Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i can’t find its utility as a camera button, but I think it would work great for scrolling. For example for apps like instagram and TikTok with the infinite scroll, would be cool to be able to scroll with it and double tapping it to like content. And maybe for messaging apps, it would work great for a shortcut to react to the last message or open the selfie camera, take a pic and send it just taping the camera control.

For the camera app… It’s more steady to tap the shutter button on the screen…
An interesting thought. I just posted a complaint that as a camera button (I forgot to qualify that my complaint related to when the phone was held in in landscape orientation) the button was too far to the left for my comfort. But if Apple was to also allow it to be a scroll button as you suggest, presumably with pretty much everyone having their phone in portrait mode to use the sort of apps you mention, addressing my concern and moving the button would put it far too low down on the iPhone to be useful as a scroll/double-tap button so just maybe Apple has had similar thoughts to you and the current placement is a deliberate compromise between where I would want it as a landscape-oriented camera button and where you would want it as a portrait-oriented scroll button in anticipation of possibly doing what you suggest in future.
 
I just got used to it, I just try not to look at upper corners of screen. At this moment I am not sure what is uglier: my notch on 11 Pro or the “pill” they have in all iPhones since 13. Same with home button, once I got a grip of “swipe” gestures I cannot move back. Although on Samsungs I use virtual buttons instead, swipe feels too slow there.

I had seen Galaxy S24 and honestly, this one looks better. I would be as radical as remove front facing camera altogether and end this selfie idiocracy. Anyway this camera is 3 times worse than the main one

That's the problem. They add ugly "design" and forces it on everyone.
Not me. I'm done with paying for bad design.
 
Yea they got rid of the headphone jack. Does the Pixel have one? The Galaxy S24? There must have been a ‘first car’ to get rid of the tape deck, and then the CD player, but good luck finding a new car with one now. People were up in arms about the iMac not having a floppy drive.
CD quality is an upgrade to tape quality. Bluetooth is not a quality upgrade to a direct wire connection. And if Apple didn't get rid of it, neither would have the competitors.
 
I don't hate having the camera control button on my iPhone 6 Pro, but I'm more comfortable with the "traditional" way of taking photos (like on the iPhone 12, 13, 14, 15). So, I'm mostly not using it at this point. The bigger issue for me is the cases. I don't really want an Apple case (one of the only cases to actually cover the button) and the cases I have have a cutout. The cases aren't as comfortable to use and hold with the cutout on the right side. It's not likely to happen, but it would almost be a feature to have cases that cover the button. I don't use the button and would like a case that doesn't have the cutout so it's covered all around.
 
I think the button is a bit stiff, but I’m starting to think that the people complaining about camera shake as if it’s some feature-breaking issue don’t have their thumb on the bottom of the phone. Like they are literally ‘pressing’ down with their finger, not squeezing the phone from the top and bottom.
No, that’s not it. I always had the same issue with using the volume button to take photos, despite firmly supporting/pressing from the bottom as well. I had expected the camera button to be motivated by solving that problem, but it seems almost worse.

Many reviewers are criticizing this, including Hartley in the current MacRumors Show episode: https://www.macrumors.com/2024/09/27/the-macrumors-show-iphone-16-pro-first-impressions/

The new camera button is weirdly misdesigned in many ways. As Hartley says, the idea is a good one, but the implementation isn’t actually good at any of the things it’s supposed to do.

It’s concerning that Apple‘s internal decision processes lead to such half-baked hardware features being launched. The action button already wasn’t great, with having to long-press it, only supporting assignment of a single function, not having the best placement, and arguably being a downgrade for the silent-switch use case. I wonder if they’re actually doing adequate user testing, or if they have blinders with regard to the results.
 
Last edited:
pulling Google Maps in favour for the then crappy Maps software
This was for a good reason and why you have fully functional Google maps on the iPhone right now. Google was purposely sabotaging the iPhone version of Google maps because they didn’t want people buying iPhones instead of android phones. (the motive is my opinion, but they were sabotaging it) The iPhone version didn’t even give you turn by turn directions at that time. Even though Apple Maps was crappy back then it was still better than Google maps on the iPhone. Google finally gave in and updated the app because of this.
 
I love Apple. I was excited about a shutter button. I have a 16 PM. I really really do not like “camera control” (also how arrogant to not just call it a button- some real “dynamic island” nonsense here).
 
