Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bottom line is the new camera control could be much better with software updates. Only time will tell if this design team (you know there is one) has the self awareness to realize how badly they designed it and hopefully they can at least make it useful. Steve would have thrown this thing out a window and the people responsible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iPhone2019
Camera control is the worst thing that happened to the iPhone since the iPhone, or 3D touch, whatever was first.
If your comparing camera co from with 3D Touch in a negative sense 3D Touch was awesome. And although right now I have a 15 I want to go into the store and try the 16 with CC.
iPhone is about uniformity in design and minimal distractions. Another button makes using cases more problematic, as well as it works like some sort of hi-tech toy instead of real feeling as you get on real cameras.
True to a certain extent about the cases.
People asking for less processed photos,
Which people? People want good enough photos OOB. It’s true some vocal minority have been voicing an opinion.
they slap even more processing. People want adequate colors, they bring what they brought with 16. People want to finally get rid of “dynamic island” pill and it stays here for so long.
Which people want to get rid of Dynamic Island? I don’t want it gone and like the added visual value it brings. I didn’t want 3D Touch gone either. But DI is probably here to stay.
In fact, there are hardly any differences between older and newer iPhones in terms of design.
Phones in general in 2024 are slabs of glass and metal. It’s what’s in the inside that counts.
Also the actual cameras and sensors are identical across 14, 15 and 16. Three generations of same shots, no improvements and pure marketing.

Back in the days iPhones also were not as large as nowadays. I mean, I don’t want a pocket iPad mini. All I want is smaller form factor to come back. The smaller the better for photography.

Another thing that makes me really mad is that they still use idiotic 24mm and 26mm equiv focal length for main cameras. I mean IT IS TOO WIDE. I want to take a photo of flower, not surroundings and flower. And I don’t want macro camera for that (which is 10 times worse than the main camera), as well as I won’t fall for their digital zoom AI trickery
You may be a person whereby the camera system doesn’t suit you. Shooting a 50mm is great but maybe the use case for phones is too narrow.
 
Bottom line is the new camera control could be much better with software updates. Only time will tell if this design team (you know there is one) has the self awareness to realize how badly
By whose metric is it designed badly?
they designed it and hopefully they can at least make it useful. Steve would have thrown this thing out a window and the people responsible.
Steve is dead and had his share of gaffs.
 
I went to an Apple Store to try it, and based on some comments, I was ready to be disappointed and frustrated. But I got it right immediately, and position, pressure, etc. seemed perfect to me. Admittedly, I already knew about the gestures and how to make it work, and I think it wouldn’t be easy to intuitively get the half-press. But anyway, I think this button will be mainly useful to those of use who are more into photography - for everyday point-and-shoot photography, I think touchscreen controls are still better.

To me, it‘s probably the best addition to the iPhone since the iPhone X, and I’m pretty sure it will remain a key distinction factor of the iPhone for years.
 
The sarcastic laughing reaction emoji is so overused on this site. There's nothing in the original post that warrants ridicule; it's a well-thought-out analysis of a new feature. Sure, the leap to broader conclusions about Apple's corporate vision might be a stretch, but it's far from laughable. Disagreeing or dismissing the premise is fine, but reacting with "🤣" feels like the laziest response possible.

That said, lol, I'll just laugh at my own post now. Why should I care about laugh emojis, right? Hilarious! Looking forward to the next "who cares, you write too much lol" comment. Lol
 
The good news is using the new camera control button is completely optional. Hardly seems like your personal experience is worthy of such a lengthy complaint about the feature overall.

It’s the biggest new feature of iPhone 16 available today. In most parts of the world, this is the only new notable feature for the foreseeable future. People waited 12 months for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carterv15
I will say this. I stopped by my local Apple Store to check out the phone. I was super frustrated by the camera button. Other than launching the camera app and functioning as a shutter button, it was completely unintuitive to use. A core principal of Apple design, especially with the iPhone, has always been that you learn how to use something just by using it. How to do anything with the button was not apparent. No feedback or indication of what you're adjusting until you adjust it. I needed to lookup how to use it. A disappointing execution, but I am sure they will refine it in software.
I agree, I did the same thing the other day, with the whole line-up. Opened the stock camera app and then touched and swiped Camera Control. I got an exposure slide. That was it, nothing changed after pressing the button. So I have to read a manual, as if it were a Sony, Samsung, or something. Very unintuitive.
 
