A lot of concern here for running it on mbp's and imacs. Would it run ok on my mac pro, i have a 8800GT?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Gta Iv
- Thread starter AlexisV
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Really annoyed! Got home last night, start Windows, get error message and it restarts and restarts and restarts in a loop. Works in safe mode, but not normally. Turns out some trojan has screwed everything up according to AVG. I'm stumped because I rarely use Windows for anything other than gaming.
Had to do a full reinstall and still need to sort of the graphics drivers and SP3 tonight.
Anyway, I'm hearing that the game has serious flaws with the GPU/CPU workload. Even people with great graphics cards are getting about 20FPS because the CPU is creating a bottleneck. The only happy people seem to be Quad Core owners (so your Mac Pro should be ok if its got one of those).
Rockstar are working on a patch. I'm not sure how it was allowed to be released in its present state.
Had to do a full reinstall and still need to sort of the graphics drivers and SP3 tonight.
Anyway, I'm hearing that the game has serious flaws with the GPU/CPU workload. Even people with great graphics cards are getting about 20FPS because the CPU is creating a bottleneck. The only happy people seem to be Quad Core owners (so your Mac Pro should be ok if its got one of those).
Rockstar are working on a patch. I'm not sure how it was allowed to be released in its present state.
nVidia 8600M GT 128mb ram on a 2.2 mbp w/ 2 gigs of ram...
... complete crap.
On all low settings, it's BARELY playable, I mean lag out the a**.
It runs like hell on anything that doesn't have two graphics cards I bet... lol.
I'm beyond pissed, this post only shows one one trillionth of how I really feel....
I run it on all low on my MBP w/ 256MB vid ram and it runs fine for the most part. I get 15-25 fps at least, playable and somewhat smooth for the most part.
Its video memory also. This game requires 1.4GB of video texture memory to run everything on high/native resolution, thats not including how well it'll run (FPS wise).
ayeying, I changed it to the auto configured settings and ran it at a much lower resolution and it runs just fine now... but I would REALLY like to run it at native resolution. I hope this patch that Rockstar is working on will let me do so...
For MBP owners with an nVidia 8600M GT 128mb Vram, run it at auto configured settings and resolution under 1200 X 800 (two resolutions below) and it runs pretty smooth.
For MBP owners with an nVidia 8600M GT 128mb Vram, run it at auto configured settings and resolution under 1200 X 800 (two resolutions below) and it runs pretty smooth.
I don't like SecureROM, but it hasn't caused a problem for me, so my dislike comes from the idea of it being there. It's on Dead Space and Fallout 3 and both play perfect on my comp. I still have not bought Mass Effect because of its reported problems.
It dips below 30 fps on the 360, but not that often.
And dual-booting sucks, but then again, that's a choice, but so is buying an actual PC and my gaming rig was more than $1500 less than the MacBook Pro I use and it can handle these games at a level higher than any console.
Anyways, any convenience that a console offers is quickly trumped by a PC's better controller options, modding support -- weather it's official or a hack, and the fact that all DLC is free -- MS learned the hard way that they can't bring this BS back from their console, where users will blindly pay for anything -- and online support is WAY better.
I've never been into GTA, buy my friend is and like me he won't touch a console's controller with a 10 foot pole for games that require aiming. This will be the first GTA I buy and that's because of Zero Punctuation's review, but I can wait for Rockstar's patch.
It dips below 30 fps on the 360, but not that often.
And dual-booting sucks, but then again, that's a choice, but so is buying an actual PC and my gaming rig was more than $1500 less than the MacBook Pro I use and it can handle these games at a level higher than any console.
Anyways, any convenience that a console offers is quickly trumped by a PC's better controller options, modding support -- weather it's official or a hack, and the fact that all DLC is free -- MS learned the hard way that they can't bring this BS back from their console, where users will blindly pay for anything -- and online support is WAY better.
I've never been into GTA, buy my friend is and like me he won't touch a console's controller with a 10 foot pole for games that require aiming. This will be the first GTA I buy and that's because of Zero Punctuation's review, but I can wait for Rockstar's patch.
Does anyone know for a fact or even think that this patch will fix whatever is causing the game to run slow? I have a feeling that there is nothing they can do to boost graphic performance, not in a patch anyway... Anyone have any evidence I'm wrong? I would love to be wrong about that hahaha...
I just want my game to run nice and smooth at decent settings.
I just want my game to run nice and smooth at decent settings.
i dont know how powerful the new MBP are compared the latest iMac but it runs ok on mine (not as good as it should tho but playable). Only thing is I'm not sure how 256mb graphics card will handle the game.
To any one else able to run the game, when I benchmark my system, the results say I have a Intel Pentium III Xeon-Processor?? But aluminiium iMac's all run on Core 2 Duo's right? Or is the same thing?
To any one else able to run the game, when I benchmark my system, the results say I have a Intel Pentium III Xeon-Processor?? But aluminiium iMac's all run on Core 2 Duo's right? Or is the same thing?
The game needs MO MEMORY for its hugeness!!!!
As in video memory? Or just regular system memory?
Now I wish I had bought the 256mb model...
Im about to buy a imac 24 incher with 256 of video ram, will it run smooth or I need some more video power?
