I just want to point out this is JUST the article writer Ben Sin hypothesising. It's based on no actual evidence or inside correspondence. It's actually a non-article created solely to try drive traffic to Forbes.
How can't they figure this out? How hard could it really be?
I just want to point out this is JUST the article writer Ben Sin hypothesising. It's based on no actual evidence or inside correspondence. It's actually a non-article created solely to try drive traffic to Forbes.
That's not accurate Mru, Forbes is citing the South Korean news media Chosun Ilbo as their source:
"Now Samsung is investigating the Note 7's entire manufacturing process as well as how users typically handle the device, to see if uploading video, photos or other content may have affected the battery.
If the investigation drags on, Samsung staff fear that the release of the Galaxy S8 smartphone scheduled for early 2017 may have to be aborted."
Link is provided in the original article.
Removable batteries may NOT be the issue BUT Samsung could've saved alot of money during the first recall instead of an estimated $1B. Battery would've been easily replaced instead of the entire unit. Now Samsung is set to lose like $17B with the discontinuation of the gone too soon, Note7.
How can't they figure this out? How hard could it really be?
Again sealed batteries arent planned obsolscenceRemovable batteries may NOT be the issue BUT Samsung could've saved alot of money during the first recall instead of an estimated $1B. Battery would've been easily replaced instead of the entire unit. Now Samsung is set to lose like $17B with the discontinuation of the gone too soon, Note7.
Yes, the Galaxy S4 also have fire incidents and they had removable batteries. The point is why does everyone need to copy and follow Apple? Just because Apple have sealed batteries doesn't mean everyone else should follow. Apple doesn't mean they speak for everyone. Samsung tried to emulate Apple. Rushed the Note7 out there. Blew up in their faces.
Usually when phones are being made, it could take at least 18 months. Remember, Steve Jobs still had input on the iPhone 5 that was released 11 months after his death. Heck, Sony PS4 was being planned as early as 2009 before getting released in 2013. I bet the S8 was being planned by the time Note5 was coming out.
Issue is how could Samsung proceed when they don't know the what and how the Note7 burned up like that? The design flaw mystery could already be on the S8. So many conspiracy theories and urban legends are being born out of the Note7 recall...
Did Apple plot against Samsung and controlled sites like The Verge, BGR, and Gizmodo to overblow the issue? I know alot of happy Note7 customers are ticked right now and we're extremely reluctant giving up the best smartphone of 2016.
Was this karma by Samsung for skipping the #6 (devil number) and now is feeling the fires from hell?
Was there a mole working at Samsung to help competitors' chances? Imagine the timing of the first recall was before iPhone 7 being released and the discontinuation was before Pixel being released.
Was the Illuminati involved?
Karma from the greed of planned obsolescence?
Bad engineering, bad timing, bad luck, conspiracy theory, or all of the above?
I still laugh at all the comments for the Note7 like if John Lennon died. It is just a phone. No need for an obituary post for it. People have ADHD and will move on. Every six months, something better does come out. Sega Dreamcast, Palm webOS, and Sony PS Vita all lasted longer. But it shows the impact Note7 had on users in that rollercoaster of TWO MONTHS which is now mistaken for love.
Could Samsung recover? Yeah. Go back being practical and give show us foldable displays which looks to be a huge engineering puzzle by Mobile World Congress. Stop emulating Apple and catering to their crowd. Could they leave the mobile industry and still be ok? Looking at my Samsung at my curved 4K Smart TV, in the words of Curly Howard, soytenly! Mobile or a Note7 and S8 isn't the sole market that gives them income.
A possible year without Samsung could open the floodgates for brands like Apple, Huawei, Nokia (Return of the King), LG, OPPO, or whoever in this game of thrones. With the Note7 becoming the martyr or sacrificial lamb in the industry, lessons are being learned now thanks to the death of the Note7. Companies need to stop packing fast, overheating SoC inside thin and metal frames, fast charging, and Quad HD. Of course phones will generate a ton of heat. Bad karma with impatience in some spec war.
[citation needed]It isn't just Samsung that can't figure it out. There are a bunch of independent people that cant either.
Look at the touch disease, some person with a microscope figured it out when Apple had no idea.
While I don't believe in conspiracy theories sealed batteries, based on some of the logic here, are the very definition of planned obsolescence.Again sealed batteries arent planned obsolscence
The lawsuit?iFixit CEO?[citation needed]
You can get the battery replaced for 70 bucks.You will need 600 bucks to replace a phone wrecked from TDWhile I don't believe in conspiracy theories sealed batteries, based on some of the logic here, are the very definition of planned obsolescence.
[citation needed]
....
You don't know that. Pure speculation that is why citation is needed.For what? That someone else figured out the touch disease problem before apple did?