This was for a good reason and why you have fully functional Google maps on the iPhone right now. Google was purposely sabotaging the iPhone version of Google maps because they didn’t want people buying iPhones instead of android phones. (the motive is my opinion, but they were sabotaging it) The iPhone version didn’t even give you turn by turn directions at that time. Even though Apple Maps was crappy back then it was still better than Google maps on the iPhone. Google finally gave in and updated the app because of this.
Not to mention the implications we’d be facing now of there being no privacy-conscious, viable and mature alternative to Google using maps and turn-by-turn functionality to add to their trove of data about us would be devastating today.

I’ve held since around the iOS 10 timeframe that Apple took a lot of flak for what was the right decision at the time. If anything, I’d argue that it was a great example of the Jobsian style to know what people needed before they knew they needed it.
 
I don't find the button hard to press at all and I have Osteoporosis so my hands do hurt, also you hold the phone like a camera and press the camera button like a point and shoot camera, you don't press it with no support from underneath, its designed to make the iPhone like a camera, I guess some people here have never held a point and shoot camera so are maybe not holding it the way I would. Its works fine for me, you mileage may of course may vary.
 
This was for a good reason and why you have fully functional Google maps on the iPhone right now. Google was purposely sabotaging the iPhone version of Google maps because they didn’t want people buying iPhones instead of android phones. (the motive is my opinion, but they were sabotaging it) The iPhone version didn’t even give you turn by turn directions at that time. Even though Apple Maps was crappy back then it was still better than Google maps on the iPhone. Google finally gave in and updated the app because of this.
Was just stating a number of things people were complaining about back then. Looking back at it now it was a good decision, but not many thought so when it was taken. And that Apple made a public apology describes it even better how things were when it happened.

Maybe we'll look back at this camera button a few iOS versions and tweaks down the road and say the same thing...
 
Another thing that makes me really mad is that they still use idiotic 24mm and 26mm equiv focal length for main cameras. I mean IT IS TOO WIDE. I want to take a photo of flower, not surroundings and flower. And I don’t want macro camera for that (which is 10 times worse than the main camera), as well as I won’t fall for their digital zoom AI trickery
You may know this but with regards to the default 24mm focal length in the iPhones 15 and 16 you can have the camera set to the 35mm lossless crop as the default when you open the camera app, so you do have that choice for a more ‘normal’ focal length
 
Before you roll your eyes, know that this is coming from the biggest Apple fan boi. I own almost every single apple product line (except the mac pro) and yes that does include the ultra expensive Apple Vision Pro.

Apple (the Jobs era) used to have a very simple philosophy. They focus on one thing that's it. They build the best products. And part of that is saying 1000 no. They release a product only when it is ready. They add a feature only when a customer will be delighted. Their record is not always 100% perfect, sure there are misses. But you can exactly see how they miscalculated, and know that their original intention is to bring joy to customers.

Fast forward today, Camera Control is none of that. Camera Control does not bring anyone joy. It's marketing gimmick that one would expect from any other tech companies but not Apple. At best, users are different and at worst it's hair pulling level of frustration to use. Let me explain.

First, as gruber correctly pointed out. It's incredibly frustrating that pressing it does not always open the camera app. It depends on the state of the phone. If the phone is not 'activated' - i.e. on the AOD mode. Pressing it in fact does nothing. If you wake the phone - either by touching the screen, or by waiting for the accelerometer to pick up motion, then pressing it opens the camera.

Contrast this to the action button. It will always launch it no matter what.

Second, the position of the button is very compromised for landscape shooting. I have larger hands but even for my index finger, it's not longer enough to be bent all the way above the iPhone frame. What you end up doing is, having the finger lay over the top right portion of the screen. One, that obstructs the screen as a viewfinder of the camera, and two it accidentally touches the screen sometimes.

Third, for almost all the half-press functions, they are vastly inferior to the on screen controls. Take zoom for example, it's physically much slower to go from 1x to 5x. Whereas by using the expanded half circle dial, you can zoom to 25x with even less time. Not to mention that with Camera Control you cannot zoom to small increments, like 2.5x.

