Puh, never thought I would agree with one of your postings, but here we go.
Haha - perhaps I'm not the Apple fanboy people here make me out to be.
Puh, never thought I would agree with one of your postings, but here we go.
Haha - perhaps I'm not the Apple fanboy people here make me out to be.
Haha, I really had to read twice, if it's really you making such statement.
I think, in my defenses of Apple, people mistake a hatred for Android where none exists. Mainly my posts seem skewed toward defense of iOS because generally I tend to respond to posts I feel are making uneven arguments.
I then feel the need to create and present the counter argument so all views can be shared.
It is true, I have had a distaste for Samsung, mainly stemming from their advertising campaigns (though they have gotten better of late) and the fact that many of their practices and fans seem to have become the very thing they sought out to destroy/belittle (Apple's practices/fans). Just all seems very hypocritical. And to be perfectly honest, I am drawn to the Galaxy S line (I'm seriously thinking my next Android - in 2014 - will be the next Galaxy *S5*)
My personal beliefs - I like iOS and Android. If forced to make the choice, I'd take iOS due to my use of Macs (an iMac and a Macbook Air) and my familiarity with the platform (though I've grown very familiar with Android over the last year as well). Both offer strengths and both have weaknesses. To say one is a nightmare to use would be that person's opinion and people professing such as a fact really get under my skin.
Ultimately, I look forward to ALL new releases each year. I've already got my 2013 Android phone (HTC One) and I'm looking forward to the 2013 iPhone release. My smartphone use case has remained largely the same as I've transitioned my personal use from iPhone to Android phone which leads me to the conclusion these smartphone wars are idiotic.
One's preferences and use case will dictate what phone works best for that person. No spec sheet or feature set alone will do the trick - and simply comparing such metrics doesn't begin to answer the question: What smartphone is best for me? And that's ultimately, the only question that matters.
**(until such a time as smartphones and services begin to lag in usefulness - which I can tell you, "even with an iPhone" is NOT the case)**
Nice write, changes the way I look at you somehow :thumbup:
I think, in my defenses of Apple, people mistake a hatred for Android where none exists. Mainly my posts seem skewed toward defense of iOS because generally I tend to respond to posts I feel are making uneven arguments.
Is that right?
Flip the ATIV S over and there are unexpected delights in the finish and materials used by Samsung. The Galaxy S III had a gloss plastic that never really convinced in terms of quality - the ATIV S has, in principle, the same plastic rear, but the finish chosen is the most incredibly realistic faux-brushed stainless steel
The ATIV S is not actually metal though is it? As far as I've read, its plastic with a mock brushed aluminium style finish. It looks metal, but its still plastic. So you didn't really prove any contrary point
Wow, you're right. All the impressions I read when it was first announced all said it was made of actual metal. My mistake- my apologies couchy!
I can't see why its a bonus to be able to remove the back of a phone in any case? The only reason I've ever needed to take the back cover off a phone was to either clean the dust out of it or to change a sim card. I don't keep phones for more than 2 years so changing batteries has never been a problem. If it is in the future then I will get the phone repaired under warranty.
This function argument seems slightly weak as a company like Apple hardly designs products without much thought. You can't remove the back plate on an iPhone for the simple reason being, you don't need to.
I don't doubt some people need to change a battery. I've never needed to and don't personally know anybody who carries extra batteries for their smart phones.Swapping a battery is an important function to some. You can find remote ways of charging most batteries. Yet the best route is usually swapping out the actual battery. Devices and tools that are important to keep working have replaceable batteries, camera for a photographer, tools for construction workers, mobile medical equipment (diabetic pump), all equipment for police/fire/rescue.
My mobile devices are the only devices I have that don't have a replaceable battery and they can at times control my life. I'm one of those people that are sitting on an airport floor near an outlet charging my iPhone because the alternatives aren't very good. The best alternative is to just not use my phone as much.
Huge charging case and remote chargers aren't very good options for everyone. I use a lifeproof case so mophie is out and carrying wires and batteries through airport security is a hassle.
Btw you know you are defending "solutions" right? That means there is a problem to begin with.
One reason I can think of as to why Apple don't allow access to the battery is their warranty. They have strict return rules and check any device that is returned. I found this out the other day when my iPhone stopped recognising the sim card. I took it into Apple and they checked it over before giving me a new phone as a replacement. If they allowed people to use third party batteries, I think this opens up a problem especially if hardware is damaged. This is also a reason I never want to see the iPhone allowing users access to the filing system. I think tampering with devices on certain levels creates problems. I know on here its more enthusiasts who love this sort of thing, but personally I don't know anyone who uses mobile phones the way in which some of you demand on here. I can only really form opinions on personal experiences really.