Lawsuits are inevitable and what does ifixit have to do with this?The lawsuit?iFixit CEO?
You can get the battery replaced for 70 bucks.You will need 600 bucks to replace a phone wrecked from TD
It isn't just Samsung that can't figure it out. There are a bunch of independent people that cant either.
Look at the touch disease, some person with a microscope figured it out when Apple had no idea.
Corporate sabotage? Care to elaborate on your "theory"?I've been very vocal about this battery issue being sketchy. Not a single demo unit in stores, or a unit in someone with a history on a tech site, or even someone they know. Then you add the fact Samsung and other independent third party battery specialists can't figure it out or replicate the issue. You gotta at least wonder, what gives? For the people that think Samsung is hiding something, ask yourself, why would they risk their brand with not being able to tell the public they don't know what the cause was, but please but our next phone. Let's not forget, nobody wanted to return their phone for investigation. Really? Bottom line, I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be corporate sabotage. Not saying I'm leaning that way, but there's enough to be suspicious about. Time will tell.
Why I find it hard to believe they can't figure it out is because they have so many resources to rule out the variables.It isn't just Samsung that can't figure it out. There are a bunch of independent people that cant either.
Look at the touch disease, some person with a microscope figured it out when Apple had no idea.
Yep one learns from their mistakes. But then again the engineers at Samsung shouldn't have been straight out of schools and should have been seasoned enough to avoids catastrophes of this nature. I'm going to avoid the obvious comparison to blackberry.This is a blessing in disguise for Samsung. Sure it will cost them $17B and maybe much more if the S8 isn't released but you learn more from mistakes than from successes. As Bob Ross once said, it isn't a total failure if you learn from it. If you haven't learned from it, then it is a failure. The situation reminds me of Donald Sterling incident in 2014. Blessing in disguise too because while Clippers got Steve Ballmer, way better and richer to have as an NBA owner. Sterling is like Trump. The two Donalds will rot in hell.
Samsung will come back stronger when their backs are against the wall like the Cavs coming back fron a 3-1 by locking in. Listen, Apple nearly went bankrupt in 1996 before their improbable comeback with SJ back at the throne. Samsung really needs to find the issue. I bet most happy Note7 owners if they also knew the root of the problem and steps from preventing it from happening would have never returned their Note7. But everyone was kept in the dark because Samsung is clueless too.
It probably is a design flaw and might not totally be the battery's fault. Who knows really? Like trying to figure out how Amelia Earhart or that Malaysia Airline disappeared. Perhaps forever a great mystery. I knew by the time the Southwest Airline incident, it was game over for Note7. Now it is just time to figure it all out before it happens again since I doubt the design changes with S8 would not be drastically from this seven month pipeline.
I say if Samsung plans to release only one flagship and kill off the Note line, don't rush it. Release it towards the holidays. Being impatient cost them so much anyway. I still kinda believe in the mole conspiracy theory. Since Samsung phones are also made in China, a mole was planted there to ruin their engineering team. Closes the gap for the Chinese OEMs like Huawei and OPPO.
Anyways, comeback stronger and wiser Samsung. Patience. Then if more burning phones get reported and magnified during this post-Note7 era, at least Samsung knows the reasons why and be the first to know steps how to prevent it. Just a little sad they will scrap the Note series. That was the best all-around smarrphone series since 2013. Not the more popular S-line.
Best Smartphones
2010 - iPhone 4
2011 - iPhone 4s
2012 - iPhone 5
2013 - Note 3
2014 - Note 4 (last great Note)
2015 - S6 edge
2016 - Note7 (recaptured its throne, but RIP)
RIP Note7 (Aug 19, 2016-Oct 11, 2016)
RIP Note series (2011-2016)
Best cameras
Best display (arguable)
Note7 had best design of the series
One of the best battery life for all phones
Had removable battery and microSD slot until N4
S-Pen and multi-window support
Weaknesses come from software optimization. My Stepdad was telling me he was pretty ticked off he had to return his coral blue Note7 which was supposed to be the safe one and settled for a gold S7 edge. But I guess Note7 had to sacrifice its life to hopefully make future Samsungs like the S8 so much better.
You don't know that. Pure speculation that is why citation is needed.
...
What a shame, the death of the best phone of 2016 followed by not releasing the S8. I guess the S8 was based on the Note 7 enough for the battery issue to be a possibility on it. Better safe than sorry. Samsung just divert all your mobile energy into foldable screens/phones!!!!!!
Again sealed batteries arent planned obsolscence
The best phone of the year is a phone that explodes. You heard it here first, folks.
I would *never* buy a phone with a foldable screen...
[doublepost=1477174090][/doublepost]
They so are!
The best phone of the year is a phone that explodes. You heard it here first, folks.