Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

Are you experiencing this issue?


  • Total voters
    1,931
Considering Apple’s future investments in OLED and micro-OLED, they need to figure out how to develop a flicker-free brightness controller sooner rather than later.

OLED televisions are flicker-free, so there’s no technical reason that the panel can’t be driven by voltage-based DC dimming. Perhaps there are drawbacks, but it’s technically possible to drive these OLED panels without PWM or flickering.
My guess is that in a Smartphone implementation there is more of a focus on power management. They are constantly adjusting brightness and refresh rate (on the promotion devices) on phones. I don’t think that’s an issue on a TV. But I don’t really know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idktbh and 5105973
Decided to return my 14 pro and stay with my 13 mini after the former induced eye strain and nausea almost immediately. The 13 mini is pretty much fine for my eyes (even with the bit of OLED “bite” I get while scrolling; its worst effects pale in comparison to how the pro made me feel). Onscreen motion on the 13 mini also feels better-tuned on this latest 16.1 beta—scrolling especially looks less choppy/abrasive—which hopefully Apple keeps up.

I tried and loved the SE third-gen but decided to return that as well because I dearly missed the design, size, cameras, and even the display of the mini. But it (the SE) is definitely a solid second choice.

TL;DR—14 pro is the worst OLED iPhone for my personal ocular comfort since the XS (which was the whole reason I found this thread to begin with).
 
Last edited:
Since today I also have the Pixel 7pro and also confirm. Pixel 7 pro is better for my eyes than iPhone 14 pro
Nice to hear that. I can now confirm that the aftermath is the same as with the 14pro, nausia, neck and jaw tension... i even have a feeling that its worse than with the 14 pro now...... I will definitely test some more before i can draw any conclusion.
 
All of that being said, we could say that Apple is ignoring us. Yet they have been making minor improvements every year, and I do think iPhone 13 was the first time we saw a diligent effort by Apple to create a solution: they advertised a ‘New display engine’ quite proudly at the keynote, then iPhone 13 Pro had 510Hz quasi-DC dimming as well as iPhone 13 Mini and 610Hz on iPhone 13.

Unfortunately none of these devices worked significantly better for me to the point I could use one without constant or persistent headaches. As one of the most sensitive users it’s understandable, but that means that we still don’t have a real solution. It’s almost like they pulled back slightly on iPhone 14 once they realized that was the case, and hopefully we see the display team attempt a similar level of improvement on iPhone 15–and this time create a definitive solution that works for every PWM-sensitive user.
I dunno, the 11 Pro recently was pretty much no problems and the 13 mini recently gave me sharper pain than the 11 Pro, and after using the 14 pro for four days now, the 13 mini gave me more pain than the 14 Pro does now, so remembering back a year ago, it’s like every iteration they’re testing different things 🤷
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
To my understanding, DC dimming does not remove the flickering completely and will not solve the pwm problem for most of the users in this forum, only the less sensitive ones. Explanation Here.
It was painted as our Holy Grail, but it really is not.

Look at the new profile of the new Zenfone 9 for example, which is DC dimmed and I still could not use:

RigolDS48.jpg


THe flicker is constant at 120hz, which means I did not have raging headaches straight away but only dizziness and brain fog when I tried the phone (or maybe I did not try it long enough for those crazy headaches). That did not make it usable and eventually I returned it.

What we want is something like the iphone 8 plus, which does not flicker ever never forever:

PWM.png


I have seen many complain about notebookcheck's results about the flicker rate, but that does not really make sense. The way you react to the flicker is very personal and might be related to other factors, e.g. tiredness etc. Trying the device is probably the only way to determine your reaction to it. Things will not likely improve unless you completely remove the flicker. A different frequence does not really change things significantly imo.

I am very sensitive it seems, specially if I am tired, and I can feel dizziness even when using devices with 50000 hz refresh rate. At work we have so many meeting rooms with flickering screens, and I am usually able to survive those without problems when rested, since I do not stare at them too long. My phone however is different, I use it for so many things and for so long everyday, that even a very low flickering will affect me in the long run.


