I would really would love to have an Android device replace my iPhone. I hope the S24U does that.
The problem as I see it is as long as you don't have a Windows environment to use your s24u then you are always going to be back in the same spot.
In Apple ecosystem everything revolves around the iPhone. Once you take the iPhone away the whole thing loses a ton of connectivity and usefulness.
This means anyone who switches to Android and has a Mac and iPad or Apple watch now lose texting ability, you lose FaceTime, Airdrop and iMessage all at once. You have to deregister your Apple ID from your phone number and it is a big hassle with long term consequences that most people don't think about.
Alternatively if you have a Windows PC and a Galaxy tablet and or Samsung Galaxy watch or Pixel watch then you gain most of those features back.
If you have an iPhone and a Windows PC and Galaxy tablet you would find yourself in the same situation as the iPhone user switching to Android.
Now if both sides were equally at fault for this situation then I would blame both equally but it isn't. Apple has purposely gone out of their way to make everything that runs on MacOS, iPadOS or iOS to be as incompatible as possible with any other platform. You can't use Pages on a PC for example. Why can't we use Pages on a PC? Wouldn't it make it be adopted by more people which would make it a more standardized format across industry like Word is?
Apple purposely makes their products work well only in their universe by design. It is sort of a sneaky way to force you to do something. It is also a way to separate people by what they use which a lot of Apple users have loved to do for years.
This more than anything else has made me question my loyalty to Apple. I love their products but I don't like to be forced to use them against my will because of convenience. It would be so much better if everything on Apple was cross platform friendly and would allow me to freely choose the best devices to match my use case. I prefer a Mac but enjoy an Android phone. I shouldn't have to use an entirety different platform just to get the same level of features when they exist in both platforms and devices.
This is why for now I am all in on Android and as much as I don't love Windows or Linux I can get by just fine on any platform. If the EU forces Apple to open up it's software it may be the best thing that ever happened to Apple despite Apple.
I don't know but I just don't think it is a good business practice to sell lockdown and bait it as convenience and interconnectivity when you only get that with their products. So if you start using their products you are also agreeing to only use their products if you want everything to "just work". I don't think people realize that at first.
It starts with an iPhone then maybe a MacBook then an iPad and before you know it you are deep locked into the Apple ecosystem. Have friends and family who have iPhones too- now you are double locked down. Then you decide to try a watch. It is only been a couple years but now even if you wanted to try an Android phone or tablet or that cheap gaming laptop you can't because what would you do with it outside of the ecosystem? Sound familiar? I hear it a million times on here.
People just don't seem to get it. Yup. You tried to go outside the Apple walls and got burnt.
The only option now is to be a multi platform user and have a Windows laptop and a Mac and use whatever phone you like based on what hardware and software you like best this year. Or you stay in one side or the other.
I will say that if I was forced to choose only one platform I don't know what I would do. I really like MacOS over Windows but I also love my Pixel and have no desire for a Titanium iPhone right now. Since I live in the US most of my friends and family and even teachers have iPhones so communication with them is better when I have an iPhone.
I don't think with my curiosity that I could ever give up a Mac completely but I could give up the iPhone and iPad and use Android, Windows and a Galaxy tablet and be perfectly fine.
I can also say the opposite. I am all in with Apple because their take on "innovation" appeals to me, and it matters more to me than whatever android / windows / any other platform has to offer. By your definition, I can also interpret it to mean that the competition is not innovating. At least, not in a manner that I care about.
To me, it feels more accurate to state that Apple views innovation very differently from the competition. And because Apple runs iOS, it doesn't need to engage in meaningless spec wars with other smartphones. While android smartphones are busy trying to measure which has more ram or more megapixels in their camera and which takes better moon shots, Apple is free to instead look at innovation as something that can directly improve customers’ lives.
