Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
I'd second that. When the GPU is idle it draws almost no power.

E.g., right now with this browser open and an external 4k display connected, on my M1-Pro (10 CPU, 16 GPU) power metrics reports:




**** GPU usage ****



GPU active frequency: 13 MHz

GPU active residency: 3.11% (389 MHz: 2.8% 486 MHz: .08% 648 MHz: .03% 778 MHz: .22% 972 MHz: .02% 1296 MHz: 0%)

GPU requested frequency: (389 MHz: 2.7% 486 MHz: .04% 648 MHz: .05% 778 MHz: .20% 972 MHz: .10% 1296 MHz: 0%)

GPU idle residency: 96.89%

GPU Power: 15 mW



On a machine not doing GPU workload, Pro vs. Max will be essentially identical. Because the GPU is essentially virtually turned off, it is consuming so little power.

I'm not sure whether it's the extra gpu cores or the memory speed but there is definitely a difference. It's certainly significant enough to note but it all depends on your use case whether it matters a whole lot or not. If you're going to use the gpu cores often, you should definitely get the extra gpu cores as the difference in battery isn't overly significant.
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724

I'm not sure whether it's the extra gpu cores or the memory speed but there is definitely a difference. It's certainly significant enough to note but it all depends on your use case whether it matters a whole lot or not. If you're going to use the gpu cores often, you should definitely get the extra gpu cores as the difference in battery isn't overly significant.
I'm not sure about the memory *speed* but the fact you have to power 4 memory modules on the M1 Max may make a difference.

There also appears to be a difference between 32GB and 64GB memory on the M1 Max. I think someone posted some power figures here a while ago and the difference in power consumption for notable (64GB being close to double and the about 100 times greater than the inactive GPU cores (c. 1500mW). I'm not 100% sure whether this was a comparison of a 32GB vs 64GB Max or a 32GB Pro and 64GB Max...I'll have a look for the posts...

[Update: it was here: #263

3 - ~800 mW package + 400mW DRAM on a 10c/32c/32GB M1 Max (https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/battery-life-on-m1x-pro-vs-m1x-max.2317578/post-30622884) vs
4 - ~1500 mW package + 750mW DRAM on a 10c/32c/64GB M1 Max (https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...st-idle-load-power-draw.2320968/post-30551266)

The "1500mW" I remembered was the whole package power, not the DRAM, but you can see that in this test, the M1 Max with 64GB used 750mW vs 400mW for the same machine with 32GB. ]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: breath.by.breath

macintoshmac

Suspended
May 13, 2010
6,089
6,994
Tomorrow I can have 14 "max 24gpu 32gb ram 1TB. So what? Should I worry about battery and thermal?

Be scared. Be very, very scared. Some reports exist that suggest these are practically desktops in the guise of portables.
/s


Thermals, no. Nobody reported having cooked an omelette successfully with these.
(truth)
 
  • Like
Reactions: julesme

Pokolasko

macrumors member
Nov 9, 2021
77
36
Be scared. Be very, very scared. Some reports exist that suggest these are practically desktops in the guise of portables.
/s


Thermals, no. Nobody reported having cooked an omelette successfully with these.
(truth)
As I follow this forum, people buy and return the mac as they please. However, in my country, Apple does not even sell products online. The only option is local stores or special configurations that are prepaid and cannot be returned. I like wiener sausage with The omelette.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac

obwohl

macrumors newbie
Dec 1, 2021
11
2
Are there any serious comparisons between the 16 inch pro with 32GB and the Max with 32 GB (either 24 or 32 cores) regarding battery time? If the main reason for battery time is 64gb vs 32gb (or even 64 GB vs 16 GB) i know what I'll order. 16GB pro 16 inch will most likely be the most durable but 16 GB does not seem very future-proof (and degrading the SSD faster of course) - so that's not really an option for me.
 
Last edited:

KirkDayne

macrumors newbie
Nov 12, 2021
16
15
Despite more than a month of lengthy discussions, we still are not able to answer simple questions such as, how much less battery life do you get for choosing a 64GB version over a 32GB version, all other specs being equal...

Of course if you get better performance, you also get less battery, so who wants to know that? We want to know the battery life cost of that added performance when we're not using it.

