Many reasons:
- Stock options/grants. ARM employees hold shares of ARM - which is usually how tech companies add additional compensation without using cash. Those shares would have been converted to Nvidia shares.
How do Arm employees own shares of Arm when Arm is owned by Softbank?
Japan's Softbank has agreed to acquire U.K. semiconductor firm ARM Holdings in a deal worth over $32 billion, the companies announced on Monday.
www.cnbc.com
That whole " huge pay day conversion into 'hot bucks to spend' " thing already happened years ago. This would be
Softbank owns Arm. [ Did Softbank give some Arm folks some "Arm funny money' shares. Not sure but that is not normally how acquisitions work. Some relatively very small number of executives could have 'golden parachutes' of 'if arm sold then block grant' clauses, but wide scale , super minority share ownership seems doubtful. ]
Arm holdings disappeared as publically traded stock a long while ago at this point.
At Yahoo Finance, you get free stock quotes, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, international market data, social interaction and mortgage rates that help you manage your financial life.
finance.yahoo.com
- Nvidia employees also get stock grants, which ARM employees are missing out on.
Apple issues stock grants which folks working at Ford miss out on. Whoopy-do. Folks who don't work a company don't get what folks at other companies get.
It is specular sense of entitlement that company employee at company B are entitled to the same equity returns that Company A has.
The boards of Nvidia, SBG , and Arm is a bit misleading. Arm is owned by SBG. So some 'co equal ' board voting thing here is largely a farce. Arm's board is 'rubber stamping' what SBG board says. Arm exists as a somewhat 'independent' entity in part because was one of the terms of deal for acquisition demanded by UK goverment. It also plays into Softbank's play the 'buy'em and flip'em' private equity role they like to play. ( more of an investment guru house than a company that does products/services).
Nvidia is paying Softbank.
NOT Arm. The stock/equity to the Arm employees is also
not to Arm.
Nvidia did a pre-payment cash infusion into Arm. That was the primary upside that Arm got out of this. Hopefully it was structured so that any 'break up fee' largely went to Arm (not Softbank) also. [ to help keep Arm viable as a long term entity/subsidiary until something more stable got worked out. ]
This would semi-explain the ferocity that ARM is going after one of its main customers, Qualcomm.
Actually it doesn't. Can see why Softbank is mad (difn't find a bigger fool to overpay for Arm), but it is Softbank that is largely loosing out getting paid here.
Arm employees would have to be as dumb as a rock not to know that this deal had major regulartory hurdles. The previous 2016 deal to sellout to Softbank ran into
major problems and Softbank wasn't even a substantive customer of Arm. Any Arm employee who was spending that Nvidia stock money in their head before the deal closed is clueless. Buying a lottery ticket would have been more entertaining. That was about the same odds.