I usually wait until Max Tech starts piecing it altogether. Otherwise it's just conjecture.
the SoC. people expected yearly updates and then the worldwide silicon shortage happened—just feels like quite a trend on MR where they’re constantly in a lose-lose situation.The SoC or the MBA 15"?
You would want annual updates so that Mac chips' CPU cores, GPU cores, Neural Engine, Media Engine and other chip tech would be aligned with the iPhone instead of every 19.5 months.the SoC. people expected yearly updates and then the worldwide silicon shortage happened—just feels like quite a trend on MR where they’re constantly in a lose-lose situation.
no yearly updates: “where are the updates we were promised?!”
yearly updates: “why are they upgrading the computer just a YEAR after I bought my new one?!”
thankfully, there are a lot of voices of reason here. a yearly upgrade has become virtually unnecessary with the advent of AS (and this extends to the A-series, which it’s clear was their near-15 year practice run for the M-series). (oh man, another post gushing about my M2 MBP) my laptop perfectly suits my needs and barring some kind of accident (and even then, minus loss/theft, I’m covered under AppleCare+ after one too many out-of-pocket logic board replacements over the years), I can’t see myself updating for at least another five years.
unless I magically become rich and can update just for the sake of it. but I’d like to think I would allocate that capital in a bit wiser of a manner 🤪
M-series chips COULD get the longest support of any machine Apple has made so far. I don’t think the M1s are going to seem too slow in a couple of years and may last for a much longer time than their Intel machines did. Remember, Apple has pretty successfully converted to a services company as well as hardware, and if they can keep you paying for services on old devices, why not?Look at how long Apple is supporting OS updates on iPads, iPhones, and Apple Watch. If that's any indication, no reason an M2-based Mac gets at least 6 years of OS updates.
NO. It will be the XV. Personally, I'm really excited by the חי version.I think some of these leakers like Gurman don’t actually have a source for some things. Of course Apple’s going to release an M3 version next year. Let me guess “according to a rumor” they’re also releasing an iPhone 15 in October.🤣
I'm in the same boat. Of course we'll both be faced then with the "problem" of that hoped-for M3 iMac having a plain Jane M3, and we know that there will be Pro, Max and Ultra versions of that chip coming out eventually. So do we wait for some future thing to be better? Or buy what exists, as soon as it's announced?Not too exciting news. I won't be buying another Mac until a 27" (preferably 32") M3 iMac is available. Although I might consider a Mac Studio if a reasonably priced large Retina display finally shows up. To be fair, my M1 Max MB Pro is amazing and I expect to be using it for 5-10 years so I'm not in any rush anyway.
This. It’s very late in the game to introduce M2 in a new machine. The M2 debuted a year ago in the 13” version, and now the 15” a year later.Ughhhh! What was the point of releasing MacBook Air in M2 last week then 😑.
I’m really hoping with an M3 Chip, Apple can push out 24 hours of battery life on a single charge.
You would want annual updates so that Mac chips' CPU cores, GPU cores, Neural Engine, Media Engine and other chip tech would be aligned with the iPhone instead of every 19.5 months.
So say 4-6 years or later from date of purchase you'd have better tech on a 12 month cycle.
If you bought a 2014 Mac 14nm by 2024 your Mac would have a 3nm chip with the tech of the latest iPhone scaled up for macOS.
More battery life is always welcomed, but the battery life of 15 hours wireless web is certainly adequate. For me the biggest issue with the machine is the lack of an SD Card. And for the sake of compatibility for conference attendees and office workers and teachers they should have included a HDMI port. And it would fit because I’ve checked on the 13.6” model. Many people like myself need an SD Card now and then but dislike dongles, adapters and chunky laptops like MBP.Is anyone else disappointed by the 15" battery life ? Had such high expectations to see it have the best battery out of the whole MacBook lineup
Couldn't they fit a larger battery in there ?
So you think they were likely targeting an M3 launch, but as that seems to still be so far out, they had to rush it out with an M2? Seems plausible given the initial rumours were for it to have M3 (I seem to remember?).
6 years' support for a very expensive laptop that might be working fine for a lot longer than that is poor form, in my opinion. Apple should be more than embarrassed that Google can and do supply an up-to-date OS that you can install on older Macs than that.Look at how long Apple is supporting OS updates on iPads, iPhones, and Apple Watch. If that's any indication, no reason an M2-based Mac gets at least 6 years of OS updates.
oh, i’m with you on the ideology behind annual updates—i just don’t think said updates necessitate a need to update every year. that’s where my elaboration came from.You would want annual updates so that Mac chips' CPU cores, GPU cores, Neural Engine, Media Engine and other chip tech would be aligned with the iPhone instead of every 19.5 months.
So say 4-6 years or later from date of purchase you'd have better tech on a 12 month cycle.
If you bought a 2014 Mac 14nm by 2024 your Mac would have a 3nm chip with the tech of the latest iPhone scaled up for macOS.
I'm not buying annually.oh, i’m with you on the ideology behind annual updates—i just don’t think said updates necessitate a need to update every year. that’s where my elaboration came from.