The good news is using the new camera control button is completely optional.
It can’t be fully disabled I think. The best you can do is to switch it to double-press to prevent accidental activation. In addition, you can’t get any third-party case without a cutout for it. This means you can’t just pretend like it isn’t there.
 
Idk, I find the idea of that button appealing - but I‘ve already seen enough videos of people swiping on the button and the Ui does not react accordingly, or they have to do another swipe - so it reminds me of the swipe gestures on the badly designed apple mouse they still keep around (which reminds me of the time when Craig Federighi demoed Final Cut on stage and the mouse didn‘t respond properly.
 
Before you roll your eyes, know that this is coming from the biggest Apple fan boi. I own almost every single apple product line (except the mac pro) and yes that does include the ultra expensive Apple Vision Pro.

Apple (the Jobs era) used to have a very simple philosophy. They focus on one thing that's it. They build the best products. And part of that is saying 1000 no. They release a product only when it is ready. They add a feature only when a customer will be delighted. Their record is not always 100% perfect, sure there are misses. But you can exactly see how they miscalculated, and know that their original intention is to bring joy to customers.

Fast forward today, Camera Control is none of that. Camera Control does not bring anyone joy. It's marketing gimmick that one would expect from any other tech companies but not Apple. At best, users are different and at worst it's hair pulling level of frustration to use. Let me explain.

First, as gruber correctly pointed out. It's incredibly frustrating that pressing it does not always open the camera app. It depends on the state of the phone. If the phone is not 'activated' - i.e. on the AOD mode. Pressing it in fact does nothing. If you wake the phone - either by touching the screen, or by waiting for the accelerometer to pick up motion, then pressing it opens the camera.

Contrast this to the action button. It will always launch it no matter what.

Second, the position of the button is very compromised for landscape shooting. I have larger hands but even for my index finger, it's not longer enough to be bent all the way above the iPhone frame. What you end up doing is, having the finger lay over the top right portion of the screen. One, that obstructs the screen as a viewfinder of the camera, and two it accidentally touches the screen sometimes.

Third, for almost all the half-press functions, they are vastly inferior to the on screen controls. Take zoom for example, it's physically much slower to go from 1x to 5x. Whereas by using the expanded half circle dial, you can zoom to 25x with even less time. Not to mention that with Camera Control you cannot zoom to small increments, like 2.5x.

So to put things in summary, here's where we landed

Camera ControlAction button
Launches app consistently50/50Always
Shutter controlWorks but sometimes misread as half pressesAlways
Video controlHold to recordHold to record
Zoom controlWorks but slow, coarse control, bad index finger positioningFast with on screen, granular control, perfect thumb positioning
Additional camera controls (exposure, aperture etc)Hard to access, not user friendlyon screen controls are equally hard, most users dont use it

There is in fact, no reason to use the camera control button over the action button. Other than the fact that, by degrading your camera launching experience you reclaim the action button for other uses. Which might be worth it for some users...

So this really begs the question, what is Apple doing? Well my theory is this.

I think camera control was suppose to be used with a hold action to launch. This makes it so that it launches 100% of the time, not 50. It's also suppose to be launched with a half press function that provides unique ability. Exactly what, I dont know. But it could've been, something related to cinematic mode or something. It's slated to launch later this year to control focus, but iPhone cameras have such small aperture that you have very deep depth of field all the time anyway which made no sense. They must have some other uses in mind to justify a whole hardware button built around it.

Likely what happened was, that they caved to the investor pressure of AI features. So (1) they repurposed the hold action to now be 'visual intelligence' and (2) they released this hardware/software early and dumbed down the half press feature.

So here we are, not only is Apple releasing a half complete feature (which I'm ok with) but they've butchered whatever original design concepts they had in the name of AI such that even WHEN those features are eventually complete, the end result will be crippled. In the end we will have an unnecessary hardware button to call upon AI (in additional to Siri - so now 2 AI buttons) coupled with a downgraded experience to launch camera or triggering the shutter (compared to any of the existing methods - action button, slide left on lock, press hold bottom right button)

This is where the shift in Apple’s philosophy since the Jobs era starts to show its cracks. It’s depressing, because the old Apple got right on things that no other companies were able to get right. I guess not even the Apple today.
Wrong. The first upgrades of the iPhone from Job’s era had minimal upgrades too. You either didn’t live through the era or forget. iPhone all the way to 4 only added video and a couple other small things. His final iPhone was the 4S that only added Siri. The iPhone has always only had incremental updates and this latest one had more updates than last year. Nothing has changed, it’s all in your head.
 