Now, as many have complained in this thread and in here, PWM is not the only problem for some of us.
It seems that newer lcd phones and apple display also use another digital trick called temphoral dithering ( Dithering Device vs non-Dithering Device) to make that sweet million of colours reproduction. The way I see it, it is a "colour flickering" causing similar symptoms to PWM, albeit milder.
The group of people affected by dithering is even smaller than the pwm crowd I suspect, so good luck hoping that Apple will improve things in the future.

To be honest, the future is bleak for sensitive apple users.
Both technologies give clear advantages, the way I see it, being those better power management or better colour reproduction. Why would Apple not offer these things to the hundred of millions of customers that have zero problems with such displays? One of their strategies has always been to have a small lineup, it lowers the manufacturing costs, mantainance etc etc. Our group is way too small to make financially sense for them.


Ps. someone correct me if I said something factually wrong, I think we are all learning here.
Holy Cow those videos are enlightening to me. I think temporal dithering is actually a bigger problem for my brain than pwm. It would explain why I was able to use OLED Android phones for years. I did get eye strain from my S7 and S7 Edge but not neurological problems.

I can not at all look at lasers. I mean the kinds used at concerts. I can’t go to concerts at all and I had to quit watching the TV show The Voice because they use lasers a lot in the performances and I did used to drop with seizures from how the laser beams appear to shake slightly and rapidly.

But oddly I can handle some strobe lights that are on amusement park rides. My family was always confused about that because they’d be trying to shield me from every kind of flashing like one would do for someone with epilepsy. But we found it wasn’t necessary. I may not always be comfortable, as a migraine sufferer, with flashing lights. But only a very specific kind seems to actually cause me seizure migraine.

Even my neurologist at the time was not sure we were dealing with epilepsy. She said it appears close but not exactly like epilepsy. She decided to give me the option to defer an epilepsy diagnosis because my state laws would basically end my life as I know it. She felt it was not necessary to do that to me and there was still some uncertainty on how to label my “condition”. So “atypical migraine” was the best fit.

Anyway, getting back to the temporal dithering, that little fast shaking reminds me of the kind of motion in laser light that makes me so sick.

I’m getting closer to understanding now why I was having a white flickering curtain at the edge of my vision with LCD.

What I don’t know is if there’s temporal dithering in the LCD Nintendo Switch display. That display caused me some discomfort too.

I’m not entirely comfortable with the M1 Air MacBook display. Even when I turn brightness down there’s something about it that makes it hard to focus sometimes and makes my eyeballs feel like they’re being seared. But I’m not on that display enough hours per day to be a major issue. I play games on it. I don’t game all that often. I was planning to do movie and photo editing on it but haven’t had time to really learn how yet.

Thank you for sharing those videos.
 
Time for a status update. I’m having mostly good luck on my 14 pro, or I should say my second 14 pro. Every once in a while though, I will get a little motion sickness or dizziness but they seem few and far between. I have not tried to go back to my 11 yet and see if anything persists.

I’ve been trying different settings than what I’m used to on my LCD screens. Thanks to DJTaurus, I am flirting with light mode and in certain situations that is helping. Currently I have promotion on but I am still messing with that to see what’s going on.
I also always used to have my display zoomed because my eyes aren’t what they used to be. But I find that makes things blurry and causes its own eye strain so I have switched on this OLED screen to standard view and just pumped up the text size a bit. That seems to have made a difference.

I’ve always had attention aware features turned off on Face ID and reduce motion enabled. I recently also enabled reduce transparency and that actually helps with the blurry wallpaper background nausea effect.
However, the thing that reducing motion and reducing transparency does is make the phone feel a bit less snappy and you don’t get those snazzy animations that are shown on Apple commercials or in YouTube reviews.
But hey, they both seem to help me.

And true tone is off at all times and I use Night Shift in the evening.

So those are all the settings that deviate from the norm that I feel that are helping me.
Hopefully some of them might be useful to any of you.

Oh yes, one final thing, I also turn the brightness down to about 55 or 60%. In the past I’ve been worried to do that because OLEDS seem to flicker more if you don’t have the brightness all the way on. However my thinking is that because the new pro screens are so much brighter that scale might be moved downward and also I remember MichaelSD saying something about flickering below 39%.
Anyway, having it a little lower seems to not have the retina melting effects. The screen is warmer on the second pro then the first one I tried out so that may also help?
 
I’m curious why the 8 is okay for so many people and it had the p3 wide color.

