Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

lordofthereef

macrumors G5
Nov 29, 2011
13,161
3,721
Boston, MA
Sorry but anything Apple makes is more simplistic than it's competitor. And yes, Google maps is very hard to use according to my grandparents.

Have you used Apple's maps? They aren't any simpler to use than the google maps were previously. Well, unless you like not getting transit directions (one less thing to get confused about). ;)
 

Vegastouch

macrumors 603
Jul 12, 2008
6,185
992
Las Vegas, NV
Sorry but anything Apple makes is more simplistic than it's competitor. And yes, Google maps is very hard to use according to my grandparents.

laugh.gif
 

iammike1

macrumors 6502a
Oct 25, 2007
795
46
O'fallon IL
Have you used Apple's maps? They aren't any simpler to use than the google maps were previously. Well, unless you like not getting transit directions (one less thing to get confused about). ;)

Transit directions will be there, just not provided natively by Apple. Third party will be able to tie this into the Maps app from what I'm reading.
 

Bobby Corwen

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Jul 16, 2010
2,723
474
You are shown concrete evidence of where your "superior vector based maps" contain erroneous information (and a pretty big mistake, at that) and you basically say "that doesn't bother me". :confused:

If something as huge as the Arctic Ocean is mislabeled, what makes you think all the "little things" are all properly labeled? I am literally... baffled.

Don't be so baffled.

Think about it.

Those errors will most likely be fixed. It's Apple.

Sorry but anything Apple makes is more simplistic than it's competitor. And yes, Google maps is very hard to use according to my grandparents.

oooooooooooooooooohh

Checkmate.
 

ct2k7

macrumors G3
Aug 29, 2008
8,382
3,439
London
Don't be so baffled.

Think about it.

Those errors will most likely be fixed. It's Apple.



oooooooooooooooooohh

Checkmate.

My parents thing Google Maps is hard, but when they tried Apple Maps, they didn't fare any better, in fact, they fared worse - they didn't know they had to zoom in to get more information - they thought the maps was lacking.

Checkmate.
 

stevemiller

macrumors 68020
Oct 27, 2008
2,057
1,607
Oh yeah, that's really gonna affect my day-to-day commutting and errands...

Youre talking to a guy who was happy when Mapquest came out. It did the job.

To me all that matters is that it is all integrated and works smoothly.

In Google maps when you zoom, there is a moment where the whole system loads the next level of resolution. In the iMaps demo at WWDC, the zooming seemed to be on another lever of vectorness. And if it can deliver that; smoothness and coolness, it is already better than Google Nav. Everything else is unnecessary extras.

The maps on Google seem to be more color coded for major and minor roads vs a more cleaner look on iMaps so far. I dunno about that or how important it is. But in the big picture, I think it's a non-issue. Again, I will have to test this in real life conditions if I feel I miss the Google Map style.

I think not.

One day all major cities will be a recreated 3D model that you can fly around in like spiderman with 1:1 real life accuracy.

Apple has moved us one step closer to that with Flyover, and have made Navigation that much smoother and integrated.

Google will rue the day that they didn't heed Steve's warnings.
I have some important life advice for you:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X6WHBO_Qc-Q
 

lordofthereef

macrumors G5
Nov 29, 2011
13,161
3,721
Boston, MA
Don't be so baffled.

Think about it.

Those errors will most likely be fixed. It's Apple.

Do I think they will be fixed? Of course. But you are sitting here boasting that Apple's maps are better. Well, right now, they are decidedly not. To put it more simply, you are boasting over something that might could be, but isn't yet. THAT, sir, is what baffles me. Because Google Maps most certainly did not get "clapped" as you put it. Not by what we have seen so far in real world use, anyway.

There is also something to be said for Apple's failure thus far to fix Siri, Photostream syncing, iMessages send/receive errors, and probably a few other things. Remember, this is Apple, not God. There is a huge difference.

----------

Transit directions will be there, just not provided natively by Apple. Third party will be able to tie this into the Maps app from what I'm reading.

So third parties will have direct access to the maps app? Or will we need to install a transit app that we launch that then in turn launches the maps app and gives us these transit directions? The first I can certainly live with. The latter is pretty inelegant.

Also, where did you read this? I woud be interested to have a read myself (not because I don't believe you, but because I am generally interested).
 