So to put things in summary, here's where we landed

Camera ControlAction button
Launches app consistently50/50Always
Shutter controlWorks but sometimes misread as half pressesAlways
Video controlHold to recordHold to record
Zoom controlWorks but slow, coarse control, bad index finger positioningFast with on screen, granular control, perfect thumb positioning
Additional camera controls (exposure, aperture etc)Hard to access, not user friendlyon screen controls are equally hard, most users dont use it

There is in fact, no reason to use the camera control button over the action button. Other than the fact that, by degrading your camera launching experience you reclaim the action button for other uses. Which might be worth it for some users...

So this really begs the question, what is Apple doing? Well my theory is this.

I think camera control was suppose to be used with a hold action to launch. This makes it so that it launches 100% of the time, not 50. It's also suppose to be launched with a half press function that provides unique ability. Exactly what, I dont know. But it could've been, something related to cinematic mode or something. It's slated to launch later this year to control focus, but iPhone cameras have such small aperture that you have very deep depth of field all the time anyway which made no sense. They must have some other uses in mind to justify a whole hardware button built around it.

Likely what happened was, that they caved to the investor pressure of AI features. So (1) they repurposed the hold action to now be 'visual intelligence' and (2) they released this hardware/software early and dumbed down the half press feature.

So here we are, not only is Apple releasing a half complete feature (which I'm ok with) but they've butchered whatever original design concepts they had in the name of AI such that even WHEN those features are eventually complete, the end result will be crippled. In the end we will have an unnecessary hardware button to call upon AI (in additional to Siri - so now 2 AI buttons) coupled with a downgraded experience to launch camera or triggering the shutter (compared to any of the existing methods - action button, slide left on lock, press hold bottom right button)

This is where the shift in Apple’s philosophy since the Jobs era starts to show its cracks. It’s depressing, because the old Apple got right on things that no other companies were able to get right. I guess not even the Apple today.

Yeah, another useless button that I didn't ask for and don't need. Another button that I can accidentally push while picking or handling my phone. If I had an option to completely disable it, I would.

I think it is the iPhone version of the Mac Touchbar.
 
The iPhone is getting way too intuitive to use. A UX is piss-poor when you have to look up how to use a button. And I thought having to look up how to power off the iPhone when I got one with Face ID was bad enough. Clearly not.
The silent/ring button is a great example of that. Push it once and it tells you it’s on ring push it a second time and the screen will show a hint to hold it to go into silent.
 
I think the button is a bit stiff, but I’m starting to think that the people complaining about camera shake as if it’s some feature-breaking issue don’t have their thumb on the bottom of the phone. Like they are literally ‘pressing’ down with their finger, not squeezing the phone from the top and bottom.
Squeezing the phone to take a picture also shakes the phone a bit for me. An easy fix would be for Apple to allow tapping to take pictures.
 
^^^
3D Touch kicked ass
CD quality is an upgrade to tape quality. Bluetooth is not a quality upgrade to a direct wire connection. And if Apple didn't get rid of it, neither would have the competitors.
Bluetooth is a quality of life upgrade over a wired connection. My grandparents first TV remote was connected to the TV by a wire; I honestly think people underestimate just how insane wired headphones will seem as a concept in the quite near future.

If you are an audiophile you weren’t using the headphone jack anyway; you had your own DAC and amp connected; the worst thing was taking the wired headphones out of the box in an attempt to force people to buy AirPods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
You may know this but with regards to the default 24mm focal length in the iPhones 15 and 16 you can have the camera set to the 35mm lossless crop as the default when you open the camera app, so you do have that choice for a more ‘normal’ focal length
Unfortunately it is lossless only on paper, in fact still digital zoom just slightly fancier due to increased sensor size (so it doesn’t look as horrendous as with older iPhones). It is definitely a very welcome improvement but unfortunately not what I dream of:( I have seen the examples of 15 and Pro digital zoom and gotta say I am quite impressed, tho I would really love them to bump the focal length since there is a huge gap between 1.0x and 5.0x. Ultrawide should then instead be somewhat like 18-21mm.

I learned that the first iPhone that introduced somewhat less tragic digital zoom was iPhone 13. On my 11 Pro trying to crop or zoom digital (at least in default camera, RAW is more or less good) will result in truly awful picture.

Back in the days when I had iPhone 5 it was 33 mm which was truly a magical focal length imo, I made some of the best shots in my life with this exact focal length. The iPhone 4 was also nice cause it had 35mm, but back then 5 felt like a huge technological advancement over this one. Later on I could not understand why I cannot take better shots with newer models and only after some time I realized there was a huge framing difference, I mean I framed like with old phones but on newer ones
 
Just put an incompatible case on it, problem solved.

