Everyone here who properly commented on the issues had more thought, and intelligence than my cousin. You have given me more conversational value than he did. Everyone here seems to prefer the ipad pro to the surface--which honestly surprises me, but this is an apple site preferences are obviously skewed as political opinions would be in Texas or New York-- but you at least acknowledged the features, or tried them out on the surface so there's no use in arguing.
While writing my previous post I discovered what I was really looking for: an honest conversation from a techie and his thoughts on competing products. What I got was an antiquated Apple fanboy response, no real detail as to why he has his preferences, and no acknowledgement of what other products brought to the table, and total worship at the altar of Apple--which is a mindset thats dated as hell. I expect everyone here to have favorable opinions and preferences towards apple products, but with reason and sacrificing paychecks at the altar of Apple.
It would have been like:
- asking a chevy gear head about the new Ford GT and getting a response like "Psssht, Found Off Road Destroyed. The Corvette is faster. A yellow one looks like bumblebee" as opposed to a detailed response.
- Asking a sports writer about the Golden State Warriors and Steph Curry's monster year and getting a response like "Basketball is for actors, football and hockey are real man's games. I enjoy watching them and drinking beer".
- Asking a film critic and comic fan about Batman v Superman (a great topic worth discussing), and moving on about how great the marvel cinematic universe is and what a wonderful human being Robert Downey Jr. is.
This topic was initially better received on the Sega forums.
http://forums.sega.com/showthread.php?534030-Blasphemous-statements-made-by-family-on-Easter
[doublepost=1459258376][/doublepost]
On the Surface design -
I also own a Surface Pro 3. It's a very neat device and the design elements work well within the surface design, but they wouldn't work at all within the established iPad design.
The Surface design works well for what it is - a hybrid device. The iPad is not a hybrid device.
It really comes down to what you want and use it for. For example - I bought the SP3 mainly for drawing - holding it for hours while I draw was super annoying. When I held it for long periods of time, I started to question the design - you start to notice how clumsy it is. When I hold my iPad Pro for long periods of time, I notice how much easier it is, specifically because of the thinner design and rounded corners and edges.
There are a lot of other little things that creep up with the Surface Pro 3 design as well. I give them credit (I'm one of the minority who liked the kickstand on the original surface), the SP3 is a very nice design, but the team at Cuperentino still wins out with the iPad as far as I'm concerned.
Also, just a side... I can't look at the Surface Book without cringing! What were they thinking with that horrid hinge design???
I was specifically referring to the iPad Pro as a hybrid device vs the Surface as a hybrid device. Alas you made you points and I really liked them. You acknowledged what each device had, how you use it, and how you like it or dont like it. Your information and opinion would be very useful to anyone.
The surface book is a mess. Its a great idea on paper, and they did the best they could to implement it, and Im sure version 2 will be more refined. I guess it comes down to mindset. As Panos said: people came to him and said "I like the surface, but I want a surface laptop" so they did what they could. You need to see the detachable screen as a clip board, or something you hand off to someone for a short period of time rather than believing it should work as well and long as a tablet. Plenty of devices have detachable keyboards, but none out there have expandable processing and battery power in the keyboard module.
[doublepost=1459259381][/doublepost]
The Federal Reserve? Are you serious? You still didn't manage to exclude politics, btw, and you're being super dramatic.
By politics I'm referring to people running for office or using bogus stats to prove points to manipulate people against each other, demonize the competition, energize the base, and tell everyone in the middle that they're already on my side but they dont even know it.
That subject about monetary policy was more academic than it was political. The kind of monetary backing a nation uses is of little importance so long as there is backing. Whats important is how much that nation produces such as food, machinery and services.