Last edited:

Bobby Corwen

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Jul 16, 2010
2,723
474
Do I think they will be fixed? Of course. But you are sitting here boasting that Apple's maps are better. Well, right now, they are decidedly not. To put it more simply, you are boasting over something that might could be, but isn't yet. THAT, sir, is what baffles me. Because Google Maps most certainly did not get "clapped" as you put it. Not by what we have seen so far in real world use, anyway.

Oh they got clapped alright.

Look at these two photos. Tell me which one is cooler. Be honest with yourself.

c9130849.jpg


1c8fd425.jpg


The way you can tell there is tall buildings in exhibit B is by how much shade there is near them...

Can you figure out which one is better than the other?
 

Electric turd

macrumors member
Mar 30, 2011
68
0
Oh they got clapped alright.

Look at these two photos. Tell me which one is cooler. Be honest with yourself.

Image

Image

The way you can tell there is tall buildings in exhibit B is by how much shade there is near them...

Can you figure out which one is better than the other?

Guess you missed the google maps keynote 2 weeks ago? they have the exact same technology that apple bought from c3 mapping

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6Douyfa7l8&feature=player_embedded
 

Electric turd

macrumors member
Mar 30, 2011
68
0
Is the 3d mode in navigation or just flyover??? From what we were shown at WWDC navigation was only in the simple map view
 

cyks

macrumors 68020
Jul 24, 2002
2,091
9
Westchester County, NY
That will be nice to play around with on Google Earth, but I didn't see anywhere it says it will be on Google Navigation for Android....

As posted in the video's info... posted by Google:
"Since 2006, we've had textured 3D buildings in Google Earth, and we're excited to announce that we'll begin adding 3D models to entire metropolitan areas to Google Earth on mobile devices in the near future."
 

lordofthereef

macrumors G5
Nov 29, 2011
13,161
3,721
Boston, MA
Oh they got clapped alright.

Look at these two photos. Tell me which one is cooler. Be honest with yourself.

Image

Image

The way you can tell there is tall buildings in exhibit B is by how much shade there is near them...

Can you figure out which one is better than the other?

Apple's picture is cooler. But what looks cooler doesn't necessarily translate to more useful. Until this is available in more than 5 cities (I picked a random number... but I KNOW most large cities, London being one of them still don't have this feature) I am not going to pass judgement. It certainly has the potential to be better. As it stands, it certainly is not.

As mentioned in the other areas Apple has failed to deliver, namely Siri, I don't expect the image you showed to be an accurate representation of the cities that most Americans, let alone the world, lives in for year(s) to come.

Anyway, you are obviously blinded. This is fine. But I am also obviously wasting my time here. The plethora of down votes on every one of your posts speaks for itself btw. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Meanee

macrumors 6502a
Mar 8, 2011
558
4
Oh they got clapped alright.

Look at these two photos. Tell me which one is cooler. Be honest with yourself.

Image

Image

The way you can tell there is tall buildings in exhibit B is by how much shade there is near them...

Can you figure out which one is better than the other?

Great comparison. Probably pre-rendered image vs older version, not fully loaded image. :rolleyes: A real argument winner right there. Case closed. We can all go home now.
 

macMD

macrumors 6502
Nov 25, 2005
359
28
New York
I'm sure I will use the new Maps app, and will add Google Maps as well along with the other numerous GPS related apps I carry on my iDevices. Why would I settle for just one so, so app when none are totally perfect. Of course now that Google Maps has to be separate we can likely see all of those features Google didn't want to give Apple included at no charge.
 

Electric turd

macrumors member
Mar 30, 2011
68
0
I'm sure I will use the new Maps app, and will add Google Maps as well along with the other numerous GPS related apps I carry on my iDevices. Why would I settle for just one so, so app when none are totally perfect. Of course now that Google Maps has to be separate we can likely see all of those features Google didn't want to give Apple included at no charge.

He speaks the truth

----------

Look at these two videos. Tell me which one is cooler.

YouTube: video

Vs

Skip to 3:00
YouTube: video

Can you figure out which one is better than the other??

Again....you are comparing the navigation part of google to a GIMMICK "flyover", google has that too. I dont understand why you cant figure that out!!

You really are a blind fanboy arent you?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.