I wish we could have been more organized to share results of standardized tests with each other, to answer those questions. Some of you helped in that sense but really too few overall, and all we have is anecdotical evidence. I guess I'm too picky and I should just put aside my scientific mind for this one : P

I currently have a maxed-out 14inch and tomorrow I'll receive a M1 Pro 10c/16c/32GB, cause when I ordered I had no idea it could be about the RAM and assumed battery life would be more impacted by GPU cores.

So I'll be able to make some good standardized tests like discussed in previous pages of this thread and draw some good conclusions. Tests will include:
- How much % of battery is drained per hour, while computer fully idle (a.k.a reddit thread test)
- How much % of battery is drained per hour while computer displaying a 1080 video on safari and nothing else

Unfortunately I guess I'll never have the answer regarding if differences will be due to RAM or something else... So I'll just pick my winner from here : )
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Despite more than a month of lengthy discussions, we still are not able to answer simple questions such as, how much less battery life do you get for choosing a 64GB version over a 32GB version, all other specs being equal...

Of course if you get better performance, you also get less battery, so who wants to know that? We want to know the battery life cost of that added performance when we're not using it.

I wish we could have been more organized to share results of standardized tests with each other, to answer those questions. Some of you helped in that sense but really too few overall, and all we have is anecdotical evidence. I guess I'm too picky and I should just put aside my scientific mind for this one : P

I currently have a maxed-out 14inch and tomorrow I'll receive a M1 Pro 10c/16c/32GB, cause when I ordered I had no idea it could be about the RAM and assumed battery life would be more impacted by GPU cores.

So I'll be able to make some good standardized tests like discussed in previous pages of this thread and draw some good conclusions. Tests will include:
- How much % of battery is drained per hour, while computer fully idle (a.k.a reddit thread test)
- How much % of battery is drained per hour while computer displaying a 1080 video on safari and nothing else

Unfortunately I guess I'll never have the answer regarding if differences will be due to RAM or something else... So I'll just pick my winner from here : )
Regarding RAM, you will be able to monitor the DRAM power usage of your 32GB vs 64GB machine to see the difference.

I suspect that under heavy load that uses the RAM but not the GPU cores, that the RAM will have more of an impact on battery life than the increased number of GPU cores.

It will be interesting to see your results.
 

Charlesje

macrumors member
Nov 17, 2016
92
42
@KirkDayne
Good idea! And you’re right, this is also what I was trying to aim at In the discussion a few weeks ago. Please try to to the cinebench cpu test as well while doing the powermetrics to get a richer picture. I have all these numbers for the M1 Max with 32 gb of ram, as you know probably.
 
Last edited:

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
Despite more than a month of lengthy discussions, we still are not able to answer simple questions such as, how much less battery life do you get for choosing a 64GB version over a 32GB version, all other specs being equal...

Of course if you get better performance, you also get less battery, so who wants to know that? We want to know the battery life cost of that added performance when we're not using it.

I wish we could have been more organized to share results of standardized tests with each other, to answer those questions. Some of you helped in that sense but really too few overall, and all we have is anecdotical evidence. I guess I'm too picky and I should just put aside my scientific mind for this one : P

I currently have a maxed-out 14inch and tomorrow I'll receive a M1 Pro 10c/16c/32GB, cause when I ordered I had no idea it could be about the RAM and assumed battery life would be more impacted by GPU cores.

So I'll be able to make some good standardized tests like discussed in previous pages of this thread and draw some good conclusions. Tests will include:
- How much % of battery is drained per hour, while computer fully idle (a.k.a reddit thread test)
- How much % of battery is drained per hour while computer displaying a 1080 video on safari and nothing else

Unfortunately I guess I'll never have the answer regarding if differences will be due to RAM or something else... So I'll just pick my winner from here : )
I'm not sure where you got the idea that the 32gb ram option uses more battery than the 16gb but I haven't seen anything proving that to be true. Battery life is lost when you go for the max.
 

KirkDayne

macrumors newbie
Nov 12, 2021
16
15
@Fomalhaut Yes but what interests me more is to know the impact of that RAM even when using it on light load or even no load at all. Will share the results here.

@Charlesje Sure, I'll do the cinebench test, it'll be for the good of the community cause I'm not sure It will be useful to me. What I am more interested in, more than package power etc, is to see the actual change of % that will result out of some simple tasks / fully idle. Because let's say 64GB displays twice as much power usage with powermetrics (which it appears to be the case if I recall correctly), if it does not translate into way faster battery drain (% wise), then who cares? (that might be due to subtle internal re-balance mechanism that we have no idea about). That's why I'm focusing on the end outcome of % drained per hour.

