Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

marksman

macrumors 603
Jun 4, 2007
5,764
5
I bet he does not have IP rights to the image he used for the diamond, just call it a hunch.

So whomever has those rights might want a piece of the pie.
 

Dontdothat317

macrumors member
Mar 29, 2007
62
12
Hi. I´m a sdk developer for the iphone.

Even if you say that Apple have a responebility and they have, no doubt .its still wrong .

All developers have a respnebility themself not to make this kind of things that it ment to fool people.

but there will always be people trying to exploit any systems out there for there goal to make a buck.

This just brings up an interesting point to me. Apple is kind of "proprietary" with their Iphone platform, software, and app store. If they want to be in control of it all, they better be ready to handle things like this happening because they created the environment for such issues to present themselves. WM would never have such an issue, because not everything goes through a central, regulated system such as the app store.

I concur that Apple needs to review apps before they go up on the app store... or at least do a slightly better job. It's unfair to everyone - yes even the developer, for things like this to happen. Nonetheless, yeah your finger should not have been anywhere near that buy button. If you can afford to be so stupid with your money, its your choice and no one else's what you do with your money.
 

NotFound

macrumors 6502a
Nov 30, 2006
792
0
Hi. I´m a sdk developer for the iphone.

To state it shortly . The developer behind this app is an Ass****

No doubt

Its wrong in any way to fool customers. Even if you say that Apple have a responebility and they have, no doubt .its still wrong .

How did this application fool anyone? The description and title clearly stated what the app was intended for and why.



I feel realy bad for thouse people who accedently bought the app and I hope they get there app back and that the developer gets nothing or is forced to pay back the money.

I dont feel sorry for anyone. And I hope they don't get their money back.

I can not discuss the legal terms of putting apps on itunes app store but read the legal terms yourself and you will found out more...

True that.
 

Phil A.

Moderator emeritus
Apr 2, 2006
5,800
3,100
Shropshire, UK
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 16GB: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5F97 Safari/525.20)

I'm guessing the reason Apple pulled it is to stop thousands of copycat programs being launched by other devs: one stupid thousand dollar app may be funny, but a thousand of them would simply make the whole app store concept a joke. Apple have drawn a line in the sand and hopefully stopped that happening
 

Chicane-UK

macrumors 6502
Apr 26, 2008
444
1,085
I dont feel sorry for anyone. And I hope they don't get their money back.

You're right on the money IMHO. I was going to reply to the post you made but you beat me to it and said all I wanted to say. I don't see how this was deceiving anyone - the application explained exactly what it did (or didn't!) do and the price is there in black and white on the screen before you purchase it.

People need to start taking responsibility for their own stupidity - I hope all 8 of those people inadvertantly bought it and got burned. They certainly won't do it again.
 

tk421

macrumors 6502a
Dec 7, 2005
655
5
Los Angeles
You're right, those are the terms of sale. Is that going to stop any purchasers from refuting the charges? No. ...And in the case that Apple refused to rescind the charge, they would most likely loose a customer for life. Is that what they want? Is that what Apple stock-holders would want?

Why did Apple chose not to allow porn? Because it wouldn't sell? (Yeah, right.) No, it's because it would reflect poorly on them as a company.

You need to remember that public perception for business can lead to either success or bankruptcy. ...You can't just run a business based on ideal-world situations.

All this back and forth with EricNau. Eric is 100% right.

Sure, the app was funny. Yes, idiots may deserve to lose their money. And absolutely the app was not dishonest or a scam. It may even be possible that some of the 8 chose to buy the app knowing full well what it was (though I suspect all 8 probably made a stupid mistake).

All of that is irrelevant if the app makes Apple look bad. And if there is any doubt, just look at the reviews the app got. Obviously it's down now, but it was several hundred 1-star reviews from people complaining about Apple and/or the developer. There were positive reviews from those that found it funny, but these were by far the minority.
 

NotFound

macrumors 6502a
Nov 30, 2006
792
0
People need to start taking responsibility for their own stupidity - I hope all 8 of those people inadvertantly bought it and got burned. They certainly won't do it again.

Well, I'd have to say you put it better than I.
 

KingYaba

macrumors 68040
Aug 7, 2005
3,414
12
Up the irons
Friend sent me this. I'm taking the liberty of sharing. :)
 

Attachments

  • vfeo5.png
    vfeo5.png
    71.1 KB · Views: 181

guet

macrumors member
Sep 24, 2003
88
0
Even if Apple did pull it, he still won.​

I doubt very much this cretin will actually be paid any of that money - Apple holds it for 2 weeks or something, and will most likely just refund anyone who bought the app, so he'll be out $99 and a whole lot of goodwill for nothing.
 

sushi

Moderator emeritus
Jul 19, 2002
15,639
3
キャンプスワ&#
No, merely suggesting that it's bad business to take advantage of your customers.
Guess we disagree on this point.

I do not see how this app listing was taking advantage of the customer in any way.

All developers have a respnebility themself not to make this kind of things that it ment to fool people.
Say what?

The app listing clearly stated what was being offered. There was no misrepresentation with the listing.

but there will always be people trying to exploit any systems out there for there goal to make a buck.
I don't see it this way. The app maker did not deceive anybody with his listing. All was clearly stated.

I feel realy bad for thouse people who accedently bought the app and I hope they get there app back and that the developer gets nothing or is forced to pay back the money.
How do we know that they all "accidentally" purchased the app.

Are you saying that none of the 8 wanted to purchase the app?

