Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wish people would stop saying "Steve Jobs is rolling over in his grave" or "Steve Jobs would never..." Steve Jobs thought a pencil sticking out of the bottom of an iPad to charge it was OK. He had all sorts of bad ideas, a lot worse than touchscreen laptops.
Jobs died four years before the pencil came out. Just saying!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodhitree
Two words: finger prints.....

Just say, "NO!".

After having downgraded to an iPhone, that is what I miss the most from my Blackberry - I did not have to touch the screen.la la
My Windows work laptop has a touch screen. I’ve never touched it once, except for cleaning. It simply does not add to the utility or user experience with operating systems such as Windows or macOS.
you use it for web and office work. not for creativity with a pen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Manzanito
It’s too late for this. Even in the Windows world nobody cares about touch screen laptops. None of my users have even mentioned it in years. Around the Windows 8 time a lot of people started to get them. Most people didn’t even know they had them.

Maybe Apple will do their magic and make something happen we didn’t expect, but I don’t know. When they first announced iOS apps on the Mac it sounded great. Then every developer of every app opted out, so they could sell (or continue to sell) a more expensive Mac App Store version. Not that there’s necessarily anything wrong with that, but what was the point of iOS apps then?

Sure, nobody has to use it. But then we’re right back where Windows laptops were, where they are more expensive because of a touch screen everyone immediately forgets they even have.
everyone ? you are not working with creative apps. Sad to see all those office guys using Apple laptops today. Go buy a Windows machine. Apple was better when most users were creative people.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Tagbert
How about we get iPad running Mac OS instead? Expand the OS continuity seamlessly! ⚠️

View attachment 2171690

View attachment 2171688
Looks good. When you combine these rumors we’ve been hearing including the one about a much larger screen iPad, it does make me wonder if they are planning on the move. Could this be a separate product from the iPad?

With the advancements we are seeing in Apple Silicon, I think it is inevitable that at some point we will see an iPad running macOS (though it may not be called an iPad). For simplicity, they could go back to developing iOS for iPhone/iPad and macOS for Mac/iPad Pro, and not have a separate iPadOS. Maybe the iPad Pro gets the option to run iOS or macOS?

I was thinking “macPad” might be a cool name, but it is already in use — Mid-Atlantic Connection for PKU and Allied Disorders 😲
 
I highly doubt that Apple plans on converting the ENTIRE line to touchscreen.

If Apple goes ahead with this it will probably be a standalone model or you'll be able to add a touchscreen as an option.

It's not something for everyone, but here is my perspective as an artist.

I work in the movie / TV business and storyboard my projects. Basically I draw boards for every shot and then make an animatic in Premiere/Final Cut set to music or a temp dialog recording.

Currently I have to carry around a MacBook Pro AND an iPad Pro.

I plug my MacBook Pro into my monitor, where I run Final Cut and then draw the boards on the iPad. Since this is a creative process you end up going back and forth many times, tweaking the edit and either redrawing boards or creating new ones, as the cut changes.

Working on a separate Mac and iPad is a PIA and really inefficient.

I draw the board on the iPad, then airdrop it to the Mac. On the Mac I have copy it from the AirDrop directory to the NAS where the bin for Final Cut project lives. Data management is a disaster as you are basically working on two separate computers instead of a single system/NAS etc.

Could I cut it on the iPad? Of course, but in my experience jumping back and forth between programs and sharing data on the iPad is a lot more awkward and difficult than on a Mac.

There are other issues like not having access to programs on the iPad like full Photoshop, Poser etc
On a big project I used to run out of storage on the iPad, but since have upgraded to a model with more RAM.

That's aside from the fact that I have to carry both and iPad and MacBook Pro when I do this outside of my office. When I have to go through TSA at the airport I have to keep track of two devices etc. It's a lot of weight, bulky and a serious annoyance. It's also expensive. I had to buy a MacBook Pro AND an iPad Pro for another $1000

At one point I was so aggravated with the whole process that I almost switched to something like a Microsoft Surface or one of the other Windows laptop convertibles. But I can't really do that, because my whole company is based on the Mac and so is the rest of Hollywood.

What I really want is a MacBook Pro with a detachable screen that functions as a tablet/iPad that I can draw on.

