Cook can do even more. Allow customizable Control Center (ala TW). Allow even more third party defaults. Etc.
Also release private APIs such as CoreTelephony. Tasker could finally come to iOS with all of its bells and whistles.
Cook can do even more. Allow customizable Control Center (ala TW). Allow even more third party defaults. Etc.
This is what happens when you let a bottom line numbers guy run the show.
And then you have the base Android software. The freedom it grants you goes beyond just customizing home screens, icons, aesthetics, etc. It goes much deeper. Customization means way more than one would think. It translates to real world gains in daily use functions. Things are easier, quicker to access, easier to navigate (hello Back button), and more. Once set up to your liking, the phone accommodates to your needs and preferences and usage patterns. Not the other way around as it can often feel with iOS.
IMO, the annual OS upgrade cycle expectation is ridiculous--I'd much rather the software work better before rushing out features for the sake of saying 'Here's what's new!!'
I'm sorry but this example is just pure rubbish.
Tell me Razeus, who was in charge of Apple for the first 4 versions of the iPhone and first 5 versions of iOS, all of which came with a native keyboard that did EXACTLY what you just described?
I haven't dug deep into the what's new in iOS 9 but I believe I recall reading this change to the keyboard is upcoming.
The guy who did software launches correctly. Not frankly go for patching after the release. Tim has been making bone head decision in regards to software. Apple Music is the latest blunder. Don't get me started on Apple Maps. iOS 8 iCloud drive was the other being that we weren't suppose to turn it on until Yosemite was release or else risk lousy compatibility/access to your files. He should have "tacked" it on after Yosemite was released in a .1 iOS update, but nope, he let users run the risk of not being able to get to their data if they turned on iCloud in iOS 8. Then what? He release a patch that made cell phone calls stop working. It's clear he hasn't the slightest clue about software and someone else is in charge.
The guy who did software launches correctly. Not frankly go for patching after the release. Tim has been making bone head decision in regards to software. Apple Music is the latest blunder. Don't get me started on Apple Maps. iOS 8 iCloud drive was the other being that we weren't suppose to turn it on until Yosemite was release or else risk lousy compatibility/access to your files. He should have "tacked" it on after Yosemite was released in a .1 iOS update, but nope, he let users run the risk of not being able to get to their data if they turned on iCloud in iOS 8. Then what? He release a patch that made cell phone calls stop working. It's clear he hasn't the slightest clue about software and someone else is in charge.
This is what happens when you let a bottom line numbers guy run the show. Tim Cook certainly isn't a visionary. I've never so many launches with buggy software. iWork has been gutted, only to add back a few features. iPhoto/Aperture was reworked as Photos and was a mess and doesn't work with 3rd party apps very well. iWork is a joke. Their Pro software was basically abandoned only to get gutted for the people that kept them alive in the first place. iOS 8 was a complete disaster. Now the Apple Music launch was haphazard.
It never ends with Tim Cook's Apple because he really doesn't understand software, only the supply chain side of things. This is why the software is a mess - too many cooks (not Tim Cook) in the kitchen fighting for their version of the software. All of their software feels like it's just slapped together. The feel of Apple software is gone. Tim is not a software guy and probably doesn't look at "the little things" like Steve did. If he WAS a software guy that paid attention to the details, he would have seen that the keyboard didn't have proper casing in the virtual keyboard to denote lowercase or capital letters. It's little things like that that Apple is lacking these days.
Google also makes amateurish software, with an often startling lack of functionality. They abandon projects, and alienate core users just as much as Apple does.
On the desktop front, I'm strongly considering a switch to Chrome OS.
Just curious, but how exactly do you reconcile these two statements?
Those are what's making me hesitate, even with how cheap Chromebooks are. And I haven't switched to Google Play either yet, for the same reasons. But the web is the web, and I'm successfully switching to web apps and cloud services for most things I used to do on the desktop. $1300 for a Macbook just to get to a browser window would be silly for me.
That's certainly fair...I won't disagree with much of your sentiment, though maybe don't feel quite as strongly as you. Through both iOS 8 and Yosemite, I also thought Apple was trying to take on a little too much at the expense of some polish, fluidity, and efficiency. I'm happy to see that much of iOS9 and El Cap seem to be focusing on under the hood performance. IMO, the annual OS upgrade cycle expectation is ridiculous--I'd much rather the software work better before rushing out features for the sake of saying 'Here's what's new!!'
We'll have to just agree to disagree on some points--specifically Apple's motivation to make profit and how it pertains to the Music and Photos apps/services. By all accounts, Apple is late to the music streaming game. And of course they're going to have it front and center--it's a service intended to make money for Apple. Do you fault Spotify, Rdo, Google Play Music, etc for trying to have you subscribe to their service? Samsung put their own service Milk front and center on their devices last year. And yes, Photos is not Aperture (and as I mentioned, I don't think it's intended to replace Aperture) but it's far better than iPhoto. Apple was in desperate need of some sort of cloud syncing solution as maintaining a library via iPhoto was an exercise in futility, changes to a photo didn't sync across devices, Photostream was severely limited, and the software itself was doggedly slow. Yes, you have to pay for additional storage but you have to pay for comparable storage on Google Drive or Dropbox as well. Sure, Google Photos is free...if you use the option that doesn't maintain photos in their original state. If you want to do that, it'll cost you nearly, if not, the same $ for the same amount of Google Drive storage.
When it comes down to it, Apple's a large, multinational corporation who's shareholders expect performance and profit. It's no different from Google, Samsung, Microsoft--any of the other tech giants. Apple does it better than just about anyone and some people see it as greed. Maybe, but any of the aforementioned companies are striving for exactly the same end goal and would be ecstatic to have the same results. I think shunning Apple for your
And I believe I saw you purchased Amazon Fire phones---there likely isn't a phone out now that a company uses to tout it's own services more than Amazon's offering. Their phone and tablets are basically giant advertisements for their services. Hell, its Prime program is part of the initial sale.
...
Why is this thread slightly inspiring?
*opens drawer, looks at old Galaxy S3*
LOL... the movement has started my friend. They can impose apple watch app on us, they can take away advanced editing feature from iWorks, but they can't take our FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOOM!
He he... Well, actually if anyone reads the Terms & Conditions they kind of can take our freedom, bastards!
LOL... the movement has started my friend. They can impose apple watch app on us, they can take away advanced editing feature from iWorks, but they can't take our FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOOM!
He he... Well, actually if anyone reads the Terms & Conditions they kind of can take our freedom, bastards!
There is nothing technology related I detest more than subscription based services.
omg bless this 11 year old, they made me stay with os x (and ios) for the aesthetic.Along the way we've got the ugly OS X interface (looks like it's been designed by an 11 year old)
I still have a Mac though when its time to upgrade the Mac, I'll be seriously looking at other products.
TrueIt's split down the middle in my household. My wife uses every Apple and owns two 2014 MacBook Pros all the way down to her iPhone 6. I have an iPhone and iPad but all my computing is Windows based as I work in Product Design and 3D modelling packages don't seem to run on Macs. I would switch if they did as the interface is so much nicer than Windows.
It's good to try different interfaces though. I spent years on android and got fed up so switched and will probably do the revert back at some stage. Apple are doing everything right for me at the moment though.
omg bless this 11 year old, they made me stay with os x (and ios) for the aesthetic.
but yeah i'm probably converting to android when the note 5 comes out. i'll get one of those nice gold ipod touches to compensate for my ios cravings.