Not quite sure what my "mistake" is. I've made it pretty clear my background is in Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM), where ideas, reasoning and thoughts are either correct, or incorrect. I'm not saying I'm always right, but FaceID is either safe to use, or it's not. Views and opinions are relevant in Arts and Politics, but not in Science and Engineering problems, like this. The exchange of ideas, reasoning and thoughts in an Engineering-based situation is meaningless if it does not eventually result in one side or the other being convinced, and eventual consensus.
So basically, what I'm saying is your admission that you cannot be convinced is an admission that this entire thread is, and has always been, pointless.
What you said is true only in maths pretty much(and some topics in philosophy).
Ideas and thought are eventually proven correct or incorrect in Science. They are not correct just in themselves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Even more so in Biology and Medicine.
Yes, FaceID is either safe or not. You, or me, are in no position to determine that. We don't even know the exact specs.
I am sorry that your only quest here is to try to change other people's mind or maybe satisfy your ego. I thought you were better than that.
Last edited: