearly subscription? 🤔
Although the Vision Pro already too expensive already this is just too much and I have myopia with corrective lenses and lifeless bifocals. I think this device will unlikely be of use to meThat’s about how much Zeiss lenses are alone. Factor in Apple tax and the magnetic bits and custom size and coatings and you’re probably looking at $1000-1500.
No, not at all. My point is Tim Cook’s Apple is not as focused on user experience and users satisfaction as Steve Jobs was.So nobody should have it? What's your point? If anybody can figure out how to make this work for the greatest number of people, it's Apple. You think Facebook can even make such a device that works for anybody?
Accessibility is tough. And being a former social worker, I know how important accessibility is, but how does that take into consideration the value of such a device for so many people?
In most states you cannot buy corrective lenses without a prescription from within the last 1-2 years.So much for Apple being known for their accessibility…
Let’s see how it goes. Remember the screen is literally a few inches in front so perhaps it won’t be necessary to correct for full long-distance vision or even presbyopia. Tim Cook most certainly is a presbyope at his age. Same with Craig Federighi.Good luck if you have an astigmatism that isn’t “off the shelf” and is outside of the most common occurrences… I suspect if you have a typical prescription then this wont be a big deal, but if you have a specialised prescription that you have to see a proper optometrist to get prescription lenses (not a mall optician) - then these Zeiss lenses are going to be very expensive…
Why would you say actually use age is less? Across the past 5 years the opposite has been true with apple. Also…it plugs directly in it just can also use a battery.The battery life is only 2 hours, which is not that good. In actual usage we will most likely get less than that.
The battery is connected separately, which makes it lighter on the head but it is also cumbersome and awkward.
All of this will need to be improved. So if I get this at all I will wait for 2nd or 3rd gen.
Don't hold your breath....the limitations of physics says it can't happen.Hopefully one day, Apple Vision will be nearly as small as regular eyeglasses.
Maps over lays in real time is AR pure goodness. I hope I can wear them and drive soon - that will be amazing. Probably tell me the speed of all the other cars. Which drivers have bad driving records. The future with this stuff will be amazing. Auto alert me of someone in intersection. Prevent accidents. Probably that stuff will not mature until after the robocarsI didn't think anybody trying that. Maybe there will be legislation passed soon to prohibit this? 🤔
Been a long time since I bought glasses but back then it was the frames that cost the most.It's going to be more than that. The lenses of my glasses cost at least that much before insurance.
Been a long time since I bought glasses but back then it was the frames that cost the most.
I think Steve would be proud of Apple today!
You are correct. The eye glass industry is run and controlled by about two companies. Why it has not been exposed more is a mystery. Two months ago a startup company had a booth in a major shopping mall here in Finland marketing their low priced frames and lenses. Your prescription is sent to their lens manufacturer in China and then they are inserted in the frame. My wife gave it a go and she received her glasses in three weeks. She has progressive lenses. The total price was 110 Euros. Her last pair from a local shop cost 900 Euros.both lens and frames are a scam. they should cost 20-30 bucks all together.
That is my case also, and I use line less bifocals also for reading fine print and such as maps when I was employed so same question I wonder if I could use as I am I read in first review they have a vision test but guy had contacts and did not need to do that. No way I am wearing contacts my eyes are too sensitive to stick things in them LOLOkay this is a dumb question but why do you need special lenses if you are nearsighted? Like, I can see things close without my glasses. And the screens are right in front of my eyes. Shouldn't I be able to see them without my glasses? Again, obviously I'm wrong here, but can someone explain why?
I have a pretty gnarly prescription (If you want to compare, it's something like OD -2.25-2.25 x 030 , OS -1.50-3.75 x 165) and had inserts made for my Oculus by a company called VR Wave for about $150 CDN. With them on, everything is pretty darn crisp.I got a pretty high astigmatism and prescription. If it’s just from -x to +x that won’t cut it. Contacts would work I guess But I don’t like to wear them for an extended time.
I'm sure companies like VR Wave will be making lenses. They do for all the other headsets, and my expensive prescription for like $150 Canadian.Zeiss ain't cheap.
There are companies that make inserts for other VR headsets, for all prescriptions... Unless you're wearing coke bottle lenses, you should be good.I have poor distance vision 20/800 and have started to need a progressive lens as I get older. I hope I will be able to even use this. Hopefully they will publish the maximum correction specifications so I can go to my optometrist and see if the headset is even an option for me.
I do wonder how easy it will be to remove for other people, when I had the first iPad and took it to my work's aircraft simulator training, people there were constantly grabbing it to try out as they had never seen one before, just saw a newspaper article or story on the news about them.