I bet they offer them for 7 years since the release date of the Mac and then axe them.
Is the Silicon Mac Pro SSD a different one to what our 2019 models use?
Last edited:
I bet they offer them for 7 years since the release date of the Mac and then axe them.
Yes it’s different.Is the Silicon Mac Pro SSD a different one to what our 2019 models use?
Evidently one needs:Apple offers replacements SSDs modules for the Apple sillicon Mac Pro and Mac Studio thru their SelfService repair site available in US and Europe.
I bet they offer them for 7 years since the release date of the Mac and then axe them.
And another choice for a complete set of cables (not sure if they ship outside the US) -Sure, as long as the OS has drivers for the card. As I posted I'm running a Gigabyte RX6800XT.
The 7,1 NcMP has internal plugs to power the cables needed to run the cards. You will also need cables:
2019 Mac Pro Auxiliary Power Cables (for AMD Radeon GPU cards)
Auxiliary power cables for 2019 Mac Pro. For use with Sonnet AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT and 6900 XT graphics cards.www.sonnetstore.com
https://www.apple.com/shop/product/HQY92ZM/A/belkin-aux-power-cable-kit-for-mac-pro
Lou
Does that mean a second mac pro, or perhaps, a Mac running for instance, something like Monterey OS12?
any Apple Sillicon MacDoes that mean a second mac pro, or perhaps, a Mac running for instance, something like Monterey OS12?
You have to flash the firmware onto these NAND modules. Very annoying method something that is from the iOS world but Apple Sillicon has its roots from there.From what one forum member did recently with doing such an upgrade, it seems extremely complicated.
Interesting.You have to flash the firmware onto these NAND modules. Very annoying method something that is from the iOS world but Apple Sillicon has its roots from there.
It’s just how it worked on iOS they brought that same model over to Mac.How ridiculous ... I wonder how many R&D personnel were required to re-inventing that storage wheel - which ended up un-round.
The upside to Apple is low cost no need to buy modules with controllers on them and efficiency because they can integrate the controllers at bleeding edge nodes like N5 or N3E because it’s located in the IO die on Apple’s chips and save a bit on power consumption.
Their controllers are good but in typical Apple fashion they use slower Gen4 drives.and it results in a drive that is slower than "pro" industry standard drives, while retailing for ~4x the price.
and it results in a drive that is slower than "pro" industry standard drives, while retailing for ~4x the price.
this is why nearly nobody ever buys the desktop Macs. Not worth it. Too expensive and the MacBooks Pros are a better buy along with a PC workstation.I'm sure people will be along to explain to us at great length why the Apple way is far superior, pay more for less with proprietary components that are hard to get.
I wonder if the Pros are worthwhile. Why have a Pro when it costs a fortune for RAM and drive capacity? If I buy a Windows desktop, I may buy a 15" Air, which is cheaper, lighter, and even a bigger screen than a 14" Pro.this is why nearly nobody ever buys the desktop Macs. Not worth it. Too expensive and the MacBooks Pros are a better buy along with a PC workstation.
I wonder if the Pros are worthwhile. Why have a Pro when it costs a fortune for RAM and drive capacity?
I don't think so about the RAM. I'm used to Mac OS, but I feel it gets worse and worse. I find Windows consistent. Its more sludgy, but if one uses Office and a few more apps, then one typically lives in the app, not the OS.Well, you can load it out with massive RAM. A normal PC desktop less so.
A PC workstation like Lenovo P10 on the other hand- hard to argue with except Windows interface isn’t as nice as MacOS.
Too many ‘TB’ entries……I don't think so about the RAM. I'm used to Mac OS, but I feel it gets worse and worse. I find Windows consistent. Its more sludgy, but if one uses Office and a few more apps, then one typically lives in the app, not the OS.
Just looked, and to get 128 TB RAM in a Studio, one needs to buy an Ultra. The Max tops out at 96 TB.
