Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The illuminated logo eventually caused burn in on the display. Presumably the new patent prevents this.
Maybe on the cheaper non-retina screens, but I've never seen a retina screen with burn in; my 2008 15" and our two 2014 13" MBPs don't have it and the 13s are in daily use today. The logo is just the screen's backlighting so what exactly is burning in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pullman
I would really love to see this come back. Maybe give me some control over whether it's on, but otherwise, let's do this. In four years when I upgrade (already have a 14" M1 Max, so no reason to do that right now) I'll be on the lookout for backlit logos for sure.
 
I recall reading the reason they dropped it is that the translucent window allowed external light to shine on the back of the display. With the old displays, this wasn't (that) visible on the screen itself, but with the new ones it was. Thus they had to make the entire back opaque. It sounds like the idea here is to add thin layer that acts as a one-way mirror, and have it face outward, so light can go out but not in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makisupa Policeman
I hope this means they might at the same make the display thicker like it use to be and like other manufacturers are doing it. So we can go notch-less.
 
I’ll be honest, I don’t, always gives you away when you’re working in the dark. Time to go find a sticker to cover it up when I upgrade in a few years.
From the description, it sounds like it would look like the current shiny mirrored Apple when it’s off as it uses its own light source. So, likely a setting to just leave it off all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
I recall reading the reason they dropped it is that the translucent window allowed external light to shine on the back of the display. With the old displays, this wasn't (that) visible on the screen itself, but with the new ones it was. Thus they had to make the entire back opaque. It sounds like the idea here is to add thin layer that acts as a one-way mirror, and have it face outward, so light can go out but not in.
They were also going for “color accuracy” at the time, and having a backwards Apple logo shaped area in the middle that was not 100% brightness controlled meant that any test over that area would fail. I know that mini-LED has a structure layer, but is it opaque? I’m thinking this patent is describing a separate light source that would face outward (instead of depending on a glow from the screen’s light?).
 
I don't like the light-up logo, because it's basically going above-and-beyond to try to draw other peoples' attention to what brand of laptop you're using. How is that anything other than poser fuel?
 
Love, love, love the backlit Apple logo. This is the best rumor I have heard since Apple dropped the butterfly and touchbar. Back to good old days when Apple was designed to be an Apple, not a thin and light PC travel notebook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makisupa Policeman
I don't like the light-up logo because it's basically trying to draw other peoples' attention to what brand of laptop you're using. How is that anything other than poser fuel?
And aren’t there other laptops like Alienware that use glowing logos now? It wouldn’t even be special at this point.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.