Yeah, I do have a weird feeling about Dell and HP.. never really liked them. I'm more tending towards the ACD 30" or the NEC monitor. Yes, the Apple screen is old (last silent update 2007), but does that make it 'bad'? (I mean even the NEC monitor is from 2008 isn't it?) How do the two screens compare in terms of image quality etc?
What's the PA series? It'll probably be a lot more expensive than the current 30" NEC, no?
yeah the PA is the new flagship one replacing the 90 series in a sense that its going to be nicer ?
just 24 and 27 inch out and will be close to the same price ? so its not a jump up really its more replacing as it goes up ?
think buying a new mac 3 years ago for 3k and spending 3k this year ?
same price just newer technology gets you more
I have a ACD 30 and the older HP that is nicer than the 30 ACD to my eyes in some ways more on that in a sec ? I also have NEC SV 90 series and waiting on the PA 30 to replace the 90 series and the monitors move on down the line I always have one color accurate at least and then a move down of some kind for 2nd display
our layout machine has twin 30s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
the apple and the HP I use the Necs for the color work though waiting for the PA to replace my SV 90 series which will then become my 2nd monitor and the old apple I have as my second now ? might go to the kids room you ge the idea
I replace my monitors every 3 years meaning I buy one every year and move it down the line
when I got the apple it was the only 30 inch game the HP was the first 30 that was wider gamut that profiled well ? its not perfect but better than the Dell profiled out I would choose the one earlier model dell over the apple maybe ? I have not played with the latest 30 inch dell so cant say but reviews are not hot ?
I have always had something like the SV 2490 as its considered the most accurate display out so as 30s have gotten better I always had a color accurate monitor back to sony artisan CRT days
the apple ACD 30 is old and outdated in the sense that things are going wider gamut and printing can show it now with good printers etc...
and yes the NEC is a few years dated but still was so ahead of the game its still good but the PA is going to beat it !! when it comes out as the new technology has a few things up its sleeve !
so while its older its not outdated as bad as the apple is !!
its like the apple is a mac pro 1,1 and the NEC is a mac pro 4,1
the 4,1 will still be beating some new 5,1 configurations
but I doubt any 1,1are going to touch even the lowest 5,1s ?
does that make sense
the apple puts out good color but not as good as NEC ? the apple puts out good color compared to the HP but its not wide gamut ? so its a tradeoff really in some ways the Apple might be a touch more accurate and have a touch less cast than the HP for accuracy I might lean toward the apple if I only worked in sRGB MAYBE ? its that close
looking into the details of shadows and such the apple is lacking over the HP monitor a bit and both fall way behind the NEC stuff by a decent margin to my well trained eyes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
heheheh
so the apple is not bad ? is the mac pro 1,1 bad ? nope its a great machine and from the glance looks the same as the new one ? but will it perform any where near a new one ? NOPE
that is more what I mean
and I am a monitor snob but its my living accurate color ? so I tend to be more picky
also NEC makes great stuff and OK stuff and Dell has a few nice monitors as does HP you just have to be careful in choosing but the NEC the PA or 90 series SV are all top notch and in a league up
so just cause its NEC does not mean its going to be better than anything
IMHO if you are going to spend the coin just spring for the NEC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
and get the SV software ! and either the gretag unit if you can get a good buy on the SV model of the 30 its worth it
again its like buying a Porsche for $60 k and not sprining for the S for $70k
if you went that far might as well do it proper
comparing SV to say color eyes which is good the SV is nicer !
if the super accurate color accuracy is not a big deal ? then the Dell or HP might be the best for you or others that want that 30 and still have good color some might not see the difference ?
another thing I have said for others is get yourself something like the PA 24 inch NEC most say the most accurate monitor out now !!!!
and get a 30 inch dell or HP for a good deal and you end up with about the same as a NEC 30 inch ? maybe a touch more but you have a 30 inch and a super color accurate monitor for color critical work and 2 monitors
this is a great way to go really when you think of it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
best of both worlds ?
but if you need and want that 30 inch to be dead accurate then the NEC is the only game in town
Eizo are nice but overpriced IMHO for what you get ? they cant show and nobody can show they are BETTER than NEC yet cost way more ?
and NEC are not better than the EIZO both are the top ones but when one is half the cost ? its easy for most to choose and not get hung up on the name
hope this helps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"