@Serengeti1 Have you read the thread?
 

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
@Fomalhaut Yes but what interests me more is to know the impact of that RAM even when using it on light load or even no load at all. Will share the results here.

@Charlesje Sure, I'll do the cinebench test, it'll be for the good of the community cause I'm not sure It will be useful to me. What I am more interested in, more than package power etc, is to see the actual change of % that will result out of some simple tasks / fully idle. Because let's say 64GB displays twice as much power usage with powermetrics (which it appears to be the case if I recall correctly), if it does not translate into way faster battery drain (% wise), then who cares? (that might be due to subtle internal re-balance mechanism that we have no idea about). That's why I'm focusing on the end outcome of % drained per hour.

@Serengeti1 Have you read the thread?
I can't remember if I read it all. I've read a lot online and seen a lot of YouTube battery tests... I have never seen a battery test that showed a difference between the 32gb and 16gb m1 Pro models. And I've seen many and have read a lot of stuff online.
 

KirkDayne

macrumors newbie
Nov 12, 2021
16
15
I can't remember if I read it all. I've read a lot online and seen a lot of YouTube battery tests... I have never seen a battery test that showed a difference between the 32gb and 16gb m1 Pro models. And I've seen many and have read a lot of stuff online.
If you had read the thread, you would know where that hypothesis came from. It's pretty solid IMO.
It's not about the quantity of tests but about the quality.
Very few have good quality, and none of then answer the question I am asking here (afaik).
 
  • Like
Reactions: obwohl

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
If you had read the thread, you would know where that hypothesis came from. It's pretty solid IMO.
It's not about the quantity of tests but about the quality.
Very few have good quality, and none of then answer the question I am asking here (afaik).
You only have a theory at the moment. I haven't actually seen it is all I'm saying.
 

obwohl

macrumors newbie
Dec 1, 2021
11
2
If you had read the thread, you would know where that hypothesis came from. It's pretty solid IMO.
It's not about the quantity of tests but about the quality.
Very few have good quality, and none of then answer the question I am asking here (afaik).
Very helpful if you could provide that. All comparisons I've seen are kinda stupid because they mix to many variables (14 vs 16, 16 GB pro vs 32 gb max, etc.) while it would be absolutely necessary to change exactly one variable (for example only RAM or ONLY pro vs max with same RAM). That has not been done yet.
If there were a standardized test procedure or some script which tests your machine automatically (and comparable to other users!) that would be very helpful and we would have our results immediately.
 

breath.by.breath

macrumors newbie
Oct 29, 2021
24
11
As Tested: 10+ Hours of Battery Life on a 14" M1 Max with 24 Core GPU:

I've finally received and tested the battery on my 14" M1 Max 32GB RAM, 24 core GPU, 2TB SSD in a "very light" usage scenario, and the results exceeded my expectations (to put it mildly). The headline here is that you should be able to get 9+ hours of light usage on a similarly spec'd device. Personally, I stopped the battery rundown test at 20%, which I reached after 10 hours and 4 minutes. Read below for details.

For context, I chose to upgrade to the M1 Max for seamless 4K video editing, but I also value longevity in lighter tasks (web browsing, email, productivity, etc), especially in cases where I may have a long flight, or otherwise want to go mobile and unplugged for a few hours. The Verge's review in particular was concerning to me, because it states that the M1 Max should see a hit of several hours of battery life (relative to the lower wattage M1 Pro), and it implies quite bluntly that the GPU cores are to blame for the battery drain. Beyond The Verge, there are other reviews, both written and on YouTube, that similarly suggest a disparity between battery life of the M1 Pro and M1 Max in lighter tasks. To be clear, I am not as focused on battery life when doing 4K editing, as I would most likely be plugged in for longer editing sessions. My question is straightforward and the use case is basic: What is the battery life for very light usage only, and will the M1 Max be able to "sip" the battery slowly when not dealing with demanding tasks?

After reading The Verge review, I decided to purchase a Max build with only 24 cores of GPU (instead of the base 32 cores), hoping to get some battery life savings, especially since I didn't think I'd need 32 cores for 4K video editing; I have no plans for gaming, coding, or 3D design on this device.

