Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you feel "What happens on your iPhone stays on your iPhone" is false advertising?

  • Yes

    Votes: 157 68.0%
  • No

    Votes: 74 32.0%

  • Total voters
    231

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
I do not care about these "numbers" - it is about the fact that there is a routine on my device that calculates "numbers" of my images and compares it with the "numbers" of these illicit pictures, which I am suspected to own, like you. Lets hope, you have not too many images (of one in the trillion) that match theses "numbers" on your device.
Same exact chances as being done in the cloud and you can stop all of it's activities if you disable icloud photo library, so what's your point?
 

Mega ST

macrumors 6502
Feb 11, 2021
362
507
Europe
The easy way out for them would be to do it on their own servers only and guarantee to respect their user devices privacy once and for all.

Unfortuntaley moving to private user devices feels like something bigger is planned with fighting against stored child porn just being the first icebreaker topic nobody can morally oppose.
 

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
The easy way out for them would be to do it on their own servers only and guarantee to respect their user devices privacy once and for all.

Unfortuntaley moving to private user devices feels like something bigger is planned with fighting against stored child porn just being the first icebreaker topic nobody can morally oppose.
It's actually more secure when done on your device. That way the cloud can be encrypted fully and then nobody would be able to access your photos except for you, but okay.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dk001

Jemani

macrumors regular
Feb 15, 2012
129
61
Can't they already do all of this server-side (if they wanted to)? Whats the difference here?
I wish they would do it server side. Not on my phone. My photos should be mine, not just in responsibility, but in privacy.
 

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
I wish they would do it server side. Not on my phone. My photos should be mine, not just in responsibility, but in privacy.
But you're willing to upload your photos to that very server that is scanning them the same way your phone would?
 

Jemani

macrumors regular
Feb 15, 2012
129
61
But you're willing to upload your photos to that very server that is scanning them the same way your phone would?
Nope. I don’t use iCloud Photos. I use my own NAS server so I have more control over photos I want to save to my cloud. I can also do a wireless Time Machine backup of my Mac also. Why should anyone care what I do with my phone? I have nothing to hide.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dk001

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
Nope. I don’t use iCloud Photos. I use my own NAS server so I have more control over photos I want to save to my cloud. I can also do a wireless Time Machine backup of my Mac also. Why should anyone care what I do with my phone? I have nothing to hide.
If you do all those things then this feature won’t work for you so what are you so upset about?
 

Jemani

macrumors regular
Feb 15, 2012
129
61
If you do all those things then this feature won’t work for you so what are you so upset about?
It’s the principal. It is my phone and my responsibility. I don’t want Apple involved with any of that. I am concerned because of the slippery slope this represents. What next? I send an iMessage to a friend about the resistance meetup in the park and Apple scans the message and the message is flagged because of a photo that goes against government guidelines. I know we all hate child molesters and predators and want them eradicated from society, but that isn’t a good enough excuse for what Apple is doing. It won’t stop child predators and sexual abuse. If Apple wants to chase child sexual abusers, they can invest their money in better more useful ways. This is just opening the door to more surveillance state. Even the ACLU was very concerned about the NDAA that every President has signed each year, even President Obama.
 

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
It’s the principal. It is my phone and my responsibility. I don’t want Apple involved with any of that. I am concerned because of the slippery slope this represents. What next? I send an iMessage to a friend about the resistance meetup in the park and Apple scans the message and the message is flagged because of a photo that goes against government guidelines. I know we all hate child molesters and predators and want them eradicated from society, but that isn’t a good enough excuse for what Apple is doing. It won’t stop child predators and sexual abuse. If Apple wants to chase child sexual abusers, they can invest their money in better more useful ways. This is just opening the door to more surveillance state. Even the ACLU was very concerned about the NDAA that every President has signed each year, even President Obama.
I think you’re thinking of something completely different. That’s the iMessage parental controls you’re thinking of and ALL of that happens only on-device. It doesn’t report to Apple or authorities. It sends a text to the parent that the kid wants to view potentially explicit content. I definitely think the parent has the right to intercept things like that.
 

Jemani

macrumors regular
Feb 15, 2012
129
61
I think you’re thinking of something completely different. That’s the iMessage parental controls you’re thinking of and ALL of that happens only on-device. It doesn’t report to Apple or authorities. It sends a text to the parent that the kid wants to view potentially explicit content. I definitely think the parent has the right to intercept things like that.
I think you are missing the point. The photo will still be in my Camera Roll and it will be scanned by Apple, if I have iCloud Photos turned on.
 

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
I think you are missing the point. The photo will still be in my Camera Roll and it will be scanned by Apple, if I have iCloud Photos turned on.
Exactly, just like how apple scans the photos for the same exact content right now.
 

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
And there is no such thing as partial freedom.
Anything you do on the internet is monitored. Do you live in some fantasy world? In iOS 15, your photos will only be hashed and compared to known CP if iCloud Photos is turned on. If you don't want that happening, don't use iCloud Photos.

Your photos were scanned before this announcement and will be scanned after this announcement. I don't get where all the hate came from suddenly.
 

Jemani

macrumors regular
Feb 15, 2012
129
61
Anything you do on the internet is monitored. Do you live in some fantasy world? In iOS 15, your photos will only be hashed and compared to known CP if iCloud Photos is turned on. If you don't want that happening, don't use iCloud Photos.

Your photos were scanned before this announcement and will be scanned after this announcement. I don't get where all the hate came from suddenly.
Hate is your words. I thought we were having a discussion.
 

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
Unfortunately the uproar is still way too miniscule. I doubt it is going to have the impact it should have
I don't think we need to make an impact. They'll do it regardless of how many people complain and to be honest, it's really a non issue for most users.
 

CTHarrryH

macrumors 68030
Jul 4, 2012
2,954
1,475
I'd still like more technical details - how much processing power is this going to take? How much battery, How much data? Will it only happen occasionally or all the time? Only when plugged in and on Wifi?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001

09872738

Cancelled
Feb 12, 2005
1,270
2,125
I don't think we need to make an impact. They'll do it regardless of how many people complain and to be honest, it's really a non issue for most users.
I agree, but it shouldn‘t be.

And people should vote with their wallets in masses. But they won‘t. Apple will continue … its a shame
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dk001

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
I abrre, but it shouldn‘t be.

And people should vote with their wallets in masses. But they won‘t. Apple will continue … its a shame
Or you know... 99.99% of people don't have that type of material, so there's nothing for them to be worried about.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dk001

Jayson A

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,671
1,935
Its not about CSAM
Its because Pandoras Box is now open and what comes next. Its unlikely to stop with CSAM
Sounds like speculation to me. There's no reason for me to believe that Apple will change their stance.
 

09872738

Cancelled
Feb 12, 2005
1,270
2,125
Maybe. I just wonder: they know the implications. They know they cannot realistically withstand requests from governments (they faltered before the Chinese and Russians).
There just is no way they could.

So I wonder why they implemented this horrible thing in the first place. They cannot be so naive as to believe they could just deny.
In other words they MUST have implemented this thing in full awareness that people will be persecuted using their tool. Just a question of time.
Which is why I cannot trust them any more. Sadly, I should add
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.