That way I can have the main body plugged into a big monitor running Final Cut and I can just draw on the detachable screen like it's an iPad. AND I get to run full Photoshop and have access to all the other software that is not always available on the iPad like Poser.

I can see the logic behind Apple's thinking. The ergonomics of poking at a laptop screen are awkward, as it's tipping over etc. I get it.

But that's the wrong way to look at it.

If the screen is detachable it suddenly becomes two separate devices. Basically it separates into an iPad AND a MacBook Pro. Heck you could even run your favorite iOS drawing program on the detached Mac screen, essentially turning it into an iPad. The screen has a battery pack and can also be powered via USB-C or a MagSafe type connector for long sessions.

With that design you are working in two different modes.

Most of the time you are treating it like a traditional laptop and not poking at the screen. Why would you? You have a trackpad or mouse.

Or you're working the same way as you would with a separate MacBook and iPad, except you have the convenience of them sharing ONE file system and it obviously is a single machine.

When you're done they recombine into one neat little package.
i agree on the workflow basis, it is PIA. I have no problem using Pro Apps on a 13" macbook air. i shouldn't be a problem to do the same on a 13" iPad with M processor and enough RAM. just replace mouse buy Pen. and make MacOS work on iPads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank Carter
Is this the start of unifying MacOS and iPadOS into a single system?

It seems inevitable at this point. The iPad is increasingly being used with keyboards and pointers and now the Mac is gaining a touchscreen. Developing 2 separate OS’s that have such similar use cases just doesn’t make any sense.

And I do wonder if the new Classical app hints at changes afoot given it has no iPad or Mac app. Why develop 2 separate apps if the systems will merge soon. Maybe an upcoming announcement at WWDC?
 
Reading the thread i can see that apples are mixed with oranges.
people disagree a lot because of different usage.
i won't speak about what is best for apple sales, because it is obvious they want to sell you 2 devices.
As a creative using wacom tablets for 20 years and never using a mouse. i give you my input.

A touch based Macbook might be a bad idea unless you can separate the screen and the other half would just be a keyboard.
Best solution is to make an iPad that runs MacOS. and it is obviously possible as all new devices run on same SOC.

IOS sucks for productive work and the software is not there for some. look at Photoshop for ipad. it is way under the desktop model. only good because of pencil functionality.

Let it run MacOS and lot of productive apps will be there without being crippled.

As a creative a keyboard is not really important, The touch keyboard is fine and if you need space make a small keyboard window as you have on iphones. just add option, and command keys. waiting for 2 inputs or 3 if there is a shift after the first.

Regarding device aspect ratio i would like a square iPad. 13 or 14 inch would be ideal. More height is ideal to place a touch keyboard at will. perfect for webpages and you won't need to rotate the device for landscape or portrait stuff.

that's my two cents. Apple get creative again !
 

Attachments

  • 5288066E-A0AB-45A8-BE89-E52BC994F68A.jpeg
    5288066E-A0AB-45A8-BE89-E52BC994F68A.jpeg
    242.4 KB · Views: 59
  • Like
Reactions: Hank Carter
Apple releasing touch screen Macs will be proof that they’ve fully lost the plot and have no clear vision of the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xand&Roby
I have had it on a few Dell's and I usually disable it soon after getting it. I accidentally touch the screen while typing and it moves the cursor. A better option would be to enable pen support on the trackpad. I don't see a need for this unless it is a convertible system, then it works.
 
Looks good. When you combine these rumors we’ve been hearing including the one about a much larger screen iPad, it does make me wonder if they are planning on the move. Could this be a separate product from the iPad?

With the advancements we are seeing in Apple Silicon, I think it is inevitable that at some point we will see an iPad running macOS (though it may not be called an iPad). For simplicity, they could go back to developing iOS for iPhone/iPad and macOS for Mac/iPad Pro, and not have a separate iPadOS. Maybe the iPad Pro gets the option to run iOS or macOS?

I was thinking “macPad” might be a cool name, but it is already in use — Mid-Atlantic Connection for PKU and Allied Disorders 😲
You think what's keeping iPad from running pro apps or more mac like abilities are lack of cpu power? Wrong, it's the lack of courage. Apple doesn't want to cannibalize mac sales.
 