Test Details

- During the 10 hour test, I primarily used the laptop for web browsing in Safari, remotely controlling a Windows PC in Safari, iMessage chat, and some streaming video (in both YouTube and Apple TV). I spent a minimal amount of time using Office Applications (Word and Excel). I only had Zoom on for a few minutes out of the entire test, so it was not likely a factor. Partway through the test, I downloaded and installed a Safari ad blocker to prevent excessive autoplay ads (on some websites) from draining the battery; I already use a blocker on my Apple mobile devices.

- Brightness level was typically between 6-7 clicks (8 clicks is 50%). My setting of 6-7 may seem low to many people, and I recognize it's not always feasible to keep brightness below 50%. However, the point of this test was to emulate what I would do away from plug in for long stretches, i.e., on an airplane. In these cases, I'm willing to lower brightness if I can get away with it in the workflow.

- For several hours (I think ~3-4), I had an external 4K 60Hz 27" monitor plugged in and set to mirroring. At some point with the monitor plugged in, I lowered the brightness to 5 clicks since I was only using the 27" display.

- When streaming video through YouTube or Apple TV (a total of around 2 hours), I mostly played audio through my bluetooth headphones, and only minimally through the laptop speakers. The video streaming included around 1 hour and 40 minutes of a 4K HDR movie through the Apple TV app, which looked incredible, even with brightness at half or just below half.

- I had a Bluetooth trackpad and magic keyboard connected during the vast majority of the test.

- Wifi and bluetooth were turned on, "low power mode" was turned off, and "optimize video streaming while on battery" was turned off. Promotion was turned on.

- The laptop was put to sleep overnight and lost 4% in around 8-9 hours of being asleep.

- Room temperature was around 72 degrees and the laptop was used indoors.

- I did not notice the fans at all during the test. The laptop was either cool or only slightly warm.


Battery Rundown (The time elapsed indicates duration of screen-on usage when I reached the percent of battery remaining listed below:

89% - 2 hours (the second hour was plugged in to a 27" monitor with brightness at only 5 clicks for most of that hour).

80% - 3 hours, 18 mins

75% - 4 hours, 0 mins

70% - 4 hours, 46 mins

65% - 5 hours, 32 mins

60% - 6 hours, 13 mins

(At 60%, the laptop was put to sleep for the night; I resumed usage and restarted the "elapsed" time around 8.5 hours later; the battery had lost 4% in the interim)

56% - 6 hours, 13 mins (next morning)

(50% occurred at roughly 6 hours and 45 minutes, but I did not notate precisely at 50%)

47% - 7 hours, 6 mins

40% - 7 hours, 45 mins

(During the prior hour, from 50% to 40%, I did more browsing on media/video heavy sites like ESPN & Yahoo Finance, and I think that may have contributed to a slightly faster drain)

37% - 8 hours, 4 mins

30% - 8 hours, 51 mins

25% - 9 hours, 25 mins

20% - 10 hours, 4 mins

(test ended)

Conclusion

I believe that users should be able to easily reach 9+ hours of light usage on a 14" with the M1 Max, assuming similar specs to mine (i.e., only 32GB of RAM). This also assumes moderate brightness, i.e., 50% or lower.

My own goal was to easily hit 8 hours on light tasks, which would be an improvement from my old 2019 13" Intel MBP. Obviously, the results exceeded my expectations.
Thank you very much for this test. Much appreciated. The only difference to mine is I have 32 GPU and 64 GB Ram. I read that especially the 32 vs 64 RAM is making a negative difference for battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: julesme

breath.by.breath

macrumors newbie
Oct 29, 2021
24
11
For what it's worth, I chat every few days with an Apple sales rep, as they get new talking points, which they check before they answer.

One month ago, the answer to our initial question was: between 3-8% less battery because of additional GPUs and RAM (minimum vs. maximum spec for 14").

Yesterday, the answer was very surprising. The Apple rep said that MAX will be *better* at battery because for light use because it's never reaching any significant CPU, GPU or RAM load, therefore stressing the battery less. I told him there was no test pointing to that online, but he was adamant that this is true.
 

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
For what it's worth, I chat every few days with an Apple sales rep, as they get new talking points, which they check before they answer.

