just fyi - the Nikon D2Xs does high-speed cropping already. Looks like Canon got beat out on introducing that feature! (and both of them got beat out by Sony on the auto sensor cleaner).jared_kipe said:I cannot believe 5fps at 22-24MP. I think they could certainly stick with 16MP. It is still the resolution leader, no reason to make file sizes that much bigger.
That said, 5fps at 16MP is pretty hard to believe too.
High speed crop sounds fun though.
Yeah I know that, the D2X is pretty impressive, and it already has 1.5x crop which I like.carletonmusic said:just fyi - the Nikon D2Xs does high-speed cropping already. Looks like Canon got beat out on introducing that feature! (and both of them got beat out by Sony on the auto sensor cleaner).
Part of me says that $10k is ridiculous and just someone's crazy made up number. But still, people are paying full price for Canon's top body -- if the market allows it, why not charge $10k?
jared_kipe said:Olympus has had auto sensor cleaning (Super Sonic Wave!) since the e-1 and later the e-300. But I think thats a feature I can do without, I've never had a problem with dust on my sensor. On my view-screen yes, but never my sensor.
It wasn't so long ago that we heard people talking that way about 4-8MP imagesbeavo451 said:+1 It is also another opportunity for a gizmo to break around the sensor area.
I can't imagine having to deal with 22MP images though. Files would be huge! Also, they would start to encroach on MF territory and we will see even higher resolution MF backs.
AGoglanian said:God i wish i could have one of those when they come out.
But i am perfectly happy with my 5D and 1DmkII bodies
I do kind of miss my hassy H1 however. i just simply could NOT afford a digital back for it *drools over 39MP digital back*
I'm sure when this new amazing 1D comes out, i will be able to get a 1DsmkII for an amazing deal! WOO!
beavo451 said:...........................
I can't imagine having to deal with 22MP images though. Files would be huge! ......................
iGary said:I don't see this anytime soon.
Mamiyas newest digital back and SLR are 22MP in the digital arena.
I imagine we will see 16-18 before we jump to 22.
Mike Teezie said:I can't wait for this beast to come out. I won't be able to afford it of course, but it's fun to think about.
I'm all for a higher res sensor in the MkIII, so that maybe a larger sensor will trickle into the 5D in the next few months. FF, here I come!
You don't think Gary? We are already at 16.7 in the MkII. Seems like Canon would want to take on MF head on.
beavo451 said:Speaking of great deals. Dell had a typo on their website for a 1Ds MkII and listed it for $4000. They didn't honor the hundreds of orders though.
iGary said:I don't see this anytime soon.
Mamiyas newest digital back and SLR are 22MP in the digital arena.
I imagine we will see 16-18 before we jump to 22.
w_parietti22 said:Is there really a time when 16.7mps is not enough?
I am sometimes in the market for a 20x30 print. 16.7MP is great, but it's only 166ppi - I'd prefer a higher pixel density. And, if you have to crop the image at all, you're losing pixels left and right.w_parietti22 said:Is there really a time when 16.7mps is not enough?
beavo451 said:Speaking of great deals. Dell had a typo on their website for a 1Ds MkII and listed it for $4000. They didn't honor the hundreds of orders though.
carletonmusic said:Given that the MKII is still a relatively new camera, I wonder what will happen to the prices if this new beast is released. For me, the MKII at $4k would be a great buy.
iGary said:I could be wrong, and probably am.
I love your new site, by the way. May I ask if you did it yourself, and if so, where did you learn Flash from (looking for a good book).