Apple releasing touch screen Macs will be proof that they’ve fully lost the plot and have no clear vision of the future

Or...they are on their way to developing a truly enterprise workstation class OS with touchscreens and not just a bastardization of the two, like Windows is
 
  • Like
Reactions: Manzanito
I do not want a conflated OS, i.e. macOS and iPadOS mushed together. That sounds like a train wreck to me. Rather, I'd like to see an Apple compute product that offers the Apple Silicon equivalent of Bootcamp - a dual boot machine that runs either full-on macOS *or* full-on iPadOS (but not concurrently and, hopefully, with a more "evolved" iPadOS). There was a glimmer of hope when the first AS M processor-equipped Apple laptops were released, as the first M-class CPUs were based on Apple's A-series iPhone and iPad SOCs. Now, we have M-series chips powering both iPad Pros *and* MacBook Pros. Would it be nice to have both OSs run concurrently in separate partitions? Sure. (this would require additional hardware...) Would it be nice if either iPadOS or macOS could be instantiated in a virtual machine running under the "other" OS? (Analagous to running a Win7 64-bit VM under a Fusion or Parallels hypervisor in the days of Intel silicon Macs?) Yes! But, I'd settle for booting up one or the other. I'd have the unadulterated - pure - experience of each in turn.

The inevitable question - "Why?" - will be raised. I travel a lot. Imagine for a moment that instead of taking one or the other of my MBP or iPad Pro, I could throw a single device in the bag.

This machine would look, I imagine, pretty much like an iPad Pro with keyboard/stand attached when macOS was running. Think of it running macOS Ventura (and successors) and, later that day, if need be, running iPadOS 16 (and successors).

I have a 12.9" iPad Pro and it ain't light. I also have an ancient 15" rMBP and it ain't light, either. What would the weight savings be? Hmmm. What would the cost advantage of such a machine be vs. purchasing both an iPad Pro and a MacBook Pro. Again, Hmmm. I don't know the answers to those questions, but there is a lot of expensive parts *duplication* (processor, memory, display panel and supporting electronics, etc, etc.) that would go away in this "integrated" dual boot machine.

I would look carefully at the machine I describe here if Apple were to release it.
 
Reading the thread i can see that apples are mixed with oranges.
people disagree a lot because of different usage.
i won't speak about what is best for apple sales, because it is obvious they want to sell you 2 devices.
As a creative using wacom tablets for 20 years and never using a mouse. i give you my input.

A touch based Macbook might be a bad idea unless you can separate the screen and the other half would just be a keyboard.
Best solution is to make an iPad that runs MacOS. and it is obviously possible as all new devices run on same SOC.

IOS sucks for productive work and the software is not there for some. look at Photoshop for ipad. it is way under the desktop model. only good because of pencil functionality.

Let it run MacOS and lot of productive apps will be there without being crippled.

As a creative a keyboard is not really important, The touch keyboard is fine and if you need space make a small keyboard window as you have on iphones. just add option, and command keys. waiting for 2 inputs or 3 if there is a shift after the first.

Regarding device aspect ratio i would like a square iPad. 13 or 14 inch would be ideal. More height is ideal to place a touch keyboard at will. perfect for webpages and you won't need to rotate the device for landscape or portrait stuff.

that's my two cents. Apple get creative again !
At first I thought the same: make macos run on ipad pros and call it a day.

But maybe apple aims to give you touchscreen on the bigger end models as well. Then you’ll truly need only one device.
 
My office HP laptop has it and unless Apple can make it a million times better, it really is a gimmick that sucks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Serqetry
How about we get iPad running Mac OS instead? Expand the OS continuity seamlessly! ⚠️

View attachment 2171690

View attachment 2171688
I'd buy this immediately.............Get rid of my old MacBook and 1st gen iPad Pro.


I'd have no need to buy two machines again. My tech life would be so much easier...


Apple needs to drop its arbitrary and forced wall between the iPad and MacBooks......... They would move into the current decade.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank Carter
I like the idea of the smaller iPads 10.9 and smaller screens to stay iOS. Then the Pros running MacOS. Win Win for consumers and business's.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.