The Mac is consistently trending higher sales volume; in the last posted revenue it made $11.51 billion vs. $9.36 billion estimated, up 25.39% year-over-year, and is outpacing the market. Not sure where the desperation comes into this.A whiff of desperation.
Maybe on the cheaper non-retina screens, but I've never seen a retina screen with burn in; my 2008 15" and our two 2014 13" MBPs don't have it and the 13s are in daily use today. The logo is just the screen's backlighting so what exactly is burning in?The illuminated logo eventually caused burn in on the display. Presumably the new patent prevents this.
I’ll be honest, I don’t, always gives you away when you’re working in the dark. Time to go find a sticker to cover it up when I upgrade in a few years.
I hate that I would actually upgrade for this"feature".
My 2009er MBP has it.The 2011 unibody MBPs definitely have it - I think it was even there for later PPC models!
Not quite understanding how that's possible since the logo is a byproduct of the display's back-lighting? I can though confirm that 13 yrs later I've no burn-in of any sort.The illuminated logo eventually caused burn in on the display. Presumably the new patent prevents this.
From the description, it sounds like it would look like the current shiny mirrored Apple when it’s off as it uses its own light source. So, likely a setting to just leave it off all the time.I’ll be honest, I don’t, always gives you away when you’re working in the dark. Time to go find a sticker to cover it up when I upgrade in a few years.
They were also going for “color accuracy” at the time, and having a backwards Apple logo shaped area in the middle that was not 100% brightness controlled meant that any test over that area would fail. I know that mini-LED has a structure layer, but is it opaque? I’m thinking this patent is describing a separate light source that would face outward (instead of depending on a glow from the screen’s light?).I recall reading the reason they dropped it is that the translucent window allowed external light to shine on the back of the display. With the old displays, this wasn't (that) visible on the screen itself, but with the new ones it was. Thus they had to make the entire back opaque. It sounds like the idea here is to add thin layer that acts as a one-way mirror, and have it face outward, so light can go out but not in.
That’s right. But I bet that was SJ idea. The glowing Apple logo just screams his name. And we all kniw that he was the master marketer.To be fair, it was also created under JI.
Yes!! There could be a backlit rainbow Apple logo, like the ones Apple used to put together n their products in the 1990s. Except the ones in the 1990s were not backlit.Now add RGB to the logo and all the gamers will flock
And aren’t there other laptops like Alienware that use glowing logos now? It wouldn’t even be special at this point.I don't like the light-up logo because it's basically trying to draw other peoples' attention to what brand of laptop you're using. How is that anything other than poser fuel?