In my case, the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus are both definitely NOT ok. I have both but primarily use the 8 Plus. Before I got the 8 Plus about 6 months ago, I was using a 6 Plus all day long for 6 years and that phone never bothered me one bit (except for its slowness).

Then I got an Apple refurbished 8 Plus and its been a slow downhill slog ever since. Ruining my eyes and brain. I can no longer tolerate viewing that screen with its obscene LSD enhanced colors. I now use it in grayscale exclusively. So much for Retina HD. Ive come to the conclusion that the 8 series LCD screens are garbage too. All the colors are too intense and vivid.

Nobody has been able to officially verify if it uses temporal dithering but I suspect it does, because to my eyes it seems to sort of shimmer in a barely perceptible way.

I know I can’t look at those screens very long that’s for sure.
Whenever I go back to my 6 Plus its such a relief. Natural looking colors and a much more pleasing display to look at even though it does blow out white highlights.
 
In my case, the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus are both definitely NOT ok. I have both but primarily use the 8 Plus. Before I got the 8 Plus about 6 months ago, I was using a 6 Plus all day long for 6 years and that phone never bothered me one bit (except for its slowness).

Then I got an Apple refurbished 8 Plus and its been a slow downhill slog ever since. Ruining my eyes and brain. I can no longer tolerate viewing that screen with its obscene LSD enhanced colors. I now use it in grayscale exclusively. So much for Retina HD. Ive come to the conclusion that the 8 series LCD screens are garbage too. All the colors are too intense and vivid.

Nobody has been able to officially verify if it uses temporal dithering but I suspect it does, because to my eyes it seems to sort of shimmer in a barely perceptible way.

I know I can’t look at those screens very long that’s for sure.
Whenever I go back to my 6 Plus its such a relief. Natural looking colors and a much more pleasing display to look at even though it does blow out white highlights.
It's not the 6, but I have very fond memories of the gold 7 when I got it and had it for two years. it was an amazing device coming from 5s. I think the best think about it was the keyboard was bigger, haha, and I made WHOLE lot less typing mistakes.
 
It's not the 6, but I have very fond memories of the gold 7 when I got it and had it for two years. it was an amazing device coming from 5s. I think the best think about it was the keyboard was bigger, haha, and I made WHOLE lot less typing mistakes.
I remember fondly the days when we could use these iPhones without issues. Although to be fair my favorite modern iPhones were iPhone 12 Pro Max in Pacific Blue, then iPhone 13 Mini in Blue, then to be quite honest I’m not sure yet for iPhone 14.
 
Just received my pixel 7 pro and it feels better than the 14pro after 45 min of playing with the device. Anyone else have experience with this device?
Same here. I still notice eye strain and slight dizziness but it’s miles better than the iPhone 14 Pro or iPhone 14 Pro Max. It took less than a minute for dizziness to set in when using the iPhones. But I was able to use the Pixel 7 Pro for around 30 minutes.
 
Same here. I still notice eye strain and slight dizziness but it’s miles better than the iPhone 14 Pro or iPhone 14 Pro Max. It took less than a minute for dizziness to set in when using the iPhones. But I was able to use the Pixel 7 Pro for around 30 minutes.
Same here..😉
So the pixel 7 pro is not perfect.. but I can use it longer without dizziness and headaches.. With the 14 pro, the dizziness came faster.. I don't know why either..

In addition there is another app called pwm free.. you can install it on android devices. Maybe a little less eye strain
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JM
I found a post on Candle Power Forums from 2007 which I thought may be of interest to this group. I always thought PWM was more energy efficient than constant current in all cases. It's not true. Summary is in red, at the bottom.

This is easy, you've provided all the needed information, just calculate it.

Constant current:
1000mA: 220 lm, 3.4W, 65 lm/W
100mA: 33 lm, 0.29W, 114 lm/W
10mA: 4 lm, 0.027W, 148 lm/W

Now for the PWM:
100%: 220 lm, 3.4W, 65 lm/W

10%: 22 lm, 0.34W, 65 lm/W
Calculations:
output = 220 lm * 10% = 22 lm
power usage = 3.4V * 1A * 10% = 0.34W
efficiency = 22lm / 0.34W = 65 lm/W

1%: 2.2 lm, 0.034W, 65 lm/W
Calculations:
output = 220 lm * 1% = 2.2 lm
power usage = 3.4V * 1A * 1% = 0.034W
efficiency = 2.2 lm / 0.034W = 65 lm/W (seeing a pattern here?)