One month ago, the answer to our initial question was: between 3-8% less battery because of additional GPUs and RAM (minimum vs. maximum spec for 14").

Yesterday, the answer was very surprising. The Apple rep said that MAX will be *better* at battery because for light use because it's never reaching any significant CPU, GPU or RAM load, therefore stressing the battery less. I told him there was no test pointing to that online, but he was adamant that this is true.
lol. I'm starting to feel like it'll be months before we have a clear answer at this point...
 

hmorneau

macrumors regular
Jan 4, 2016
201
133
Yesterday, the answer was very surprising. The Apple rep said that MAX will be *better* at battery because for light use because it's never reaching any significant CPU, GPU or RAM load, therefore stressing the battery less. I told him there was no test pointing to that online, but he was adamant that this is true.
That would not surprise me much. My conclusion was that there is no difference between the Max and Pro under the same load. That's why I decided to get the Max. I was like, even if there is a difference it's not significant and well within any margin of error (hence why there is nothing conclusive yet).

But if Apple is smart about it, they should wait after Jan 8 before telling everyone that the Max has better battery life...
 

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
That would not surprise me much. My conclusion was that there is no difference between the Max and Pro under the same load. That's why I decided to get the Max. I was like, even if there is a difference it's not significant and well within any margin of error (hence why there is nothing conclusive yet).
There's been a lot of people with both models suggesting a 1-2 hour difference. Even not performing gpu intensive tasks. There was one video that suggested when doing cpu consuming stuff, there was no difference (without that video I'm not sure we'd be debating it like this). But only one. And there have been others who have compared them with just light usage stuff. Just not many that were fair tests. But the few fair tests I've seen have shown about a 1-2 hour difference. I'd be surprised if it was just within margin of error. I don't know why there aren't more battery tests on YouTube. Maybe cause they take so long to ship
 

hmorneau

macrumors regular
Jan 4, 2016
201
133
There's been a lot of people with both models suggesting a 1-2 hour difference. Even not performing gpu intensive tasks. There was one video that suggested when doing cpu consuming stuff, there was no difference (without that video I'm not sure we'd be debating it like this). But only one. And there have been others who have compared them with just light usage stuff. Just not many that were fair tests. But the few fair tests I've seen have shown about a 1-2 hour difference. I'd be surprised if it was just within margin of error. I don't know why there aren't more battery tests on YouTube. Maybe cause they take so long to ship
There is a lot of people saying a lot of crap too, as long as they get the clicks.

A lot of those YouTubers are clearly clueless about what they are doing. It's a bit like giving a kid a 250HP and a 500HP car and asking him to compare the fuel economy. You will get all sorts of wonky results.
 
Last edited:

KirkDayne

macrumors newbie
Nov 12, 2021
16
15
@Fomalhaut
@Charlesje
@breath.by.breath
@obwohl
@hmorneau

Alright so as promised, I received the new mac and was able to make the tests I always wanted to do.

So first, which computers I am comparing?
1 - 14 inch, M1 Max 10c/32c/64GB -> referred bellow to as "Max64"
2 - 14 inch, M1 Pro 10c/16c/32GB -> referred bellow to as "Pro32"

First test "the idle battery drain test", aka reddit thread test
Methodology: please read the reddit post linked in earlier pages, I used the same.

I had already done the test once with Max64, and result was about 12/13% drained per hour.
This time, same test with Pro32 gave.... I guess similar results. I say "guess" cause I wish I did it with the same precision as Max64 but I forgot to note the percentage two times in a row, after what it weirdly seemed to have been drawn more than Max64, but it doesn't make sense.
In other words, I think it didn't have any impact, but I will retest that tomorrow just to be sure.

Second test "1080p youtube video playing in safari"
Methodology:
- disabled ability of screen to change brightness automatically
- nothing else besides safari is launched
- both computer are set to the exact same brightness level
- both play the same video
- 1080p video
- both computer charged to 100% before starting the test
- videos were set full screen

Limitations:
- At the very end I have had the doubt regarding if brightness was actually the same or not, because I figured out brightness change automatically when you plug-in the charger (it adds brightness), and when you unplug it (it lowers brightness). I know I had put the same amount of tick manually, but maybe that messed things up cause I dont remember if I controlled at beginning of the test. I guess it was same tho.
- I am unsure that both videos were to "1080p" maybe one of them was on "1080p (auto)" which means it theoretically could have changed during playback. I should have picked it manually for both.
- I forgot about ADs... Youtube launches ads that make video play unsynced, so conditions were not perfectly identical
- I messed up the time, I started at 36 min, and then for some reason I switched to 16min.

