Oooh, what a snarky and clueless reponse.You mean the one component that makes up half the cost of a laptop? You don't say.
Why is it that those who understand the least tend to behave the worst?
Logically, what matters when comparing laptops isn't the absolute cost of the screens, it's their delta.
And according to Dell's retail prices, there's not much delta between a screen nicer than than that on the 13" M2 MBP, and one that's obviously worse. Granted, these don't necessarily reflect BOM differences, but the issue I was discussing wasn't BOM prices, it's the retail cost to the consumer.
So if we reconfigured the Dell with the HD screen, that puts it $200 less than the MBP. But then, to be fair, we'd need to add a modifier for the Dell's lower RAM (16 GB vs. the MBP's 24 GB).
Dell doesn't have a 24 GB RAM option. They only have 32 GB, for an extra $850. At the very least, I think we can say the extra 8 GB of RAM on the MBP is worth $100 or $200.
That puts the Dell either equal to or $100 less in price than the MBP, but now the it's the MBP that has the nicer (much nicer, compared to an HD) screen.
Last edited: