Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,521
19,674
I think you just hit the nail on the head about why Apple will not entertain the ideas suggested here about increasing power consumption. Dissipating 600W does not seem like something a company concerned about waste would do.

They built a fairly innovative chassis that can do exactly that. And there are users who need a lot of performance. Apple hardware will still be able to do substantially more work at the same power draw than the other hardware, so you argument hardly applies here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iPadified

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
Too many threads end in Mac Pro speculations at the moment. Apple please stop the pain: release it now or kill it (like the iMac 27 inch) so we can move on to complain about the complete absence of an MP or the absence of GTX cards, cheap RAM and SSD upgrades and of course the price and bean counter Tim.
You're right. It seems like this forum is just rehashing Mac Pro SoC, 8GB or 16GB, and why can't Apple give us 512GB SSD standard.

That's why I try to make threads about different topics that are a bit more interesting.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iPadified

MayaUser

macrumors 68040
Nov 22, 2021
3,177
7,196

Do people really think Apple will use a one-year-old SoC to introduce arguably their most important Mac?
yes, because this time will praise the battery life on this 15" M2 Air
I hope im wrong, maybe this 15" Air that can support M2 Pro depends on the thermals and how thin and light Apple wants this to be
 

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
yes, because this time will praise the battery life on this 15" M2 Air
I hope im wrong, maybe this 15" Air that can support M2 Pro depends on the thermals and how thin and light Apple wants this to be
If you put an M2 Pro in an Air, it'll just throttle to behave like a normal M2, but less efficient.

Maybe multithread performance might gain a tiny bit or GPU performance might gain a tiny bit. It'll quickly get throttled so that the difference won't be worth it.

People need to stop thinking that a fanless design can support the Pro SoC.
 

MayaUser

macrumors 68040
Nov 22, 2021
3,177
7,196
If you put an M2 Pro in an Air, it'll just throttle to behave like a normal M2, but less efficient.

Maybe multithread performance might gain a tiny bit or GPU performance might gain a tiny bit. It'll quickly get throttled so that the difference won't be worth it.

People need to stop thinking that a fanless design can support the Pro SoC.
again, like i said, it depends how light and thick they want to do it...2 fans like the 24" imac and it can be done
We dont know the 15" Air will be fanless...and nobody said that fanless can support Pro SoC, or at least i didnt read something like that
So who are those people who are thinking, or is there a topic about it?

Bottom line is that M3 mostly will not be present at the WWDC
 
Last edited:

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
again, like i said, it depends how light and thick they want to do it...2 fans like the 24" imac and it can be done
We dont know the 15" Air will be fanless...and nobody said that fanless can support Pro SoC, or at least i didnt read something like that
So who are those people who are thinking, or is there a topic about it?
If it isn’t fanless, they won’t call it an Air. They would call it a Pro. There is already a Pro.

The expectation is that it’ll have the same thickness and the same design as the 13” Air but just a larger screen. It’s a formula that works well and sells well. Adding a fan in there is less appealing and makes the base M version worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,247
841
If it isn’t fanless, they won’t call it an Air. They would call it a Pro. There is already a Pro.

The expectation is that it’ll have the same thickness and the same design as the 13” Air but just a larger screen. It’s a formula that works well and sells well. Adding a fan in there is less appealing and makes the base M version worse.
Actually, IIRC, Intel MBA has fan? There are notebook fans that are extremely thin.
 

dmccloud

macrumors 68040
Sep 7, 2009
3,142
1,899
Anchorage, AK
Actually, IIRC, Intel MBA has fan? There are notebook fans that are extremely thin.

Intel Macs had to have fans because they are incapable of making processors that can survive without some form of active cooling solution. Apple Silicon is a different beast entirely. The fanless and completely silent operation of the AS Airs has become a hallmark of that product line.
 

Boil

macrumors 68040
Oct 23, 2018
3,477
3,173
Stargate Command
Could we see M3 before A17...?

N3B wafers, for which Apple is the sole customer right now, have been in mass production since the end of 2022...?

I am hoping for M3 Ultra / M3 Extreme Mac Pros no later than WWDC 2023...!
 

iPadified

macrumors 68020
Apr 25, 2017
2,014
2,257
Could we see M3 before A17...?

N3B wafers, for which Apple is the sole customer right now, have been in mass production since the end of 2022...?