...I really really do not like “camera control” (also how arrogant to not just call it a button- some real “dynamic island” nonsense here).

That's because you press a button, but this has other features and controls - to change exposure, zoom, etc., you move your finger or thumb across it to make an adjustment. That's more than just a button.

Of all the cameras I've owned, the most a shutter button does is it has a half press and a full press. But that button on its own doesn't allow for changing exposure, zooming, etc. Apple designed this to have greater functionality than a button, hence the name.

You don't have to like it, but that's pretty clearly why Apple calls it that.
 
Apple has gotten many things wrong even during the Steve Jobs era, but it didn’t lose its way even now. Tim Cook is solely focused on money. And people can say well he didn’t do accessibility features for ROI - but all the health features add up to money.

Going to say it again - this was Steve’s biggest fear - Tim Cook is not a product person! He would be fascinated by anything. He fired his direct threats in the first year.

Apple has some amazing SoCs, but everywhere else the company just focuses on money. It’s greed and it’s bad greed. The better the stock does the more Tim makes in stock grants. His stock always vests, and he and the top 1% get filthy rich off the backs of mistreated workers and people’s hard earned money. Whether it’s the store manager making 1/10,000th Tim’s pay or the factory worker making $10 per day, Apple today proves greed is not good.

Camera Control Button was supposedly such a great feature - internally - shows Tim knows nothing and there’s nobody who can say “this is something that shouldn’t be here!” Nobody can challenge and Tim doesn’t know products.

Even worse than this in my opinion is the big sale of “Apple Intelligence.” Not on the iPhone at launch is unforgivable and there will be lawsuits over it. They should have at least launched it with beta AI. Even when some features come, what will they really be? They promised something at the keynote they cannot deliver on. They’re going to kill the programmers who have to get their empty promises done. I like Marques Brownlee saying “if it doesn’t ship with it, don’t ever count on it.”

My sole focus if I were a board member would be to put a real visionary at the top - not for the sake of the stock price now but for people who like Warren Buffet buy stock for life (who sold the vast majority of Berkshire’s stake in AAPL). The stock will be a shell of itself in 20 years if a product person who’s a visionary isn’t there to say “NO!”

I think not only has Apple lost its way but the USA lost it by allowing these big companies to rule the world. Love the EU stopping the anticompetitive bully that is Apple (and others like it). I would prefer protecting SMBs to the whole billions to companies Apple needs to fabricate in the USA because everyone is worried Taiwan will cease to exist within five years or that China will own the technology. Shocking how big businesses run the government.
 
I get pissed when someone says, EVERYONE hates or wants this or that. Nobody speaks for me.
It's a figure of speech. Most people understand that it does not mean literally every single person on the planet, let alone get all pissed off about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carterv15
It can’t be fully disabled I think. The best you can do is to switch it to double-press to prevent accidental activation. In addition, you can’t get any third-party case without a cutout for it. This means you can’t just pretend like it isn’t there.
FWIW, I have the UAG Monarch Pro Case for my 16PM. I have the same case for my 14PM. The phones fit each other's cases perfectly.

If you put the 14 case on the 16, it will hide that button just fine, and just exposes the "action button" but doesn't interfere with it in any way. It is a perfect solution for the stupid camera control button.
 
The camera control button would be more useful if it can be used for different things other than just the camera.
 
The camera control button would be more useful if it can be used for different things other than just the camera.
You know what would add some utility? If you could use it as a general purpose zoom in and out on the screen controller, instead of the pinch the screen thing.
 
I am also not convinced by the camera button, but it‘s good for quickly launching the camera while having the action button for a quick Shazam. Also, I like that I can now shoot a photo single handed on the Max. But it‘s not a game changer to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr.C
I am also not convinced by the camera button, but it‘s good for quickly launching the camera while having the action button for a quick Shazam. Also, I like that I can now shoot a photo single handed on the Max. But it‘s not a game changer to me.
What is a "quick Shazam" ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.