DDR 5 ram motherboards of very affordable prices now support 256 GB RAM in some PC motherboards. Some 4 slot machines will take 4 x 48 GB memory cards. A quick look and ASUS 600 and 700 Intel motherboards and an AMD variety are upgradable to 256 GB capability this year with just a bios upgrade. There are a number of such motherboards in Australia which cost under $US200. Confusing to work out what to buy though though with PC motherboards due to the variety.
In Australia a Legion T7 34IRZ8 sells for $4,200, => $US after pre tax would be under $US2,500 and I reckon our Australian Lenovo prices would be higher than the USA.
And is upgradable to 128 TB in RAM. Cost of 4 x 48 TB cards = 128 TB is around $US 600. Whether it would get an upgrade to 256TB, maybe a bios upgrade will also come? But looking at on line Mac reviewers, they indicate that their 128 TB Studios don't go any faster with more RAM. Which is an expensive test in reality!! A Studio M2 Max with 2 TB drive and 96 TB RAM costs $US3,600. But 2GB / 192 TB RAM (the max for Mac now) costs $US6,000. And when will a M4 arrive? In PCs, you can change the CPU, like in the Mac Pro Intels.
- Processor: 14th Generation Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF Processor (E-cores up to 4.40 GHz P-cores up to 5.60 GHz) - 24 Cores 32 Threads 6.0GHz
- Memory : 16 GB DDR5-5600MHz (UDIMM)
- Motherboard: RPL R Z790
- Graphic Card: NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4080 SUPER 16GB GDDR6X
Problem is that I now realise a studio is just a notebook without battery/screen/poor keyboard (that can't even take a coffee spill) and with some more ports and better cooling. One has to make up one's mind about drives and RAM before one buys. Annoying. And costly.
Strange thing is about AI - it may remove the importance of the OS.
Where did you find this information? Or test it yourself?So what your doing is with Apple configuration 2 is flashing whatever SSD firmware is on the Mac connected via USB-C to the newly installed NAND modules of your primary Mac.
The iMac Pro has Apple silicon I did mention the T2 chip in the list I provided.Where did you find this information? Or test it yourself?
I have upgraded both my Mac Pros from 1TB to 4TB, and 2TB to 8TB SSDs. Using an iMac Pro with Apple Configurator.
Apple does not say we have to use Apple Silicon macs, and I didn’t read any description saying it will use the firmware specific of the machine that is used
The iMac Pro doesn't have Apple Silicon but Intel Xeon W series CPU (W-2140B, W-2150B, W-2170B, W-2190B).The iMac Pro has Apple silicon I did mention the T2 chip in the list I provided.
My bad. Yeah any Intel or Apple Sillicon Mac running macOS 12.4 and AC2 2.12 can flash firmware on the NAND modules.The iMac Pro doesn't have Apple Silicon but Intel Xeon W series CPU (W-2140B, W-2150B, W-2170B, W-2190B).
So that means quite old Macs can do the job. Like my MacBook pro which is 2017, and can officially run Ventura 13.6.3?My bad. Yeah any Intel or Apple Sillicon Mac running macOS 12.4 and AC2 2.12 can flash firmware on the NAND modules.
So you can get a 2019 iMac(has no T2) and install the firmware onto a 2019/2023 Mac Pro.
My bad. Yeah any Intel or Apple Sillicon Mac running macOS 12.4 and AC2 2.12 can flash firmware on the NAND modules.
So you can get a 2019 iMac(has no T2) and install the firmware onto a 2019/2023 Mac Pro.
You don’t need a USB-C port. I flashed my 16” MBP 2019 with a QEMU macOS 14 instance running on my Linux desktop via a USB-A 2.0 to USB-C data cable.MacPro5,1 with a USB-C card won't work with Apple Configurator for reviving a Mac or flashing it.
yes it can.So that means quite old Macs can do the job. Like my MacBook pro which is 2017, and can officially run Ventura 13.6.3?