I am hoping for M3 Ultra / M3 Extreme Mac Pros no later than WWDC 2023...!
Although mass production is subjective regarding scale, stockpiling 3-6 months of SoCs suggest a high volume product. I doubt the MP will be that. Even if the studio is included, it seems unlikely unless of course the M3 Ultra have some major features that puts high end AMD/NVIDIA cards to shame. I doubt that even more.

Still hope we get the final piece of the transition revealed ASAP.
 

Wokis

macrumors 6502a
Jul 3, 2012
931
1,276
Yes, Intel MBA had fans because Intel chips ran hot. If you put fans in a 15" Air, you can't call it an Air anymore in my opinion. People are now accustomed to Air = no fans.
Out of touch geeks on enthusiast forums are accustomed ;)

The masses don’t know if an MBA has a fan or not. It’s not like fans are expensive, either.
 

kiranmk2

macrumors 68000
Oct 4, 2008
1,666
2,308

Do people really think Apple will use a one-year-old SoC to introduce arguably their most important Mac?
Yes, because it it will sell well no matter what chip Apple puts in. Then they can sell an M3 version later in the year and make twice the money off some people...
 

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,438
2,664
OBX
Intel Macs had to have fans because they are incapable of making processors that can survive without some form of active cooling solution. Apple Silicon is a different beast entirely. The fanless and completely silent operation of the AS Airs has become a hallmark of that product line.
So we are just gonna pretend the 12" MacBook didn't exist?
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,521
19,674
So we are just gonna pretend the 12" MacBook didn't exist?

Intel's thermal issues only started with Coffee Lake in 2017. Skylake CPUs had great performance and good power consumption. The Y-series chips originally used in the 12" MB used as much power as Mx series (maybe even less), but they were also a good deal slower than other mobile chips. Notice how Apple discontinued the 12" exactly when it was clear that Intel was not able to deliver faster Y-series without increasing power consumption. Already the Kaby Lake models were running hotter than predecessors from what I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
Intel's thermal issues only started with Coffee Lake in 2017. Skylake CPUs had great performance and good power consumption. The Y-series chips originally used in the 12" MB used as much power as Mx series (maybe even less), but they were also a good deal slower than other mobile chips. Notice how Apple discontinued the 12" exactly when it was clear that Intel was not able to deliver faster Y-series without increasing power consumption. Already the Kaby Lake models were running hotter than predecessors from what I remember.
Interestingly, Coffee Lake felt rushed because AMD was selling 8-core Zen CPUs with mainstream prices while Intel was selling 4-core variants at the same price point. So Intel upped core count to 6 with Coffee Lake which led to much higher power consumption.
 

MayaUser

macrumors 68040
Nov 22, 2021
3,177
7,196
If it isn’t fanless, they won’t call it an Air. They would call it a Pro. There is already a Pro.

The expectation is that it’ll have the same thickness and the same design as the 13” Air but just a larger screen. It’s a formula that works well and sells well. Adding a fan in there is less appealing and makes the base M version worse.
Why in the past the fan Air was called Air when we already had Pro?
fanless is not the Air...Apple had fan Macbook Air for so long...the first fanless was the 12" Macbook
So you dont know.That said, im not saying you are wrong ! Apple can bring another fanless Air to the table but probably not the 3nm one
 

MayaUser

macrumors 68040
Nov 22, 2021
3,177
7,196
I'm pretty sure most people universally thought the laptop ran too slow and hot. Apple discontinued it after 2 or 3 models.
ofc...with Intel inside...but with a brand new "3nm" that could be a great addition
Just replace the current 13" Mba in 2024 and go for the 12.3" Mba and the 15" Mba with "3nm"
I know the 12" was loved by many because of what it was from design/dimensions point of view but with a brand new M3 it can be almost without past compromises
 

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,438
2,664
OBX
I'm pretty sure most people universally thought the laptop ran too slow and hot. Apple discontinued it after 2 or 3 models.
I was arguing semantics. Intel did build a chip that doesn't need active cooling (though active cooling would probably make things better).
 

dmccloud

macrumors 68040
Sep 7, 2009
3,142
1,899
Anchorage, AK
Interestingly, Coffee Lake felt rushed because AMD was selling 8-core Zen CPUs with mainstream prices while Intel was selling 4-core variants at the same price point. So Intel upped core count to 6 with Coffee Lake which led to much higher power consumption.

Not the first time Intel's solution was to throw more power at it...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.