In a sense, it's not unlike how, at a time when android smartphones were obsessed with having more (slower) cores, Apple instead made the right call of focusing on 2 faster cores with their A7 chip back in 2013. It didn't matter that everyone else seemed to be laughing at the iPhone (and by extension, iPhone users) for having less ram and less cores. Apple never lost sight of what mattered - not specs, but the end user experience. If 1gb ram and 2 cores was what was needed to give the iPhone 5s faster performance and better battery life, then it was the right thing to do, even if it didn't look impressive on a spec sheet.
Instead of announcing a splashy new feature or upgrade just to be first or different or to win a meaningless spec war, Apple announces select features and upgrades that it thinks will lead to better experiences. While this tends to lead to shorter new feature lists, the new features that have been announced have often been more impactful. Emergency SOS via satellite is a great example which has already been credited with saving lives, and it showcases Apple doing what they do best - leverage their control over hardware, software and services to offer unique value propositions.
This isn't a feature that makes for a riveting YouTube review video, but it's also hard to deny the value found with having such a feature present in your device.
It wouldn't be easy for say, Samsung to offer a similar feature. It's not just having the chip in your device. There's the custom software designed by Apple, there's the customised hardware found in base stations that receive the signals from the satellites, and there's Apple's willingness and financial capability to buy an entire company's worth of satellite capacity to support said feature. Putting all these together will not be easy for android smartphone OEMs, nor will it be cheap.
The same can be said for a lot of things that Apple does right, and I don't see why they somehow don't count as "meaningful innovation" simply because Android doesn't do it. For example, Apple gets to reap the benefits of having a cohesive ecosystem of hardware, software and services because they were the only company willing to invest in having an ecosystem in the first place. The iOS App Store gets the best apps because of the lower incidence of piracy (since users can't readily sideload apps) and because Apple actually invests more resources into curating apps compared to Google. Every year, Apple releases a new version of iOS without fail which gets pushed out to hundreds of million of devices on day 1 without fail.
And for what it's worth, I do also have my Apple TV hooked up to my smart TV, not least because I don't trust the TV's OS enough to connect it to the internet. And that's probably another reason why I don't see myself using android anytime soon (or ever).
I here this kind of arrogant response about Apple all the time and it really bothers me. Sure there may have been a time when Jobs was still around or shortly after where Apple as a company wouldn't release a gimmick feature and would only add a feature if they thought it would help the customer experience. Those days have long gone. Now Apple uses or withholds features arbitrarily just to push people up the ladder into iPhone Pro territory.
Basic things on a phone that actually improve my life is the call screening feature on my Pixel not Titanium on the iPhone?
90hz display are on the cheapest Android phone but Apple will still give you a 60hz display on a brand new iPhone. The difference between 60hz and 90hz on a phone or iPad is pretty significant in day to day use.
I could go on and on.
What I think people consider innovation is something that is completely new in the mobile industry that then leads the industry. We haven't seen this from Apple in a long time. Android phones have foldable phones which would be a completely new concept in the mobile industry that has been an innovative leader.
You can debate the usefulness of a foldable phone all you want but you can't deny it is a very innovative thing.
All of the AI features in a Pixel phone like call screening, call waiting, menu navigation and much, much more are all innovative features that are leading the industry.
Apple is great at making a premium phone but making a innovative product or feature has been missing for a long time now. It seems Apple just brings over an Android feature and calls it new. App library, active widgets, and much more.
So please spare me with the Apple only adds innovation when it actually enhances a user experience. Part of figuring out what makes a good user experience is developing and creating some innovative projects that might fail. But if you always play it safe then you become a follower and boring.
When Apple takes risks they pay off. Look at the a series processors, m series. Big risks of failure but huge benefits when they succeeded. When Apple innovates they have lines around the block to get their products. It is simply a matter of Apple taking more risks on research and development instead of just playing it safe. MacBook pro line was another big risk by redesigning the Macs from the ground up and using Apple silicon and it has been a huge success.
It is not like Apple can't be innovative. But let's not pretend what they are doing now is innovative. Call Apple on their laziness because if they wait too long it will eventually hurt their bottom line and that is when Apple tends to get competitive which is when they feel threatened.