Yes, and Google also pays Apple billions of dollars to keep Google the default search engine in Safari. That doesn't mean that Apple is giving all email information to Google and Facebook, which is again what I was responding to and is again something they don't do.
Point taken. It's just a high holy embarrassement how people buy into Apple's "all or nothing" marketing blitz about privacy when the reality is that privacy related to advertising is both widely overblown as an exposure vector, and not even protected to any great degree on Apple's own platforms.
If you think Google, Facebook, and the rest of the marketing/advertising industry are *
materially* slowed down by Apple's antics, you're dreaming. Inconvenienced, sure. The problem is the advertising industry itself and its approach to
wanting to target individuals in search of manufactured returns, something Apple itself is wholeheartedly engaged in with its own advertising push. There is no winning against a concept where idea is that end users need to be convinced of a need or a want through marketing versus end users identifying their own needs and wants and pursuing them accordingly. The idea of Apple, a company whose bottom-of-pyramid base is the most finely tuned marketing machine ever created, being a warrior against the worst excesses of advertising, is laugh-out-loud funny.
The greater damage here, on display in this thread, is people imagining that somehow iCloud is more "secure" than any other email provider, due to Apple's marketing pap, and that's patently false. Email is email. Assume it all
can be compromised. Ask yourself instead how big of a target you and your emails
actually are.