But I agree that it seems like one of those Touch Bar moments that won’t stick around for too long. Remember Touch Bar was developed under Ive’s leadership, who can say what era of Apple was actually 100% perfect.
 
It is an odd addition. Went to try it out today. Usefulness almost zero. Scrolling through the options it brings up on the screen are much quicker and more intuitive on the actual screen - button sluggish, less useful and more narrow in scope when using to scroll.

A solution to a problem that didn’t exist.
 
Before you roll your eyes, know that this is coming from the biggest Apple fan boi. I own almost every single apple product line (except the mac pro) and yes that does include the ultra expensive Apple Vision Pro.

Apple (the Jobs era) used to have a very simple philosophy. They focus on one thing that's it. They build the best products. And part of that is saying 1000 no. They release a product only when it is ready. They add a feature only when a customer will be delighted. Their record is not always 100% perfect, sure there are misses. But you can exactly see how they miscalculated, and know that their original intention is to bring joy to customers.

Fast forward today, Camera Control is none of that. Camera Control does not bring anyone joy. It's marketing gimmick that one would expect from any other tech companies but not Apple. At best, users are different and at worst it's hair pulling level of frustration to use. Let me explain.

First, as gruber correctly pointed out. It's incredibly frustrating that pressing it does not always open the camera app. It depends on the state of the phone. If the phone is not 'activated' - i.e. on the AOD mode. Pressing it in fact does nothing. If you wake the phone - either by touching the screen, or by waiting for the accelerometer to pick up motion, then pressing it opens the camera.

Contrast this to the action button. It will always launch it no matter what.

Second, the position of the button is very compromised for landscape shooting. I have larger hands but even for my index finger, it's not longer enough to be bent all the way above the iPhone frame. What you end up doing is, having the finger lay over the top right portion of the screen. One, that obstructs the screen as a viewfinder of the camera, and two it accidentally touches the screen sometimes.

Third, for almost all the half-press functions, they are vastly inferior to the on screen controls. Take zoom for example, it's physically much slower to go from 1x to 5x. Whereas by using the expanded half circle dial, you can zoom to 25x with even less time. Not to mention that with Camera Control you cannot zoom to small increments, like 2.5x.

So to put things in summary, here's where we landed

Camera ControlAction button
Launches app consistently50/50Always
Shutter controlWorks but sometimes misread as half pressesAlways
Video controlHold to recordHold to record
Zoom controlWorks but slow, coarse control, bad index finger positioningFast with on screen, granular control, perfect thumb positioning
Additional camera controls (exposure, aperture etc)Hard to access, not user friendlyon screen controls are equally hard, most users dont use it

There is in fact, no reason to use the camera control button over the action button. Other than the fact that, by degrading your camera launching experience you reclaim the action button for other uses. Which might be worth it for some users...

So this really begs the question, what is Apple doing? Well my theory is this.

I think camera control was suppose to be used with a hold action to launch. This makes it so that it launches 100% of the time, not 50. It's also suppose to be launched with a half press function that provides unique ability. Exactly what, I dont know. But it could've been, something related to cinematic mode or something. It's slated to launch later this year to control focus, but iPhone cameras have such small aperture that you have very deep depth of field all the time anyway which made no sense. They must have some other uses in mind to justify a whole hardware button built around it.

Likely what happened was, that they caved to the investor pressure of AI features. So (1) they repurposed the hold action to now be 'visual intelligence' and (2) they released this hardware/software early and dumbed down the half press feature.

So here we are, not only is Apple releasing a half complete feature (which I'm ok with) but they've butchered whatever original design concepts they had in the name of AI such that even WHEN those features are eventually complete, the end result will be crippled. In the end we will have an unnecessary hardware button to call upon AI (in additional to Siri - so now 2 AI buttons) coupled with a downgraded experience to launch camera or triggering the shutter (compared to any of the existing methods - action button, slide left on lock, press hold bottom right button)

This is where the shift in Apple’s philosophy since the Jobs era starts to show its cracks. It’s depressing, because the old Apple got right on things that no other companies were able to get right. I guess not even the Apple today.
Sigh. Is this another ChatGPT post or something? So you don't like the camera button. I do. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.