Josias said:They're still making fun of the iMac G3 mouse. Let's go make fun of the non excisting pre 1995 windows mice. Mac went away from DOS in 1984. Windows did the same in 1995.
Josh said:Windows 95 was still heavily based on DOS. It wasn't actually until XP that Windows wasn't tied so tightly into DOS. *cringe*
haha and he says he gets thousands of letters and says he'll put them on....and theres only 1?Macmadant said:i notice thats the only story on there, which is probably made up by him
Josias said:They're still making fun of the iMac G3 mouse. Let's go make fun of the non excisting pre 1995 windows mice. Mac went away from DOS in 1984. Windows did the same in 1995.
Josh said:Windows 95 was still heavily based on DOS. It wasn't actually until XP that Windows wasn't tied so tightly into DOS. *cringe*
I think it was Windows NT (even thought NT came after 95? during 95? before 95? I think it was the first one) or 2000, can't remember, XP is a super-set of Windows 2000. - in so to speak terms. I just want to get the facts straight here.Josh said:Windows 95 was still heavily based on DOS. It wasn't actually until XP that Windows wasn't tied so tightly into DOS. *cringe*
i believe you are mostly right, but when you say 'NT,' you mean 'NT 3.0' i'm not totally posisive about that one, so I'll have to check.slooksterPSV said:I think it was Windows NT (even thought NT came after 95? during 95? before 95? I think it was the first one) or 2000, can't remember, XP is a super-set of Windows 2000. - in so to speak terms. I just want to get the facts straight here.
Right cause I think NT 2.0 was based off of Windows 3.11wmmk said:i believe you are mostly right, but when you say 'NT,' you mean 'NT 3.0' i'm not totally posisive about that one, so I'll have to check.
wmmk said:
that just made me laugh. a lot. wow. somebody has too much time to play with photoshop!
Miguey said:haha and he says he gets thousands of letters and says he'll put them on....and theres only 1?
Josias said:I know, it's still kinda loserlike. I never saw a site called windows-sucks. It actually doesn't. Mac is just better
weg said:You mean, like http://www.windows-sucks.com, for example?
Helloooo Automator.lexus said:Lets flood the feedback system and crash the server!
Every one send as many comments as possible!
I hate their ignorance.
wmmk said:
that just made me laugh. a lot. wow. somebody has too much time to play with photoshop!
So.. what's the significance of this? (Be easy, I'm 13 and haven't learned about ports yet)slooksterPSV said:Wow I bet http://www.anti-apple.com/ has some issues:
so far here's the ports I've found that it has open:
21 - ftp
22 - ssh
80 - http (well duh)
81 - hosts2-ns
and I bet it'll find more.
Security risk.Mammoth said:So.. what's the significance of this? (Be easy, I'm 13 and haven't learned about ports yet)
Bill Gates said:Security risk.