You do realise it's a removable backplate? Not fitting it back correctly isn't something that can't happen.
And the dent on the aluminum band on the left?
You do realise it's a removable backplate? Not fitting it back correctly isn't something that can't happen.
So basically the GS4 is a thinner GS3 on the outside? Lame......
*mimics critics who said the same thing when the iPhone 5 came out mentioning how it looked just like the 4/4S.......*
But, 441 ppi is impressive. Cool that it is LTE Advanced ready..... Just hope the US doesn't get screwed again and doesn't get the Exynos 5 CPU......
Talk about poor QC. Look at the pic from CNET. Dent on the left. Gap between the back plate and phone on right side.
Image
Come on guy, thats clearly just the back case not being fully snapped on.
I'll repeat this as much as I have to.
There's a reason why people respond to Samsung's [if true] minor S3-to-S4 upgrade differently than they do to Apple's minor upgrades.
Samsung's smartphone lineup is so much more versatile than Apple's. Samsung has a wide range of phones to cover different sizes and price levels, many of them are current generation, and offer different experiences but still remain smartphones.
With Apple, there is only one screen size that is of current generation. The smaller option is over a year old, and there's no larger screen size at all.
Also, just taking their phones at face value, the S3 offers so much more packed into it than the iPhone 5 -- in other words, it truly is hard for Samsung to introduce many hardware changes (and again, they have other lineups to cover other ground in the smartphone world). Apple, on the other hand, intentionally withholds hardware changes (they don't believe wireless charging is worth it, nor in screen size options, nor NFC, nor notification lights, nor expandable memory, etc.).
Likewise, Samsung doesn't recycle their design for two years, as Apple has been doing, and will likely continue to do with the 5S.
So, is the S3-to-S4 upgrade small? Sure -- as small as the 4S-to-5 upgrade, if you want to really compare. But does Samsung take two years to do it? No.
TL;DR: No one is giving Samsung a free pass. Samsung just has their bases more covered.
And the dent on the aluminum band on the left?
And the dent on the aluminum band on the left?
True, but the dent in the metal on the left that is more of a puzzle/concern.
I'll repeat this as much as I have to.
There's a reason why people respond to Samsung's [if true] minor S3-to-S4 upgrade differently than they do to Apple's minor upgrades.
Samsung's smartphone lineup is so much more versatile than Apple's. Samsung has a wide range of phones to cover different sizes and price levels, many of them are current generation, and offer different experiences but still remain smartphones.
With Apple, there is only one screen size that is of current generation. The smaller option is over a year old, and there's no larger screen size at all.
Also, just taking their phones at face value, the S3 offers so much more packed into it than the iPhone 5 -- in other words, it truly is hard for Samsung to introduce many hardware changes (and again, they have other lineups to cover other ground in the smartphone world). Apple, on the other hand, intentionally withholds hardware changes (they don't believe wireless charging is worth it, nor in screen size options, nor NFC, nor notification lights, nor expandable memory, etc.).
Likewise, Samsung doesn't recycle their design for two years, as Apple has been doing, and will likely continue to do with the 5S.
So, is the S3-to-S4 upgrade small? Sure -- as small as the 4S-to-5 upgrade, if you want to really compare. But does Samsung take two years to do it? No.
TL;DR: No one is giving Samsung a free pass. Samsung just has their bases more covered.
You're talking about the clear as day light reflection aren't you?
You're talking about the clear as day light reflection aren't you?
was it dropped?
No, that is a dent.
Just goes to show that metal has nothing whatsover to do on the exterior of a phone. Just look at any iPhone that has been used without a cover - not a pretty sight.And the dent on the aluminum band on the left?
No there does appear to be a dimple/dent there bottom left. Look at the finger/thumb and look down towards the back panel.
No, that is a dent.
can you guarantee that it came from the factory like that? and the dent DID NOT come from the hundreds of journalists playing with the phones (and dropping them)?
I wasn't calling the GS4 a minor upgrade. Just making fun of people that made fun of the iPhone 5 saying it was just an iPhone 4/4S just thinner and taller......
I wasn't using it as a serious knock against the phone itself. More towards the people who made fun of the iPhone 5's external design......
That said, what is the hole to the left and why does it look so janky?
To my eyes it looks like a reflection of a camera being horribly distorted by the angle of the bend of the aluminum. Note the corresponding bending of light directly atop that band.
IDK, I trust a major company like Samsung enough to ensure their PR blitz is properly equipped with grade a phones. Why would anyone working the event allow a damaged phone to be photographed instead of swapping it out with one of the other dozens of placeholders on hand? It doesn't make sense to me that this would be a dent.
Now that I'm caught up on the thread, it sounds like it's a good thing I missed the presentation!
There has been a ton of hype and build-up to this device, and ultimately, it left us feeling cold. The S IV feels uninspired. There are small spec bumps from the previous generation and there's a ton of software which will largely sit unused. There's just no wow-factor here.
These are photos that Cnet has taken themselves of a pre-production unit.Then that's a major fail on Samsung for allowing those poor pics to go out like that.
Then why would Samsung allow a photo of the back plate gap to be used?