I frankly believed Apple was better than allowing a simple integer underflow issue brick the phone by letting it crash the kernel.
As Microsoft can attest to an operating without bugs, even "simple" ones is impossible.I frankly believed Apple was better than allowing a simple integer underflow issue brick the phone by letting it crash the kernel.
That was my logic when I did it.
But nope. Stupid stupid.
Already lots of info here: Don't set the date to 1 Jan 1970 on 64 bit devices.I will post more later if if I get more info.
Already lots of info here: Don't set the date to 1 Jan 1970 on 64 bit devices.
As Microsoft can attest to an operating without bugs, even "simple" ones is impossible.
Agreed. Every operating system has "simple" bugs.*are possible
Backhanded ding on Apple.What do you mean?
If you discover this bug, that's one thing. But making a video about it is irresponsible. The steps to reproduce it are so random that there's no need to warn people about it, and it couldn't happen by accident. Unless you actually want people to try it...
What more can possibly be added? Don't do it; when and if Apple has an official fix it will be in the release notes.When I refer to post more info later , I mean info from our iOS specialist , the ones who code the program.
Agreed. Every operating system has "simple" bugs.
[doublepost=1455384588][/doublepost]
Backhanded ding on Apple.
What Microsoft bug rendered a device possibly permanently bricked?As Microsoft can attest to an operating without bugs, even "simple" ones is impossible.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/121517What Microsoft bug rendered a device possibly permanently bricked?
What more can possibly be added? Don't do it; when and if Apple has an official fix it will be in the release notes.
When I refer to post more info later , I mean info from our iOS specialist , the ones who code the program.
The "is" was in reference to OS, which is singular (and I believe it was "impossible").No, you said "simple ones is possible" but, that doesn't make sense grammatically.
In that case shouldn't it be "are" not "is"? I don't fully understand the sentence though.The "is" was in reference to OS, which is singular (and I believe it was "impossible").
Since the "grammar police" are out, instead of "making", the correct word is "coding" or "programming".In that case shouldn't it be "are" not "is"? I don't fully understand the sentence though.
@Jayson A
Edit: It's the lack of commas (and some missing words) that were a bit confusing, fixed: As Microsoft can attest to, making an operating system without bugs, even "simple" ones, is impossible.
Anyway I just tried it on a iPhone 6s in a far away Apple store.Phone isn't booting.I tiptoed out before anyone could notice lol
I did it because I was curious exactly how it looked
so blame Apple engineers for not being competent enough to not see this in QA testing