You'll most likely need more. Or, save your money, get an Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3 and a copy of the game.
They run GTA IV really well, excluding the fact that 360's have a 9000% chance of s**tting up.
You'll most likely need more. Or, save your money, get an Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3 and a copy of the game.
They run GTA IV really well, excluding the fact that 360's have a 9000% chance of s**tting up.
LOL, the PS3 runs the game but at 640p (around 986x740 in 4:3 aspect ratio to give you an idea) with no AA, I think even my 1st-gen MBP can run the game at better settings
You have to realize consoles are not magic and they are $200-$400 for a reason.
I just went to Best Buy to buy it. I got in my car and then I read the recommended specs:
Core 2 Quad 2.4GHz or Phenom X3 2.6GHz
2.25GB of RAM
18GB of HDD
512MB VRAM 8600 GT (that's the desktop version with 256-bit bus).
I promptly returned it.
Core 2 Quad 2.4GHz or Phenom X3 2.6GHz
2.25GB of RAM
18GB of HDD
512MB VRAM 8600 GT (that's the desktop version with 256-bit bus).
I promptly returned it.
Why didn't you read the specs on the box before you bough it?
Here' the price of that system.
Core 2 Quad 6600 2.4 Ghz --- $165 (For not even $15 more you can get a faster Quad that uses way less power)
Intel Mobo (reliable) --- $120
4 Gig Ram --- $100
8600 GT 512 --- $80
hard drive 7 BILLION Terabytes --- 2 cents.
Antec PSU (reliable) --- $70
Antec Case $50+
About $600 give or take. Yes, I can add...
I have XP and XP 64.
Anyways, considering how fast PCs are now days, it's not that much, if you're into these types of games. Bumping up the GPU for about $50 more would double the GPU performance. I left out the mouse, keyboard and monitor, since we all have them -- I have more than I care to admit.
Here' the price of that system.
Core 2 Quad 6600 2.4 Ghz --- $165 (For not even $15 more you can get a faster Quad that uses way less power)
Intel Mobo (reliable) --- $120
4 Gig Ram --- $100
8600 GT 512 --- $80
hard drive 7 BILLION Terabytes --- 2 cents.
Antec PSU (reliable) --- $70
Antec Case $50+
About $600 give or take. Yes, I can add...
I have XP and XP 64.
Anyways, considering how fast PCs are now days, it's not that much, if you're into these types of games. Bumping up the GPU for about $50 more would double the GPU performance. I left out the mouse, keyboard and monitor, since we all have them -- I have more than I care to admit.
LOL, the PS3 runs the game but at 640p (around 986x740 in 4:3 aspect ratio to give you an idea) with no AA, I think even my 1st-gen MBP can run the game at better settings
You have to realize consoles are not magic and they are $200-$400 for a reason.
Yeah, but they save the trouble of "OH SHI-, there is a new game out that needs 500GB RAM and a 20 Core CPU just to animate my characters face!"
My old PlayStation 2, purchased on day one, plays all games that have been made over the last 8 years (for the PlayStation 2). And I expect my PlayStation 3 to do the same.
You don't get that kind of mileage out of a gaming PC.
It doesn't make sense. I played it on 360 before, why in the world does it required such high end specs??I just went to Best Buy to buy it. I got in my car and then I read the recommended specs:
Core 2 Quad 2.4GHz or Phenom X3 2.6GHz
2.25GB of RAM
18GB of HDD
512MB VRAM 8600 GT (that's the desktop version with 256-bit bus).
I promptly returned it.
Me too, but IIRC the price tag was way too high for just 128mb more RAM and minor improvements in HDD space.
Plus back then very few games required more than 128mb or at least came with low-res textures for such cards.
BTW: Thanks for letting me know how bad it runs on this MBP model. I won't consider buying this game anymore.
angelneo said:
First of all they reworked the textures for the PC version. At the lowest setting they should look as good as the 360 version (the 360 and PS3 versions use around 256mb video RAM). So that's why 256mb VRAM are minimum.
Then they added some new features like the replay editor.
And the usual suspects: Higher resolution, more hardware configurations to consider and running on top of a huge OS...
Lastly I believe that Rockstar is much better at developing great game concepts than implementing them. They obviously haven't spent any time to optimize for the PC architecture. On a side note their game engines have flaws which they didn't care to solve since 2001 (GTA III and Max Payne). Just look at all the clipping errors in GTA IV. Doesn't hurt gameplay, but says a lot about their priorities.
Agreed! I bought an Xbox 360 for gaming on so I've been playing GTA 4 perfectly in HD for nearly a year. Ironically, Microsoft become the Apple of the console world when it comes to gaming.
And?It dips below 30 fps on the 360, but not that often.
Movies are made in 24 fps, most TV shows are below 30 fps. The human eye barely notices anything above 30fps.Does the game drop below 30fps on the Xbox? I haven't even noticed and don't care! I'm sitting here about to play GTA 4 and you're not :0
Hehe. or $200 for a 360.
I don't understand why more people don't just use their computer for computing and buy a console for gaming? Gaming on a sofa in front of the TV is a lot more comfortable!
some people aren't confortable playing thuglife-simulators in front of their granny in the living room