I should clarify, I am not positive the Pixel 2 screens are not laminated. Sorry if that was confusing.
[doublepost=1507906126][/doublepost]
I suspect this will be the reality. Google clearly don't care much about design/materials/industrial engineering.
The Pixel to them is a representation of how useful a phone is once the screen is on, not how pretty it is when the screen is off.
Saying that, we still have to wait for reviews from the usual sources.
My criticisms of the bezels are for when the screen is on.
Speaking generally to everybody now:
Not trying to knock people's decision on their Pixel 2, just offering my take on the brief hands on I had. Keep in mind, I have two Pixel 2's coming my way and will be able to do a closer observation and comparison then.
I think it's wrong to think that design doesn't impact actual use (the idea that it only matters when the screen is off). If the idea of a bezel-less design is to create more immersion, and the idea of OLED tech is to offer a better quality screen (contrast ratios, colors, viewing angles, etc.) then there is no question that Samsung has the lead on this front. How far ahead is Samsung's display technology? I'm not sure, but they are surely ahead.
And the screen experience does matter. It's literally what you're looking at.
So when you have bezels that are either awkwardly done, ala the Pixel 2 XL, or when they're just straight up big, ala the Pixel 2, it takes away from the immersive effect. In the case of the Pixel 2, there is no immersive effect. If I'm not mistaken, the bezels on the Pixel 2 actually looked even larger than the bezels on the original Pixel 1, which happened to be right next to the Pixel 2's.
Neither Pixel 2 models, to me, felt like a modern and well designed 2017 flagship. The regular Pixel 2 felt straight up like a budget phone out of 2016.
And the Pixel 2 XL feels like it's a first-generation attempt at a bezel-less smartphone that might have came out a year or two ago, like it was amazing at the time how far they got the edges to, but by today's standard, is behind.
[doublepost=1507906267][/doublepost]
My thoughts too. I mean every reviewer has said the display is gorgeous and nothing to worry about.
Then...if memory serves me right...last year everyone roasted the Pixel and the design. Myself included!
Only to have the Pixel provide the best smartphone camera and consensus best Android user experience.
The Pixel was better than the sum of its parts last year. I am thinking this year could be the same!
Indeed this did happen. But speaking about design alone, I think the Pixel 1's design had way more character and balance going for it. The Pixel 2 design doesn't quite strike the same effect. In particular, the two-tone back design of the Pixel 2 just looks imbalanced and awkward, whereas with the Pixel 1, at least the two-tone look was more evenly divided. It gave the Pixel 1 some character.
I'm not confident the Pixel 2 will garner that same kind of lovable attraction the Pixel 1 eventually got. Of course, I could be wrong.