Let's bring it all together:
At 1000mA/100%, they're both the same (as expected)

At 100mA/10%, constant current outputs 34 lm vs 22 lm (50% more), and uses 0.29W vs 0.34W. Constant current efficiency is almost double that of PWM.

At 10mA, 1%, constant current outputs 4 lm vs 2.2 (almost double), and uses 0.027W vs 0.034W. Constant current efficiency is more than double that of PWM.

Once you exceed a certain frequency with PWM, your eyes integrate the individual pulses into a continuous light source, the apparent brightness which is equal to the average brightness over time. Thus, the calculated output due to the PWM duty cycle matches exactly with what your eyes will perceive the brightness to be.

Notice that with PWM, things don't get any more efficient with lower current, which is a defining characteristic of LEDs. PWM is less efficient than constant current for dimming LEDs. People do not use PWM to increase efficiency with LEDs, they use it to reduce the color shifting that happens when you dim an LED. However, the color shifting is not something that's noticeable or that even matters for general lighting applications, so when trying to efficiently dim an LED, PWM is definitely not the way to go.

Apple may be using PWM solely because of the minuscule, unnoticeable color accuracy gains. Such a shame.
 
Last edited:
I found a post on Candle Power Forums from 2007 which I thought may be of interest to this group. I always thought PWM was more energy efficient than constant current in all cases. It's not true. Summary is in red, at the bottom.



Apple may be using PWM solely because of the minuscule, unnoticeable color accuracy gains. Such a shame.
thanks for your contribution.
Apple Marketing Blabla Energy efficiency 🙈
With a constant analog current, the led would probably display diffuse colors.. This is how Notebookcheck described it in an article..
 
In my case, the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus are both definitely NOT ok. I have both but primarily use the 8 Plus. Before I got the 8 Plus about 6 months ago, I was using a 6 Plus all day long for 6 years and that phone never bothered me one bit (except for its slowness).

Then I got an Apple refurbished 8 Plus and its been a slow downhill slog ever since. Ruining my eyes and brain. I can no longer tolerate viewing that screen with its obscene LSD enhanced colors. I now use it in grayscale exclusively. So much for Retina HD. Ive come to the conclusion that the 8 series LCD screens are garbage too. All the colors are too intense and vivid.

Nobody has been able to officially verify if it uses temporal dithering but I suspect it does, because to my eyes it seems to sort of shimmer in a barely perceptible way.

I know I can’t look at those screens very long that’s for sure.
Whenever I go back to my 6 Plus its such a relief. Natural looking colors and a much more pleasing display to look at even though it does blow out white highlights.
I had an 8 plus for a while and I felt my 6s had a more comfortable screen. With the 8 plus I had to set brightness manually to 80%, disable True Tone, and set it to zoomed and then it was better. Still not as good as my 6s though.
 
As you may have seen, their source for the PWM info is notebookcheck
I think accurately measuring flicker is becoming harder and harder. These phones have variable refresh rates, variable brightness rates, temporal dithering etc. anyones guess how that all shows up on a measurement device. Like does the 14 pro flicker the same at 10hz and 50% brightness as it does at 120hz? Probably not… lots of variables to consider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idktbh and john g.
I think accurately measuring flicker is becoming harder and harder. These phones have variable refresh rates, variable brightness rates, temporal dithering etc. anyones guess how that all shows up on a measurement device. Like does the 14 pro flicker the same at 10hz and 50% brightness as it does at 120hz? Probably not… lots of variables to consider.
This!!!
 
I think accurately measuring flicker is becoming harder and harder. These phones have variable refresh rates, variable brightness rates, temporal dithering etc. anyones guess how that all shows up on a measurement device. Like does the 14 pro flicker the same at 10hz and 50% brightness as it does at 120hz? Probably not… lots of variables to consider.
Very true. I plan to test these phones with many different configurations once my photodiodes arrive tomorrow. In the case of the iPhone 14 (Pro), I believe NotebookCheck said they do not use temporal dithering at all, so that is one variable removed from the equation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.