For those reasons I have made a third test where I controlled for all of these. But for now, here are the results.

Results:

Hour | Pro32 | Max64 | Difference
=======================
20h36 | 100% | 100% | 0%
21h36 | 96% | 94% | -2%
22h36 | 88% | 84% | -4%
23h18 | 81% | 77% | -4% (!warning: not one hour)
00h18 | 72% | 67% | -5% (!warning: one hour from last one, but only 1% diff increase)

Conclusion: I am not confident in this test and I decided to make another one with no flaws.

Third test "Two 1080p youtube videos playing simultaneously on different tabs, on Chrome"

Methodology:
- Browser is Chrome this time, not safari, because why not? Also I never use Safari as a developper so it better matches my use case
- Two videos playing at the same time on different tabs
- Audio disabled on video, computer audio disabled
- First video is playing full screen and other in the background
- Video playing fullscreen was a countdown timer so not very demanding in pixel color
- Both are set manually to 1080p
- Brightness have been double-checked to be exactly the same: 10 ticks.
- Start battery percentage was 66%, I wanted to try not starting from 100% and thats the first number I could manage to sync both machines on.
- I installed an ad blocker.

Limitations:
- I don't see any, tho I forgot to take note once at 18h00.

Results:

Hour | Pro32 | Max64 | Difference
=======================
12h00 | 66% | 66% | 0%
13h00 | 61% | 59% | -2%
14h00 | 55% | 53% | -2%
15h00 | 49% | 46% | -3%
16h00 | 43% | 39% | -4%
17h00 | 36% | 32% | -4%
18h00 |
19h00 | 24% | 19% | -5%
20h00 | 18% | 12% | -6%
21h00 | 13% | 6% | -7%

Conclusion:
I secretly hoped the Max64 to display the exact same battery performance, especially because the task was really easy for both computers.
Unfortunately, we can see that the Max64 has worse battery, even when not using its extra horse power.
We can note that battery drain speed seem to slightly increase the more we approach 0% left.
In the end, with that particular test, which is no near real use case where you could have many software opened at the same time, many tabs, virtual machines, etc, Pro32 seems to have at the very least 1 hour more battery.
In real world use, how much will that be? Not really sure, but its hard to do lighter use than this test, so I'd say at the VERY least, you loose 1h30 of battery life when you go for the Max64 compared to Pro32.
Maybe that difference can increase the more you push on it (with non-gpu tasks). EDIT: since I started at 66%, differences could have been broader if started from 100% and so it may be safe to assume around 2h difference.

What do you guys think?

Please tell me if you want me to test anything else on them while I'm at it. I'll do it tomorrow at most, after that I'll pick a winner and stop doing tests :)
 
Last edited:

Serengeti1

macrumors newbie
Nov 23, 2021
24
1
@Fomalhaut
@Charlesje
@breath.by.breath
@obwohl
@hmorneau

Alright so as promised, I received the new mac and was able to make the tests I always wanted to do.

So first, which computers I am comparing?
1 - 14 inch, M1 Max 10c/32c/64GB -> referred bellow to as "Max64"
2 - 14 inch, M1 Pro 10c/16c/32GB -> referred bellow to as "Pro32"

First test "the idle battery drain test", aka reddit thread test
Methodology: please read the reddit post linked in earlier pages, I used the same.

I had already done the test once with Max64, and result was about 12/13% drained per hour.
This time, same test with Pro32 gave.... I guess similar results. I say "guess" cause I wish I did it with the same precision as Max64 but I forgot to note the percentage two times in a row, after what it weirdly seemed to have been drawn more than Max64, but it doesn't make sense.
In other words, I think it didn't have any impact, but I will retest that tomorrow just to be sure.