How did this application fool anyone? The description and title clearly stated what the app was intended for and why.
Agree.

I dont feel sorry for anyone. And I hope they don't get their money back.[/QUOTE]
Agree.

I don't see how this was deceiving anyone - the application explained exactly what it did (or didn't!) do and the price is there in black and white on the screen before you purchase it.
Exactly.

People need to start taking responsibility for their own stupidity - I hope all 8 of those people inadvertantly bought it and got burned. They certainly won't do it again.
How do we know for sure that they inadvertently purchased the app?
 

RaZaK

macrumors regular
Jul 13, 2008
224
0
I'm not surprised.

oh please, please, please, please Apple, release the names of these idiots so that we can tar and feather them...or grease and spoon them.

5 bonus points to anyone who gets the reference at the end of the above sentence.:)
 

koobcamuk

macrumors 68040
Oct 23, 2006
3,195
10
I dont think the developer is a genius or smart in anyway .. are you smart if you do something illegal ... i dont think so ...

What exactly is he doing that's illegal? The price limit is set by Apple. Why don't they lower it if this is the reason?

$5,600 off the stupidity of some people. I like that.

Apple made money from this too you know... maybe it would generate bad press for them if they made a lot of money this way. Who knows. Relatively a lot - i.e. to me, not to Apple.

Furthermore, I doubt Apple screen prices as this really isn't up to them; they should just protect against malicious content and porn. I wonder why they cancelled it.

Friend sent me this. I'm taking the liberty of sharing. :)

It's not a scam. This guy deserves that. Total idiot. There are consequences in this world.
 

JesterJJZ

macrumors 68020
Jul 21, 2004
2,461
823
The developer was smart. Talk about making a quick 6 grand..

I see no problem making money on stupid people. Serves them right. I don't care what anyone says, the developer is a genius. You all just wish you thought of it first.
 

cocky jeremy

macrumors 604
Jul 12, 2008
6,500
7,167
Thats exactly what people do who lack morals. Fixed that for you. They have a word for lying to get money/stuff.

How do they lack morals? They clearly stated what it was for. If you purchased it, it was because you chose to. They weren't taking advantage of anyone.

I think we're all jealous. The developer is a genius, and Apple is wrong for pulling it.

Bingo!
 

P-Worm

macrumors 68020
Jul 16, 2002
2,045
1
Salt Lake City, UT
To all the people that say that Apple was wrong in pulling this application, maybe you should look at all of the negative feedback Apple has in this thread alone. That doesn't sound like good business to me.

I think that those that bought the application on accident (it's entirely possible that someone's kid did it - and don't think it couldn't happen to you) should get a refund. If the buyers really just wanted to buy this to prove how rich they are, I have no problems with them keeping it.

When I first heard about the app, I thought it was pretty funny. Later it occurred to me that having an application like this in the store is a breeding ground for copy cats. I sure don't want to have to weed through an endless sea of $1000 applications.

I think that pulling the application was a good business move by Apple.

P-Worm
 

BoyBach

macrumors 68040
Feb 24, 2006
3,031
13
I notice that some people are describing this App as art. Dear me, we're not setting that bar very high these days.

As for the eight sales, they do that there's one born every minute!
 

mrkgoo

macrumors 65816
Aug 18, 2005
1,178
3
Friend sent me this. I'm taking the liberty of sharing. :)

Actually -the app was far from fake, and very genuine!

I feel sorry for those that bought it accidentally (as in accidentally clicked it - if anyone clicked it deliberately, that's another story - even if they thought it was a joke). Sure, there was no ruse behind this app, but Apple's reaction to these mistakes is paid back to their reputation.

The app was amusing, and a stroke of genius in regards to marketing the developer's name and other apps. It, however, is a really *******-ish thing to release upon the public, and Apple is part way to blame. Apple is right to pull this app, because it reflects poorly on the AppStore. Will anyone visit and purchase when it's just full of 'joke' apps? Arguably, the countless flashlight apps also make a bit of mockery out of the store, but they're not $999 jokes. Regardless, Apple will have to balance the appstore with reason - keep it so apps are genuinely useful, without distancing the developer community with too much control.
 

reflex

macrumors 6502a
May 19, 2002
721
0
I don't know about the 'Magic' bowl but I do know that when you go to iTunes store and go to TERMS OF SALE you have this written VERY CLEARLY:



REFUND POLICY

All Sales and rentals (as applicable) are final.


Anybody complaining after purchase is just a PLAIN IDIOT. Simple and a fact UNLESS he bought something that is not matching the product description.

Not in Belgium though (and possibly other places). Because it's a sale "at a distance" (literal translation), the buyer has 7 days to change his mind. I'm not sure if there are any exceptions to this, though.

And the one-click buy system is definitely not a good idea for anything costing more than a cd or a movie.

But I agree that those people should have thought a little bit harder before clicking that button.
 

Stella

macrumors G3
Apr 21, 2003
8,883
6,477
Canada
Friend sent me this. I'm taking the liberty of sharing. :)

What happened to personal responsibility and why would this person think its a joke?

If some one wants to sell an app for $999 then let them - the developer explicitly said what he was selling. The people who bought this got what was advertised. It wasn't a scam.

For those thinking this is a 'scam', here's a definition to refresh their memories:
http://www.eecl.org/scam/definition.shtml

This app does not in anyway fall in to the definition of 'scam'.

The Reg sums up this person very well "'I blame everyone but myself' ( seen from the home page of Register )
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/07/poor_man_buys_i_am_rich_app/
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.