Second test "1080p youtube video playing in safari"
Methodology:
- disabled ability of screen to change brightness automatically
- nothing else besides safari is launched
- both computer are set to the exact same brightness level
- both play the same video
- 1080p video
- both computer charged to 100% before starting the test
- videos were set full screen

Limitations:
- At the very end I have had the doubt regarding if brightness was actually the same or not, because I figured out brightness change automatically when you plug-in the charger (it adds brightness), and when you unplug it (it lowers brightness). I know I had put the same amount of tick manually, but maybe that messed things up cause I dont remember if I controlled at beginning of the test. I guess it was same tho.
- I am unsure that both videos were to "1080p" maybe one of them was on "1080p (auto)" which means it theoretically could have changed during playback. I should have picked it manually for both.
- I forgot about ADs... Youtube launches ads that make video play unsynced, so conditions were not perfectly identical
- I messed up the time, I started at 36 min, and then for some reason I switched to 16min.

For those reasons I have made a third test where I controlled for all of these. But for now, here are the results.

Results:

Hour | Pro32 | Max64 | Difference
=======================
20h36 | 100% | 100% | 0%
21h36 | 96% | 94% | -2%
22h36 | 88% | 84% | -4%
23h18 | 81% | 77% | -4% (!warning: not one hour)
00h18 | 72% | 67% | -5% (!warning: one hour from last one, but only 1% diff increase)

Conclusion: I am not confident in this test and I decided to make another one with no flaws.

Third test "Two 1080p youtube videos playing simultaneously on different tabs, on Chrome"

Methodology:
- Browser is Chrome this time, not safari, because why not? Also I never use Safari as a developper so it better matches my use case
- Two videos playing at the same time on different tabs
- Audio disabled on video, computer audio disabled
- First video is playing full screen and other in the background
- Video playing fullscreen was a countdown timer so not very demanding in pixel color
- Both are set manually to 1080p
- Brightness have been double-checked to be exactly the same: 10 ticks.
- Start battery percentage was 66%, I wanted to try not starting from 100% and thats the first number I could manage to sync both machines on.
- I installed an ad blocker.

Limitations:
- I don't see any, tho I forgot to take note once at 18h00.

Results:

Hour | Pro32 | Max64 | Difference
=======================
12h00 | 66% | 66% | 0%
13h00 | 61% | 59% | -2%
14h00 | 55% | 53% | -2%
15h00 | 49% | 46% | -3%
16h00 | 43% | 39% | -4%
17h00 | 36% | 32% | -4%
18h00 |
19h00 | 24% | 19% | -5%
20h00 | 18% | 12% | -6%
21h00 | 13% | 6% | -7%

Conclusion:
I secretly hoped the Max64 to display the exact same battery performance, especially because the task was really easy for both computers.
Unfortunately, we can see that the Max64 has worse battery, even when not using its extra horse power.
We can note that battery drain speed seem to slightly increase the more we approach 0% left.
In the end, with that particular test, which is no near real use case where you could have many software opened at the same time, many tabs, virtual machines, etc, Pro32 seems to have at the very least 1 hour more battery.
In real world use, how much will that be? Not really sure, but its hard to do lighter use than this test, so I'd say at the VERY least, you loose 1h30 of battery life when you go for the Max64 compared to Pro32.
Maybe that difference can increase the more you push on it (with non-gpu tasks).

What do you guys think?

Please tell me if you want me to test anything else on them while I'm at it. I'll do it tomorrow at most, after that I'll pick a winner and stop doing tests :)
Thank you for being so thorough. Hopefully we can put to rest whether there is some kind of difference or not on this forum now. Really makes me curious on the pro 32gb pro vs 16gb pro though... As well as the 32gb Pro vs 32gb max with 24gpu
 

ChpStcks

macrumors regular
Nov 13, 2021
104
31
@Fomalhaut
@Charlesje
@breath.by.breath
@obwohl
@hmorneau

Alright so as promised, I received the new mac and was able to make the tests I always wanted to do.

So first, which computers I am comparing?
1 - 14 inch, M1 Max 10c/32c/64GB -> referred bellow to as "Max64"
2 - 14 inch, M1 Pro 10c/16c/32GB -> referred bellow to as "Pro32"

First test "the idle battery drain test", aka reddit thread test
Methodology: please read the reddit post linked in earlier pages, I used the same.

I had already done the test once with Max64, and result was about 12/13% drained per hour.
This time, same test with Pro32 gave.... I guess similar results. I say "guess" cause I wish I did it with the same precision as Max64 but I forgot to note the percentage two times in a row, after what it weirdly seemed to have been drawn more than Max64, but it doesn't make sense.
In other words, I think it didn't have any impact, but I will retest that tomorrow just to be sure.

Second test "1080p youtube video playing in safari"
Methodology:
- disabled ability of screen to change brightness automatically
- nothing else besides safari is launched
- both computer are set to the exact same brightness level
- both play the same video
- 1080p video
- both computer charged to 100% before starting the test
- videos were set full screen

Limitations:
- At the very end I have had the doubt regarding if brightness was actually the same or not, because I figured out brightness change automatically when you plug-in the charger (it adds brightness), and when you unplug it (it lowers brightness). I know I had put the same amount of tick manually, but maybe that messed things up cause I dont remember if I controlled at beginning of the test. I guess it was same tho.
- I am unsure that both videos were to "1080p" maybe one of them was on "1080p (auto)" which means it theoretically could have changed during playback. I should have picked it manually for both.
- I forgot about ADs... Youtube launches ads that make video play unsynced, so conditions were not perfectly identical
- I messed up the time, I started at 36 min, and then for some reason I switched to 16min.

For those reasons I have made a third test where I controlled for all of these. But for now, here are the results.

Results:

Hour | Pro32 | Max64 | Difference
=======================
20h36 | 100% | 100% | 0%
21h36 | 96% | 94% | -2%
22h36 | 88% | 84% | -4%
23h18 | 81% | 77% | -4% (!warning: not one hour)
00h18 | 72% | 67% | -5% (!warning: one hour from last one, but only 1% diff increase)

Conclusion: I am not confident in this test and I decided to make another one with no flaws.

Third test "Two 1080p youtube videos playing simultaneously on different tabs, on Chrome"

Methodology:
- Browser is Chrome this time, not safari, because why not? Also I never use Safari as a developper so it better matches my use case
- Two videos playing at the same time on different tabs
- Audio disabled on video, computer audio disabled
- First video is playing full screen and other in the background
- Video playing fullscreen was a countdown timer so not very demanding in pixel color
- Both are set manually to 1080p
- Brightness have been double-checked to be exactly the same: 10 ticks.
- Start battery percentage was 66%, I wanted to try not starting from 100% and thats the first number I could manage to sync both machines on.
- I installed an ad blocker.

Limitations:
- I don't see any, tho I forgot to take note once at 18h00.

Results:

Hour | Pro32 | Max64 | Difference
=======================
12h00 | 66% | 66% | 0%
13h00 | 61% | 59% | -2%
14h00 | 55% | 53% | -2%
15h00 | 49% | 46% | -3%
16h00 | 43% | 39% | -4%
17h00 | 36% | 32% | -4%
18h00 |
19h00 | 24% | 19% | -5%
20h00 | 18% | 12% | -6%
21h00 | 13% | 6% | -7%

Conclusion:
I secretly hoped the Max64 to display the exact same battery performance, especially because the task was really easy for both computers.
Unfortunately, we can see that the Max64 has worse battery, even when not using its extra horse power.
We can note that battery drain speed seem to slightly increase the more we approach 0% left.
In the end, with that particular test, which is no near real use case where you could have many software opened at the same time, many tabs, virtual machines, etc, Pro32 seems to have at the very least 1 hour more battery.
In real world use, how much will that be? Not really sure, but its hard to do lighter use than this test, so I'd say at the VERY least, you loose 1h30 of battery life when you go for the Max64 compared to Pro32.
Maybe that difference can increase the more you push on it (with non-gpu tasks).

What do you guys think?

Please tell me if you want me to test anything else on them while I'm at it. I'll do it tomorrow at most, after that I'll pick a winner and stop doing tests :)

Thanks for testing!!! Though I don't agree with starting the third test at 66%, but I understand why it was done and based on the results / differences until the end it appears the max definitely uses more power regardless of that little nitpick.

One test that I'm really curious about and haven't see any to date is how the MAX64 battery lasts on low power mode vs PRO32 on regular battery mode... because if you can get similar or better battery life on low power I would say personally the MAX64 is justifiable, because if you ever need that extra ooof in performance you'd either plug it in or turn off low power mode and accept the additional power consumption...

my understanding for light daily tasks (browser, vdi, music, word processing etc [non GPU intensive, photo/video editing) the MAX on low power is pretty much same or similar to the PRO (on regular battery) in regards to performance.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.